A comparison of product costing practices in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing and continuous production process manufacturing

John A. Brierley, Christopher Cowton, Colin Drury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into product costing practice has not studied whether there are differences in product costing practice between different types of manufacturing. This paper compares the product costing practices of operating units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing, and continuous production process manufacturing. The results show that there are few differences in product costing practices between these two manufacturing methods. Similar proportions of operating units in these two manufacturing environments use similar methods to treat overheads and have similar experiences of activity-based costing. The only area of difference is in the use of overhead rates where significantly more units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing use a direct labour hour rate and significantly more units in continuous production process manufacturing use units produced and production time-based rates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-321
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume100
Issue number2
Early online date16 Feb 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Process manufacturing
Production process
Product costing
Manufacturing
Personnel
Labor
Proportion
Activity-based costing

Cite this

@article{9c93a92ddcde4f57a3dbf9f486aca021,
title = "A comparison of product costing practices in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing and continuous production process manufacturing",
abstract = "Research into product costing practice has not studied whether there are differences in product costing practice between different types of manufacturing. This paper compares the product costing practices of operating units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing, and continuous production process manufacturing. The results show that there are few differences in product costing practices between these two manufacturing methods. Similar proportions of operating units in these two manufacturing environments use similar methods to treat overheads and have similar experiences of activity-based costing. The only area of difference is in the use of overhead rates where significantly more units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing use a direct labour hour rate and significantly more units in continuous production process manufacturing use units produced and production time-based rates.",
keywords = "Product costing, Discrete-part and assembly manufacturing, Continuous production process manufacturing and activity-based costing",
author = "Brierley, {John A.} and Christopher Cowton and Colin Drury",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.020",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of product costing practices in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing and continuous production process manufacturing

AU - Brierley, John A.

AU - Cowton, Christopher

AU - Drury, Colin

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Research into product costing practice has not studied whether there are differences in product costing practice between different types of manufacturing. This paper compares the product costing practices of operating units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing, and continuous production process manufacturing. The results show that there are few differences in product costing practices between these two manufacturing methods. Similar proportions of operating units in these two manufacturing environments use similar methods to treat overheads and have similar experiences of activity-based costing. The only area of difference is in the use of overhead rates where significantly more units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing use a direct labour hour rate and significantly more units in continuous production process manufacturing use units produced and production time-based rates.

AB - Research into product costing practice has not studied whether there are differences in product costing practice between different types of manufacturing. This paper compares the product costing practices of operating units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing, and continuous production process manufacturing. The results show that there are few differences in product costing practices between these two manufacturing methods. Similar proportions of operating units in these two manufacturing environments use similar methods to treat overheads and have similar experiences of activity-based costing. The only area of difference is in the use of overhead rates where significantly more units in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing use a direct labour hour rate and significantly more units in continuous production process manufacturing use units produced and production time-based rates.

KW - Product costing

KW - Discrete-part and assembly manufacturing

KW - Continuous production process manufacturing and activity-based costing

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.020

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 2

ER -