A response to critics of lean construction

Glenn Ballard, Lauri Koskela

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Lean construction advocates criticized the first edition of Graham Winch's Managing Construction Projects. In the 2nd edition, Winch responds and adds his own criticisms of lean construction. The purpose of this paper is to reply to Winch's criticisms of lean construction. Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which - through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980's.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011
Pages94-103
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction - Lima, Peru
Duration: 13 Jul 201115 Jul 2011
Conference number: 19

Conference

Conference19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Abbreviated titleIGLC'11
CountryPeru
CityLima
Period13/07/1115/07/11

Fingerprint

Winches
Management science
Education
Systems analysis
Industry

Cite this

Ballard, G., & Koskela, L. (2011). A response to critics of lean construction. In 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011 (pp. 94-103)
Ballard, Glenn ; Koskela, Lauri. / A response to critics of lean construction. 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. pp. 94-103
@inproceedings{cfaa0991d3ff4281b57b2647d59a345a,
title = "A response to critics of lean construction",
abstract = "Lean construction advocates criticized the first edition of Graham Winch's Managing Construction Projects. In the 2nd edition, Winch responds and adds his own criticisms of lean construction. The purpose of this paper is to reply to Winch's criticisms of lean construction. Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which - through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980's.",
keywords = "Construction management, Lean construction, Theory",
author = "Glenn Ballard and Lauri Koskela",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781622768233",
pages = "94--103",
booktitle = "19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011",

}

Ballard, G & Koskela, L 2011, A response to critics of lean construction. in 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. pp. 94-103, 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Lima, Peru, 13/07/11.

A response to critics of lean construction. / Ballard, Glenn; Koskela, Lauri.

19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. p. 94-103.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A response to critics of lean construction

AU - Ballard, Glenn

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Lean construction advocates criticized the first edition of Graham Winch's Managing Construction Projects. In the 2nd edition, Winch responds and adds his own criticisms of lean construction. The purpose of this paper is to reply to Winch's criticisms of lean construction. Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which - through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980's.

AB - Lean construction advocates criticized the first edition of Graham Winch's Managing Construction Projects. In the 2nd edition, Winch responds and adds his own criticisms of lean construction. The purpose of this paper is to reply to Winch's criticisms of lean construction. Other papers will continue the debate regarding the appropriate conceptualization of projects in relation to production, including the question whether organization design is part of production system design. Regarding the mainstream construction management community, we respectfully propose that it should get rid of certain temporal myopia. Two central concepts of lean construction are production, as a starting point for managing and organizing, and waste, as a focus of improvement. Winch denies the role of production in management and fails to recognize the importance of waste: it is not in the index of his book, although lean production and lean construction is discussed. This is fully aligned to other current literature in management, which - through silence - denies the role of production and waste. However, these concepts were present in the management literature preceding the two influential books on business education in 1959 (Gordon & Howell 1959, Pierson 1959). Lean construction represents a continuation of the discussion in the first half of the 20th century, which seems to have become opportune again as a result of the massive criticism on the lack of relevance of management science since the 1980's.

KW - Construction management

KW - Lean construction

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876764176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.proceedings.com/17147.html

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781622768233

SP - 94

EP - 103

BT - 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011

ER -

Ballard G, Koskela L. A response to critics of lean construction. In 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. p. 94-103