A qualitative study of specialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home

G. Dowswell, J. Lawler, J. Young, A. Forster, J. Hearn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The involvement of five specialist nurses in providing a stroke support service was evaluated quantitatively in a recent randomized controlled trial. This complementary study used qualitative methods to evaluate trial outcomes more comprehensively. 

Aims: To identify whether the nurses' intervention may have influenced the process of stroke recovery. 

Method: A purposefully selected subsample of 30 patients and 15 care-givers were interviewed within 1-3 months of their final quantitative assessment (12 months after recruitment to the randomized trial). Fifteen of the patients and eight of the care-givers had received visits from a specialist nurse. A semi-structured interview was designed to include questions on perceptions of the recovery process and evaluation of services received. 

Results: Some differences were evident between the accounts of control and intervention group subjects. The less tangible aspects of nurses' interventions - concern, attention, empathy and interest, when combined with sound professional knowledge, had identifiable value to the patients and care-givers. It appeared that the nurses had employed considerable sensitivity and skill in identifying and responding to particular needs at appropriate times. 

Conclusion: The qualitative evaluation offers a different picture to the quantitative results of the randomized controlled trial. In general, the findings of the qualitative study are more positive and encouraging than the quantitative results. The majority of patients and care-givers in the intervention group believed that they had benefited from the specialist nurse's visits.

LanguageEnglish
Pages293-301
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Patient Care
Stroke
Nurses
Randomized Controlled Trials
Interviews
Control Groups
Nurse Specialists

Cite this

Dowswell, G. ; Lawler, J. ; Young, J. ; Forster, A. ; Hearn, J. / A qualitative study of specialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home. In: Clinical Rehabilitation. 1997 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 293-301.
@article{3820c3a92f89448fa5d0e7d263c1233d,
title = "A qualitative study of specialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home",
abstract = "Background: The involvement of five specialist nurses in providing a stroke support service was evaluated quantitatively in a recent randomized controlled trial. This complementary study used qualitative methods to evaluate trial outcomes more comprehensively. Aims: To identify whether the nurses' intervention may have influenced the process of stroke recovery. Method: A purposefully selected subsample of 30 patients and 15 care-givers were interviewed within 1-3 months of their final quantitative assessment (12 months after recruitment to the randomized trial). Fifteen of the patients and eight of the care-givers had received visits from a specialist nurse. A semi-structured interview was designed to include questions on perceptions of the recovery process and evaluation of services received. Results: Some differences were evident between the accounts of control and intervention group subjects. The less tangible aspects of nurses' interventions - concern, attention, empathy and interest, when combined with sound professional knowledge, had identifiable value to the patients and care-givers. It appeared that the nurses had employed considerable sensitivity and skill in identifying and responding to particular needs at appropriate times. Conclusion: The qualitative evaluation offers a different picture to the quantitative results of the randomized controlled trial. In general, the findings of the qualitative study are more positive and encouraging than the quantitative results. The majority of patients and care-givers in the intervention group believed that they had benefited from the specialist nurse's visits.",
author = "G. Dowswell and J. Lawler and J. Young and A. Forster and J. Hearn",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1177/026921559701100405",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "293--301",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

A qualitative study of specialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home. / Dowswell, G.; Lawler, J.; Young, J.; Forster, A.; Hearn, J.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1997, p. 293-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative study of specialist nurse support for stroke patients and care-givers at home

AU - Dowswell, G.

AU - Lawler, J.

AU - Young, J.

AU - Forster, A.

AU - Hearn, J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Background: The involvement of five specialist nurses in providing a stroke support service was evaluated quantitatively in a recent randomized controlled trial. This complementary study used qualitative methods to evaluate trial outcomes more comprehensively. Aims: To identify whether the nurses' intervention may have influenced the process of stroke recovery. Method: A purposefully selected subsample of 30 patients and 15 care-givers were interviewed within 1-3 months of their final quantitative assessment (12 months after recruitment to the randomized trial). Fifteen of the patients and eight of the care-givers had received visits from a specialist nurse. A semi-structured interview was designed to include questions on perceptions of the recovery process and evaluation of services received. Results: Some differences were evident between the accounts of control and intervention group subjects. The less tangible aspects of nurses' interventions - concern, attention, empathy and interest, when combined with sound professional knowledge, had identifiable value to the patients and care-givers. It appeared that the nurses had employed considerable sensitivity and skill in identifying and responding to particular needs at appropriate times. Conclusion: The qualitative evaluation offers a different picture to the quantitative results of the randomized controlled trial. In general, the findings of the qualitative study are more positive and encouraging than the quantitative results. The majority of patients and care-givers in the intervention group believed that they had benefited from the specialist nurse's visits.

AB - Background: The involvement of five specialist nurses in providing a stroke support service was evaluated quantitatively in a recent randomized controlled trial. This complementary study used qualitative methods to evaluate trial outcomes more comprehensively. Aims: To identify whether the nurses' intervention may have influenced the process of stroke recovery. Method: A purposefully selected subsample of 30 patients and 15 care-givers were interviewed within 1-3 months of their final quantitative assessment (12 months after recruitment to the randomized trial). Fifteen of the patients and eight of the care-givers had received visits from a specialist nurse. A semi-structured interview was designed to include questions on perceptions of the recovery process and evaluation of services received. Results: Some differences were evident between the accounts of control and intervention group subjects. The less tangible aspects of nurses' interventions - concern, attention, empathy and interest, when combined with sound professional knowledge, had identifiable value to the patients and care-givers. It appeared that the nurses had employed considerable sensitivity and skill in identifying and responding to particular needs at appropriate times. Conclusion: The qualitative evaluation offers a different picture to the quantitative results of the randomized controlled trial. In general, the findings of the qualitative study are more positive and encouraging than the quantitative results. The majority of patients and care-givers in the intervention group believed that they had benefited from the specialist nurse's visits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030719453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/cre

U2 - 10.1177/026921559701100405

DO - 10.1177/026921559701100405

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 293

EP - 301

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

T2 - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 4

ER -