A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper a new criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications is proposed, which essentially is a strategy of estimating the empirical relationships of objects. Comparing with traditional methods given in GUM: 2008 and ISO 14253-1, this criterion improves the resolution of comparison by reducing the sizes of the coverage intervals to be compared. Interval order (a binary relation) is used for comparing the coverage intervals of the measurand and represents the empirical relations. The systematic effects of measurement are classified into two types: monotonic and non-monotonic effects, so that, without correcting the monotonic effects, a biased measurand can be specified to represent the empirical relations. Thereby the uncertainty components arising from the monotonic effects can be removed from the combined uncertainty. A strategy is given for determining the relationships among measurement results and specification limits. An example is given to demonstrate the application of the criterion.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing
PublisherElsevier
Pages143-148
Number of pages6
Volume27
ISBN (Electronic)9781510803015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing - Hangzhou, China
Duration: 11 May 201414 May 2014
Conference number: 13

Conference

Conference13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing
Abbreviated titleCAT 2014
CountryChina
CityHangzhou
Period11/05/1414/05/14

Fingerprint

Specifications
Uncertainty

Cite this

Ding, Hao ; Scott, Paul J. ; Jiang, X. / A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications. 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing. Vol. 27 Elsevier, 2015. pp. 143-148
@inproceedings{dc5427af54f14191a957692e4c50af83,
title = "A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications",
abstract = "In this paper a new criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications is proposed, which essentially is a strategy of estimating the empirical relationships of objects. Comparing with traditional methods given in GUM: 2008 and ISO 14253-1, this criterion improves the resolution of comparison by reducing the sizes of the coverage intervals to be compared. Interval order (a binary relation) is used for comparing the coverage intervals of the measurand and represents the empirical relations. The systematic effects of measurement are classified into two types: monotonic and non-monotonic effects, so that, without correcting the monotonic effects, a biased measurand can be specified to represent the empirical relations. Thereby the uncertainty components arising from the monotonic effects can be removed from the combined uncertainty. A strategy is given for determining the relationships among measurement results and specification limits. An example is given to demonstrate the application of the criterion.",
keywords = "Conformity with specifications, Interval order, Measurement uncertainty, Montonic effects, Systematic effects",
author = "Hao Ding and Scott, {Paul J.} and X. Jiang",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.057",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "143--148",
booktitle = "13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Ding, H, Scott, PJ & Jiang, X 2015, A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications. in 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing. vol. 27, Elsevier, pp. 143-148, 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Hangzhou, China, 11/05/14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.057

A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications. / Ding, Hao; Scott, Paul J.; Jiang, X.

13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing. Vol. 27 Elsevier, 2015. p. 143-148.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications

AU - Ding, Hao

AU - Scott, Paul J.

AU - Jiang, X.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this paper a new criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications is proposed, which essentially is a strategy of estimating the empirical relationships of objects. Comparing with traditional methods given in GUM: 2008 and ISO 14253-1, this criterion improves the resolution of comparison by reducing the sizes of the coverage intervals to be compared. Interval order (a binary relation) is used for comparing the coverage intervals of the measurand and represents the empirical relations. The systematic effects of measurement are classified into two types: monotonic and non-monotonic effects, so that, without correcting the monotonic effects, a biased measurand can be specified to represent the empirical relations. Thereby the uncertainty components arising from the monotonic effects can be removed from the combined uncertainty. A strategy is given for determining the relationships among measurement results and specification limits. An example is given to demonstrate the application of the criterion.

AB - In this paper a new criterion for comparing measurement results and determining conformity with specifications is proposed, which essentially is a strategy of estimating the empirical relationships of objects. Comparing with traditional methods given in GUM: 2008 and ISO 14253-1, this criterion improves the resolution of comparison by reducing the sizes of the coverage intervals to be compared. Interval order (a binary relation) is used for comparing the coverage intervals of the measurand and represents the empirical relations. The systematic effects of measurement are classified into two types: monotonic and non-monotonic effects, so that, without correcting the monotonic effects, a biased measurand can be specified to represent the empirical relations. Thereby the uncertainty components arising from the monotonic effects can be removed from the combined uncertainty. A strategy is given for determining the relationships among measurement results and specification limits. An example is given to demonstrate the application of the criterion.

KW - Conformity with specifications

KW - Interval order

KW - Measurement uncertainty

KW - Montonic effects

KW - Systematic effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939526978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.057

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.057

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 27

SP - 143

EP - 148

BT - 13th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing

PB - Elsevier

ER -