A response to critics of lean construction

Glenn Ballard, Lauri Koskela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To reply to criticisms of lean construction made by Graham Winch in the 2nd edition of his Managing Construction Projects. Method: Reasoned argumentation from published statements. Findings: Winch’s criticisms of lean construction are based on misunderstandings. Limitations: Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Implications: Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which – through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980’s. Value for Practitioners: To invert a well-known saying: ‘There is nothing so impractical as a poor theory.’

LanguageEnglish
Pages13-22
Number of pages10
JournalLean Construction Journal
Volume2011
Issue numberSpecial Issue
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Winches
Management science
Education
Systems analysis
Industry

Cite this

Ballard, Glenn ; Koskela, Lauri. / A response to critics of lean construction. In: Lean Construction Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 2011, No. Special Issue. pp. 13-22.
@article{064ce3a14e1a4963a38e43401d656383,
title = "A response to critics of lean construction",
abstract = "Purpose: To reply to criticisms of lean construction made by Graham Winch in the 2nd edition of his Managing Construction Projects. Method: Reasoned argumentation from published statements. Findings: Winch’s criticisms of lean construction are based on misunderstandings. Limitations: Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Implications: Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which – through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980’s. Value for Practitioners: To invert a well-known saying: ‘There is nothing so impractical as a poor theory.’",
keywords = "Construction management, Lean construction, Theory",
author = "Glenn Ballard and Lauri Koskela",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2011",
pages = "13--22",
journal = "Lean Construction Journal",
issn = "1555-1369",
publisher = "Dipartimento di Filosofia e Beni Culturali, Universita Ca' Foscari",
number = "Special Issue",

}

Ballard, G & Koskela, L 2011, 'A response to critics of lean construction', Lean Construction Journal, vol. 2011, no. Special Issue, pp. 13-22.

A response to critics of lean construction. / Ballard, Glenn; Koskela, Lauri.

In: Lean Construction Journal, Vol. 2011, No. Special Issue, 01.01.2011, p. 13-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A response to critics of lean construction

AU - Ballard, Glenn

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To reply to criticisms of lean construction made by Graham Winch in the 2nd edition of his Managing Construction Projects. Method: Reasoned argumentation from published statements. Findings: Winch’s criticisms of lean construction are based on misunderstandings. Limitations: Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Implications: Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which – through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980’s. Value for Practitioners: To invert a well-known saying: ‘There is nothing so impractical as a poor theory.’

AB - Purpose: To reply to criticisms of lean construction made by Graham Winch in the 2nd edition of his Managing Construction Projects. Method: Reasoned argumentation from published statements. Findings: Winch’s criticisms of lean construction are based on misunderstandings. Limitations: Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Implications: Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which – through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980’s. Value for Practitioners: To invert a well-known saying: ‘There is nothing so impractical as a poor theory.’

KW - Construction management

KW - Lean construction

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026681199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2011

SP - 13

EP - 22

JO - Lean Construction Journal

T2 - Lean Construction Journal

JF - Lean Construction Journal

SN - 1555-1369

IS - Special Issue

ER -

Ballard G, Koskela L. A response to critics of lean construction. Lean Construction Journal. 2011 Jan 1;2011(Special Issue):13-22.