Abstract
The current study was a preliminary investigation that aimed to compare the performance of eyewitnesses with and without a brain injury on two target-absent line-up procedures: a simultaneous procedure and a sequential procedure with confidence ratings. A 2 × 2 design (N = 25) was employed, where both brain-injured (n = 15) and non-brain-injured (n = 10) participants were shown a short video of a non-violent crime taking place before taking part in either a simultaneous or sequential target-absent line-up. Participants’ general cognitive abilities and memory recall accuracy were also measured. Results found no significant differences in false identification rates between brain-injured and non-brain-injured witnesses. It was also found that participants with a greater memory accuracy were in fact more likely to make a false identification. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 480-495 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 9 Oct 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2019 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
A preliminary investigation on the performance of brain-injured witnesses on target-absent line-up procedures. / Gibert, Charlotte; Mojtahedi, Dara.
In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 26, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 480-495.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A preliminary investigation on the performance of brain-injured witnesses on target-absent line-up procedures.
AU - Gibert, Charlotte
AU - Mojtahedi, Dara
PY - 2019/5/4
Y1 - 2019/5/4
N2 - The current study was a preliminary investigation that aimed to compare the performance of eyewitnesses with and without a brain injury on two target-absent line-up procedures: a simultaneous procedure and a sequential procedure with confidence ratings. A 2 × 2 design (N = 25) was employed, where both brain-injured (n = 15) and non-brain-injured (n = 10) participants were shown a short video of a non-violent crime taking place before taking part in either a simultaneous or sequential target-absent line-up. Participants’ general cognitive abilities and memory recall accuracy were also measured. Results found no significant differences in false identification rates between brain-injured and non-brain-injured witnesses. It was also found that participants with a greater memory accuracy were in fact more likely to make a false identification. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
AB - The current study was a preliminary investigation that aimed to compare the performance of eyewitnesses with and without a brain injury on two target-absent line-up procedures: a simultaneous procedure and a sequential procedure with confidence ratings. A 2 × 2 design (N = 25) was employed, where both brain-injured (n = 15) and non-brain-injured (n = 10) participants were shown a short video of a non-violent crime taking place before taking part in either a simultaneous or sequential target-absent line-up. Participants’ general cognitive abilities and memory recall accuracy were also measured. Results found no significant differences in false identification rates between brain-injured and non-brain-injured witnesses. It was also found that participants with a greater memory accuracy were in fact more likely to make a false identification. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054724876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1507847
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1507847
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 480
EP - 495
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
T2 - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
SN - 1321-8719
IS - 3
ER -