TY - JOUR
T1 - A bifactorial solution to the Psychopathy Checklist
T2 - Screening Version in a sample of civil psychiatric patients
AU - Boduszek, Daniel
AU - Dhingra, Katie
AU - Hyland, Philip
AU - Debowska, Agata
PY - 2016/7/5
Y1 - 2016/7/5
N2 - Background: There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV). An established view is that it reflects a unitary construct underpinned by two correlated factors. More recent research has, however, undermined this conceptualisation. Aims: Our aim was to compare 10 competing models of the PCL: SV in a sample of civil psychiatric patients. Method: Ten distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modelling. Results: A bifactor model, including two general factors (interpersonal–affective and antisocial–lifestyle), and four subordinate factors (interpersonal, affective, antisocial and lifestyle) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of the conceptualisation was supported through the use of composite reliability, and the differential relationships exhibited between the general factors and measures of personality, impulsivity and mental health. Conclusions: Our findings provide further weight to taking the two general psychopathy factors into account when interpreting the PCL: SV for clinical purposes.
AB - Background: There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV). An established view is that it reflects a unitary construct underpinned by two correlated factors. More recent research has, however, undermined this conceptualisation. Aims: Our aim was to compare 10 competing models of the PCL: SV in a sample of civil psychiatric patients. Method: Ten distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modelling. Results: A bifactor model, including two general factors (interpersonal–affective and antisocial–lifestyle), and four subordinate factors (interpersonal, affective, antisocial and lifestyle) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of the conceptualisation was supported through the use of composite reliability, and the differential relationships exhibited between the general factors and measures of personality, impulsivity and mental health. Conclusions: Our findings provide further weight to taking the two general psychopathy factors into account when interpreting the PCL: SV for clinical purposes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977589789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cbm.1956
DO - 10.1002/cbm.1956
M3 - Article
C2 - 25832999
AN - SCOPUS:84977589789
VL - 26
SP - 174
EP - 185
JO - Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
JF - Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
SN - 0957-9664
IS - 3
ER -