TY - JOUR
T1 - A comprehensive approach to assess the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites
T2 - the Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona
AU - Gambilongo, Laura
AU - Chieffo, Nicola
AU - Lourenço, Paulo B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on). This publication is made possible with support from the J. Paul Getty Trust. The study has also been funded by the \u201CArchaeological Site Conservation and Management, Wupatki National Monument\u201D project through the Getty Foundation. The project was undertaken in collaboration with the Architectural Conservation Laboratory/Weitzman School of Design at the University of Pennsylvania. This work was also partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020, and under the Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE under reference LA/P/0112/2020. The FCT scholarship with reference 2022.09946.BD is also acknowledged. However, the opinions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organisations.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - The proposed research work presents a comprehensive approach to assessing the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites. This approach aims to be a quick and easy-to-use investigation procedure that enables accurate and large-scale evaluations. While the methods employed are well-established in the literature and have been widely applied to buildings, this study contributes by proposing a structured framework that integrates different assessment procedures at different levels of analysis, specifically tailored to archaeological sites. The analysis is divided into three stages within the conceptual framework: (i) the application of the Masonry Quality Index; (ii) seismic vulnerability assessment and prediction of expected damage; and (iii) analysis of individual walls’ structural response through strength domain, capacity and fragility curves. Specifically, the study explores and adapts four Vulnerability Index methods, i.e. GNDT, Formisano, Vicente and Ferreira methods, to suit the specific characteristics of archaeological sites. To this end, a simplified procedure is proposed to estimate the conventional strength in the methods’ forms. The comparison of the index-based methods is then crucial for critically evaluating the reliability of vulnerability estimations. The paper illustrates the application of this framework through a detailed case study, i.e. the archaeological site of Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona (US), demonstrating its effectiveness in evaluating the seismic risk and defining the vulnerability distribution of the site. Consequently, this approach facilitates the identification of the most sensitive areas, which necessitate further investigation, providing useful outcomes for the decision-making process concerning the conservation and protection of archaeological sites.
AB - The proposed research work presents a comprehensive approach to assessing the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites. This approach aims to be a quick and easy-to-use investigation procedure that enables accurate and large-scale evaluations. While the methods employed are well-established in the literature and have been widely applied to buildings, this study contributes by proposing a structured framework that integrates different assessment procedures at different levels of analysis, specifically tailored to archaeological sites. The analysis is divided into three stages within the conceptual framework: (i) the application of the Masonry Quality Index; (ii) seismic vulnerability assessment and prediction of expected damage; and (iii) analysis of individual walls’ structural response through strength domain, capacity and fragility curves. Specifically, the study explores and adapts four Vulnerability Index methods, i.e. GNDT, Formisano, Vicente and Ferreira methods, to suit the specific characteristics of archaeological sites. To this end, a simplified procedure is proposed to estimate the conventional strength in the methods’ forms. The comparison of the index-based methods is then crucial for critically evaluating the reliability of vulnerability estimations. The paper illustrates the application of this framework through a detailed case study, i.e. the archaeological site of Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona (US), demonstrating its effectiveness in evaluating the seismic risk and defining the vulnerability distribution of the site. Consequently, this approach facilitates the identification of the most sensitive areas, which necessitate further investigation, providing useful outcomes for the decision-making process concerning the conservation and protection of archaeological sites.
KW - Archaeological sites
KW - Fragility curves
KW - Historical masonry
KW - Seismic vulnerability assessment
KW - Shear force–displacement capacity curves
KW - Strength domains
KW - Vulnerability index methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194755782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9
DO - 10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194755782
VL - 22
SP - 4413
EP - 4445
JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
SN - 1570-761X
IS - 9
ER -