A Comparative Study on the Contact Fatigue Failure Mechanisms of Mn-Cr Series and Cr-Mo Series Gear Steels Based on Surface Integrity and Damage Morphology

The contact fatigue performance of carburized gear steels is critical for transmission durability, yet the mechanisms linking alloy-specific microstructure to failure modes remain complex. This study systematically compares the contact fatigue behaviors of 20MnCr5 and 20CrMoH gears using step-loading tests and multi-scale characterization. The results demonstrate a significantly higher contact fatigue limit for 20MnCr5 of 1709 ± 12 MPa compared to 1652 ± 40 MPa for 20CrMoH, despite the latter exhibiting higher initial surface hardness. This hardness–toughness paradox is mechanistically elucidated by the distinct roles of alloying elements: while Molybdenum in 20CrMoH refines the grain size for high static strength, it limits retained austenite stability, resulting in a brittle hard-shell and soft-core structure prone to interface decohesion at martensite lath boundaries. Conversely, Manganese in 20MnCr5 promotes a gentler hardness gradient via favorable diffusion kinetics and stabilizes abundant film-like retained austenite. This microstructure activates a Stress Compensation Mechanism, where strain-induced martensitic transformation generates compressive volume expansion to counteract cyclic stress relaxation. Consequently, 20MnCr5 exhibits mild plastic micropitting driven by transformation toughening, whereas 20CrMoH undergoes severe brittle spalling driven by the Eggshell Effect. These findings confirm that balancing matrix toughness with hardness is more critical than maximizing surface hardness alone for contact fatigue resistance.