A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program: A Qualitative Investigation from the Perspective of Excluders and Non-Excluders

Nerilee Hing, Barry Tolchard, Elaine Nuske, Louise Holdsworth, Margaret Tiyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper draws on a process evaluation of Queensland’ self-exclusion program to examine how people use the program, motivations for self-excluding, barriers to use, experiences and perceptions of program elements, and potential improvements. Detailed, reflective, first-person accounts were gathered through interviews with 103 problem gamblers, including excluders and non-excluders. Identified strengths include the program’s widespread availability. Many self-excluders reported positive experiences with responsive, knowledgeable, respectful venue staff. Major weaknesses include low publicity, limited privacy and confidentiality, the need to exclude individually from venues, and deficiencies in venue monitoring for breaches, which hinder the program’s capacity to meet harm minimisation objectives. While the program reaches some problem gamblers, others are delayed or deterred from self-excluding by low awareness, shame and embarrassment, difficulties of excluding from multiple venues, and low confidence in venue staff to maintain confidentiality and provide effective monitoring. Potential improvements include wider publicity, off-site multi-venue exclusion, and technology-assisted monitoring.
LanguageEnglish
Pages509-523
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date11 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Confidentiality
Harm Reduction
Shame
Queensland
Privacy
Motivation
Interviews
Technology

Cite this

@article{c35704abbac143588112d3e15151cb5d,
title = "A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program: A Qualitative Investigation from the Perspective of Excluders and Non-Excluders",
abstract = "This paper draws on a process evaluation of Queensland’ self-exclusion program to examine how people use the program, motivations for self-excluding, barriers to use, experiences and perceptions of program elements, and potential improvements. Detailed, reflective, first-person accounts were gathered through interviews with 103 problem gamblers, including excluders and non-excluders. Identified strengths include the program’s widespread availability. Many self-excluders reported positive experiences with responsive, knowledgeable, respectful venue staff. Major weaknesses include low publicity, limited privacy and confidentiality, the need to exclude individually from venues, and deficiencies in venue monitoring for breaches, which hinder the program’s capacity to meet harm minimisation objectives. While the program reaches some problem gamblers, others are delayed or deterred from self-excluding by low awareness, shame and embarrassment, difficulties of excluding from multiple venues, and low confidence in venue staff to maintain confidentiality and provide effective monitoring. Potential improvements include wider publicity, off-site multi-venue exclusion, and technology-assisted monitoring.",
keywords = "Self-exclusion, Process evaluation, Motivators, Barriers, Qualitative, Australia",
author = "Nerilee Hing and Barry Tolchard and Elaine Nuske and Louise Holdsworth and Margaret Tiyce",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11469-014-9482-5",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "509--523",
journal = "International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction",
issn = "1557-1874",
publisher = "Springer US",
number = "4",

}

A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program : A Qualitative Investigation from the Perspective of Excluders and Non-Excluders. / Hing, Nerilee; Tolchard, Barry; Nuske, Elaine; Holdsworth, Louise; Tiyce, Margaret.

In: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 12, No. 4, 08.2014, p. 509-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program

T2 - International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

AU - Hing, Nerilee

AU - Tolchard, Barry

AU - Nuske, Elaine

AU - Holdsworth, Louise

AU - Tiyce, Margaret

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - This paper draws on a process evaluation of Queensland’ self-exclusion program to examine how people use the program, motivations for self-excluding, barriers to use, experiences and perceptions of program elements, and potential improvements. Detailed, reflective, first-person accounts were gathered through interviews with 103 problem gamblers, including excluders and non-excluders. Identified strengths include the program’s widespread availability. Many self-excluders reported positive experiences with responsive, knowledgeable, respectful venue staff. Major weaknesses include low publicity, limited privacy and confidentiality, the need to exclude individually from venues, and deficiencies in venue monitoring for breaches, which hinder the program’s capacity to meet harm minimisation objectives. While the program reaches some problem gamblers, others are delayed or deterred from self-excluding by low awareness, shame and embarrassment, difficulties of excluding from multiple venues, and low confidence in venue staff to maintain confidentiality and provide effective monitoring. Potential improvements include wider publicity, off-site multi-venue exclusion, and technology-assisted monitoring.

AB - This paper draws on a process evaluation of Queensland’ self-exclusion program to examine how people use the program, motivations for self-excluding, barriers to use, experiences and perceptions of program elements, and potential improvements. Detailed, reflective, first-person accounts were gathered through interviews with 103 problem gamblers, including excluders and non-excluders. Identified strengths include the program’s widespread availability. Many self-excluders reported positive experiences with responsive, knowledgeable, respectful venue staff. Major weaknesses include low publicity, limited privacy and confidentiality, the need to exclude individually from venues, and deficiencies in venue monitoring for breaches, which hinder the program’s capacity to meet harm minimisation objectives. While the program reaches some problem gamblers, others are delayed or deterred from self-excluding by low awareness, shame and embarrassment, difficulties of excluding from multiple venues, and low confidence in venue staff to maintain confidentiality and provide effective monitoring. Potential improvements include wider publicity, off-site multi-venue exclusion, and technology-assisted monitoring.

KW - Self-exclusion

KW - Process evaluation

KW - Motivators

KW - Barriers

KW - Qualitative

KW - Australia

U2 - 10.1007/s11469-014-9482-5

DO - 10.1007/s11469-014-9482-5

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 509

EP - 523

JO - International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

JF - International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

SN - 1557-1874

IS - 4

ER -