A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004-2009

Jill Johnes, Marwan Izzeldin, Vasileios Pappas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks during the period 2004-2009 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and meta-frontier analysis (MFA). The use of the non-parametric MFA allows for the decomposition of gross efficiency (i.e. the efficiency of banks when measured relative to a common frontier) into 2 components: net efficiency (the efficiency of banks measured relative to their own bank type frontier) and type efficiency (the efficiency which relates to modus operandi). This approach is new to the Islamic banking literature. The analysis is performed in two stages. The first stage employs DEA and MFA to compare banks on the basis of gross efficiency and its components (net and type). We find that Islamic banks are typically on a par with conventional ones in terms of gross efficiency, significantly higher on net efficiency and significantly lower on type efficiency. Second stage analyses, which account for banking environment and bank-level characteristics, confirm these results. The low type efficiency of Islamic banks could be attributed to lack of product standardization whereas high net efficiency reflects high managerial capability in Islamic banks. These findings are relevant to both policy-makers and regulators. In particular, Islamic banks should explore the benefits of moving to a more standardized system of banking, while the underperformance of conventional bank managers could be examined in the context of the on-going remuneration culture.

LanguageEnglish
PagesS93-S107
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume103
Early online date6 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Islamic financial institutions
Frontier analysis
Metafrontier
Banking
Data envelopment analysis
Islamic banking
Standardization
Remuneration
Decomposition
Managers
Underperformance
Politicians

Cite this

@article{2fd0dd7315ae4f3d9b39555600aa0803,
title = "A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004-2009",
abstract = "We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks during the period 2004-2009 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and meta-frontier analysis (MFA). The use of the non-parametric MFA allows for the decomposition of gross efficiency (i.e. the efficiency of banks when measured relative to a common frontier) into 2 components: net efficiency (the efficiency of banks measured relative to their own bank type frontier) and type efficiency (the efficiency which relates to modus operandi). This approach is new to the Islamic banking literature. The analysis is performed in two stages. The first stage employs DEA and MFA to compare banks on the basis of gross efficiency and its components (net and type). We find that Islamic banks are typically on a par with conventional ones in terms of gross efficiency, significantly higher on net efficiency and significantly lower on type efficiency. Second stage analyses, which account for banking environment and bank-level characteristics, confirm these results. The low type efficiency of Islamic banks could be attributed to lack of product standardization whereas high net efficiency reflects high managerial capability in Islamic banks. These findings are relevant to both policy-makers and regulators. In particular, Islamic banks should explore the benefits of moving to a more standardized system of banking, while the underperformance of conventional bank managers could be examined in the context of the on-going remuneration culture.",
keywords = "Banking sector, Data envelopment analysis, Efficiency, Islamic banking, Meta-frontier analysis",
author = "Jill Johnes and Marwan Izzeldin and Vasileios Pappas",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "S93--S107",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004-2009. / Johnes, Jill; Izzeldin, Marwan; Pappas, Vasileios.

In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 103, 07.2014, p. S93-S107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004-2009

AU - Johnes, Jill

AU - Izzeldin, Marwan

AU - Pappas, Vasileios

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks during the period 2004-2009 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and meta-frontier analysis (MFA). The use of the non-parametric MFA allows for the decomposition of gross efficiency (i.e. the efficiency of banks when measured relative to a common frontier) into 2 components: net efficiency (the efficiency of banks measured relative to their own bank type frontier) and type efficiency (the efficiency which relates to modus operandi). This approach is new to the Islamic banking literature. The analysis is performed in two stages. The first stage employs DEA and MFA to compare banks on the basis of gross efficiency and its components (net and type). We find that Islamic banks are typically on a par with conventional ones in terms of gross efficiency, significantly higher on net efficiency and significantly lower on type efficiency. Second stage analyses, which account for banking environment and bank-level characteristics, confirm these results. The low type efficiency of Islamic banks could be attributed to lack of product standardization whereas high net efficiency reflects high managerial capability in Islamic banks. These findings are relevant to both policy-makers and regulators. In particular, Islamic banks should explore the benefits of moving to a more standardized system of banking, while the underperformance of conventional bank managers could be examined in the context of the on-going remuneration culture.

AB - We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks during the period 2004-2009 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and meta-frontier analysis (MFA). The use of the non-parametric MFA allows for the decomposition of gross efficiency (i.e. the efficiency of banks when measured relative to a common frontier) into 2 components: net efficiency (the efficiency of banks measured relative to their own bank type frontier) and type efficiency (the efficiency which relates to modus operandi). This approach is new to the Islamic banking literature. The analysis is performed in two stages. The first stage employs DEA and MFA to compare banks on the basis of gross efficiency and its components (net and type). We find that Islamic banks are typically on a par with conventional ones in terms of gross efficiency, significantly higher on net efficiency and significantly lower on type efficiency. Second stage analyses, which account for banking environment and bank-level characteristics, confirm these results. The low type efficiency of Islamic banks could be attributed to lack of product standardization whereas high net efficiency reflects high managerial capability in Islamic banks. These findings are relevant to both policy-makers and regulators. In particular, Islamic banks should explore the benefits of moving to a more standardized system of banking, while the underperformance of conventional bank managers could be examined in the context of the on-going remuneration culture.

KW - Banking sector

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - Efficiency

KW - Islamic banking

KW - Meta-frontier analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904170584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.016

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - S93-S107

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

T2 - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -