A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the challenges the researcher faced when undertaking ethnographic fieldwork within a Probation Approved Premises. How access to research sites is achieved is increasingly being discussed, particularly in ethnographic accounts. These discussions often focus on the practical and ethical challenges of entering fieldwork sites. In contrast, how researchers leave study populations or sites is rarely explored, although perhaps as complex and sensitive to negotiate as access. This article reflects upon the practical, ethical and emotional dilemmas experienced by the author when conducting research with sex offenders and staff in a probation hostel. The focus of the article is on how access was gained and how the site and the people who took part in the research were left at the end of the fieldwork. Key issues include: formal and informal gatekeepers to study sites; participants and forms of data; rapport; attachment to researchers and; deciding when to end fieldwork. Issues of gender are alluded to in this article, but will not be focussed on as they will be dealt with in detail elsewhere. It is concluded that negotiating access is different to gaining entry to a research site, and that these negotiations include considerations of the relationship between the researcher, the research and the researched.

LanguageEnglish
Pages315-331
Number of pages17
JournalQualitative Research
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010

Fingerprint

gatekeeper
probation
hostel
offender
Field Work
Gatekeeper
staff
gender

Cite this

@article{f3cad5c2691d4e82a7bdfdaa9ed33ed9,
title = "A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers",
abstract = "This article explores the challenges the researcher faced when undertaking ethnographic fieldwork within a Probation Approved Premises. How access to research sites is achieved is increasingly being discussed, particularly in ethnographic accounts. These discussions often focus on the practical and ethical challenges of entering fieldwork sites. In contrast, how researchers leave study populations or sites is rarely explored, although perhaps as complex and sensitive to negotiate as access. This article reflects upon the practical, ethical and emotional dilemmas experienced by the author when conducting research with sex offenders and staff in a probation hostel. The focus of the article is on how access was gained and how the site and the people who took part in the research were left at the end of the fieldwork. Key issues include: formal and informal gatekeepers to study sites; participants and forms of data; rapport; attachment to researchers and; deciding when to end fieldwork. Issues of gender are alluded to in this article, but will not be focussed on as they will be dealt with in detail elsewhere. It is concluded that negotiating access is different to gaining entry to a research site, and that these negotiations include considerations of the relationship between the researcher, the research and the researched.",
keywords = "Access, Ethnography, Exit, Fieldwork, Gatekeepers, Probation, Reflective, Sex offenders",
author = "Reeves, {Carla L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468794109360150",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "315--331",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

A difficult negotiation : Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. / Reeves, Carla L.

In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.06.2010, p. 315-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A difficult negotiation

T2 - Qualitative Research

AU - Reeves, Carla L.

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - This article explores the challenges the researcher faced when undertaking ethnographic fieldwork within a Probation Approved Premises. How access to research sites is achieved is increasingly being discussed, particularly in ethnographic accounts. These discussions often focus on the practical and ethical challenges of entering fieldwork sites. In contrast, how researchers leave study populations or sites is rarely explored, although perhaps as complex and sensitive to negotiate as access. This article reflects upon the practical, ethical and emotional dilemmas experienced by the author when conducting research with sex offenders and staff in a probation hostel. The focus of the article is on how access was gained and how the site and the people who took part in the research were left at the end of the fieldwork. Key issues include: formal and informal gatekeepers to study sites; participants and forms of data; rapport; attachment to researchers and; deciding when to end fieldwork. Issues of gender are alluded to in this article, but will not be focussed on as they will be dealt with in detail elsewhere. It is concluded that negotiating access is different to gaining entry to a research site, and that these negotiations include considerations of the relationship between the researcher, the research and the researched.

AB - This article explores the challenges the researcher faced when undertaking ethnographic fieldwork within a Probation Approved Premises. How access to research sites is achieved is increasingly being discussed, particularly in ethnographic accounts. These discussions often focus on the practical and ethical challenges of entering fieldwork sites. In contrast, how researchers leave study populations or sites is rarely explored, although perhaps as complex and sensitive to negotiate as access. This article reflects upon the practical, ethical and emotional dilemmas experienced by the author when conducting research with sex offenders and staff in a probation hostel. The focus of the article is on how access was gained and how the site and the people who took part in the research were left at the end of the fieldwork. Key issues include: formal and informal gatekeepers to study sites; participants and forms of data; rapport; attachment to researchers and; deciding when to end fieldwork. Issues of gender are alluded to in this article, but will not be focussed on as they will be dealt with in detail elsewhere. It is concluded that negotiating access is different to gaining entry to a research site, and that these negotiations include considerations of the relationship between the researcher, the research and the researched.

KW - Access

KW - Ethnography

KW - Exit

KW - Fieldwork

KW - Gatekeepers

KW - Probation

KW - Reflective

KW - Sex offenders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953567598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468794109360150

DO - 10.1177/1468794109360150

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 315

EP - 331

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 3

ER -