A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

Philip Hyland, Daniel Boduszek, Katie Dhingra, Mark Shevlin, Arlene Egan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inconsistency exists in the empirical literature with respect to the underlying factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1989). In research contexts the RSES is considered a unidimensional measure of self-esteem. Empirical findings have undermined this conceptualisation with factor analytic findings favouring a variety of one-factor solutions (with correlated measurement errors) or multidimensional representations. The current study applied a bifactor modelling approach to provide a theoretical and methodologically satisfying resolution to the current inconsistency. Three alternative factor models of the RSES were tested among a large sample of the adult population (N= 6082). Results indicated that a bifactor model was the best fit of the data. This model was demonstrated to be factorially invariant among males and females. The reliability of the scale was established using composite reliability. Results are discussed in terms of resolving the debate about the appropriate factor structure of the RSES.

LanguageEnglish
Pages188-192
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Research
Population

Cite this

Hyland, Philip ; Boduszek, Daniel ; Dhingra, Katie ; Shevlin, Mark ; Egan, Arlene. / A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2014 ; Vol. 66. pp. 188-192.
@article{b20ebbb787b241008795383a565f933e,
title = "A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale",
abstract = "Inconsistency exists in the empirical literature with respect to the underlying factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1989). In research contexts the RSES is considered a unidimensional measure of self-esteem. Empirical findings have undermined this conceptualisation with factor analytic findings favouring a variety of one-factor solutions (with correlated measurement errors) or multidimensional representations. The current study applied a bifactor modelling approach to provide a theoretical and methodologically satisfying resolution to the current inconsistency. Three alternative factor models of the RSES were tested among a large sample of the adult population (N= 6082). Results indicated that a bifactor model was the best fit of the data. This model was demonstrated to be factorially invariant among males and females. The reliability of the scale was established using composite reliability. Results are discussed in terms of resolving the debate about the appropriate factor structure of the RSES.",
keywords = "Bifactor modelling, Confirmatory factor analysis, Factorial invariance, Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), Self-esteem",
author = "Philip Hyland and Daniel Boduszek and Katie Dhingra and Mark Shevlin and Arlene Egan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.034",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "188--192",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale. / Hyland, Philip; Boduszek, Daniel; Dhingra, Katie; Shevlin, Mark; Egan, Arlene.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 66, 2014, p. 188-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

AU - Hyland, Philip

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Dhingra, Katie

AU - Shevlin, Mark

AU - Egan, Arlene

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Inconsistency exists in the empirical literature with respect to the underlying factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1989). In research contexts the RSES is considered a unidimensional measure of self-esteem. Empirical findings have undermined this conceptualisation with factor analytic findings favouring a variety of one-factor solutions (with correlated measurement errors) or multidimensional representations. The current study applied a bifactor modelling approach to provide a theoretical and methodologically satisfying resolution to the current inconsistency. Three alternative factor models of the RSES were tested among a large sample of the adult population (N= 6082). Results indicated that a bifactor model was the best fit of the data. This model was demonstrated to be factorially invariant among males and females. The reliability of the scale was established using composite reliability. Results are discussed in terms of resolving the debate about the appropriate factor structure of the RSES.

AB - Inconsistency exists in the empirical literature with respect to the underlying factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1989). In research contexts the RSES is considered a unidimensional measure of self-esteem. Empirical findings have undermined this conceptualisation with factor analytic findings favouring a variety of one-factor solutions (with correlated measurement errors) or multidimensional representations. The current study applied a bifactor modelling approach to provide a theoretical and methodologically satisfying resolution to the current inconsistency. Three alternative factor models of the RSES were tested among a large sample of the adult population (N= 6082). Results indicated that a bifactor model was the best fit of the data. This model was demonstrated to be factorially invariant among males and females. The reliability of the scale was established using composite reliability. Results are discussed in terms of resolving the debate about the appropriate factor structure of the RSES.

KW - Bifactor modelling

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Factorial invariance

KW - Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES)

KW - Self-esteem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899049333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.034

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.034

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 188

EP - 192

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

T2 - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -