A marriage made in hell

Early intervention meets child protection

Brid Featherstone, Kate Morris, Sue White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we will argue for the moral legitimacy of support and its difference from intervention and the need to engage with and develop a family support project for the twenty-first century. We call for a debate on the current settlement between the state and family life and for a recognition that a perfect storm has ensued from the unholy alliance of early intervention and child protection. We will argue for a project that celebrates families' strengths as well as their vulnerabilities in the context of considerable adversities and (re) locates workers as agents of hope and support. We draw from a diverse set of literatures and disciplines to locate our arguments within a broader project occasioned by the economic crisis and questioning of the verities of neo-liberalism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1735-1749
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume44
Issue number7
Early online date19 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

child protection
Marriage
marriage
Hope
Illegitimacy
Politics
neoliberalism
economic crisis
twenty-first century
legitimacy
vulnerability
Economics
worker

Cite this

Featherstone, Brid ; Morris, Kate ; White, Sue. / A marriage made in hell : Early intervention meets child protection. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 7. pp. 1735-1749.
@article{483df3bfc8704f68af92ec667ad7ef09,
title = "A marriage made in hell: Early intervention meets child protection",
abstract = "In this article, we will argue for the moral legitimacy of support and its difference from intervention and the need to engage with and develop a family support project for the twenty-first century. We call for a debate on the current settlement between the state and family life and for a recognition that a perfect storm has ensued from the unholy alliance of early intervention and child protection. We will argue for a project that celebrates families' strengths as well as their vulnerabilities in the context of considerable adversities and (re) locates workers as agents of hope and support. We draw from a diverse set of literatures and disciplines to locate our arguments within a broader project occasioned by the economic crisis and questioning of the verities of neo-liberalism.",
keywords = "Child, family, inequality, protection, support",
author = "Brid Featherstone and Kate Morris and Sue White",
note = "No full text in Eprints. HN 16/11/2017",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bct052",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1735--1749",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

A marriage made in hell : Early intervention meets child protection. / Featherstone, Brid; Morris, Kate; White, Sue.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 44, No. 7, 01.10.2014, p. 1735-1749.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A marriage made in hell

T2 - Early intervention meets child protection

AU - Featherstone, Brid

AU - Morris, Kate

AU - White, Sue

N1 - No full text in Eprints. HN 16/11/2017

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - In this article, we will argue for the moral legitimacy of support and its difference from intervention and the need to engage with and develop a family support project for the twenty-first century. We call for a debate on the current settlement between the state and family life and for a recognition that a perfect storm has ensued from the unholy alliance of early intervention and child protection. We will argue for a project that celebrates families' strengths as well as their vulnerabilities in the context of considerable adversities and (re) locates workers as agents of hope and support. We draw from a diverse set of literatures and disciplines to locate our arguments within a broader project occasioned by the economic crisis and questioning of the verities of neo-liberalism.

AB - In this article, we will argue for the moral legitimacy of support and its difference from intervention and the need to engage with and develop a family support project for the twenty-first century. We call for a debate on the current settlement between the state and family life and for a recognition that a perfect storm has ensued from the unholy alliance of early intervention and child protection. We will argue for a project that celebrates families' strengths as well as their vulnerabilities in the context of considerable adversities and (re) locates workers as agents of hope and support. We draw from a diverse set of literatures and disciplines to locate our arguments within a broader project occasioned by the economic crisis and questioning of the verities of neo-liberalism.

KW - Child

KW - family

KW - inequality

KW - protection

KW - support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925011929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bct052

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bct052

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1735

EP - 1749

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 7

ER -