A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care

Felicity Astin, Lorraine Burey, Penny A Cook, Caroline O'donnell, Christi M. Deaton, Kieley Lewthwaite, Dan Terry, Sam Lacey, Jack Adams, Katy Rothwell, John Humpreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex and highly debilitating clinical syndrome. International guidelines identify the optimum clinical management of patients living with HF in primary care but translation of these into practice remains inadequate. The aim of this service evaluation is to measure standards of HF diagnosis and management, before and after the implementation of The Greater Manchester Heart Failure Investigation Tool (GM-HFIT), a facilitated ‘tool kit’ designed to optimise HF care. Methods: The GM-HFIT was developed as a means of assessing and improving care and was implemented as part of a facilitated service improvement and evaluation in primary care using a prospective, pre-test, post-test design. Results: Anonymised pre- and post-audit data were taken from a sample of 1130 cases entered on general practice HF registers. These cases were from two clinical commissioning groups (39 general practices) in the north west of England and were analysed to compare HF management and treatment parameters against clinical guidelines. Implementation of the GM-HFIT tool kit was associated with a reduction in the number of patients inappropriately placed on the HF register (p<0.001), an improvement in the recording and documentation of pulse rate and rhythm (p=0.005) and the proportion of patients receiving the target dose of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the recording and documentation of blood pressure levels or in documented target blood pressure levels across the time points. Conclusion: The introduction of the GM-HFIT kit was associated with statistically significant improvements in the identification and clinical management of patients diagnosed with HF in primary care.
LanguageEnglish
Pages588-596
JournalBritish Journal of Cardiac Nursing
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Heart Failure
General Practice
Documentation
Guidelines
Blood Pressure
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
England
Heart Rate

Cite this

Astin, Felicity ; Burey, Lorraine ; Cook, Penny A ; O'donnell, Caroline ; Deaton, Christi M. ; Lewthwaite, Kieley ; Terry, Dan ; Lacey, Sam ; Adams, Jack ; Rothwell, Katy ; Humpreys, John. / A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care. In: British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 12. pp. 588-596.
@article{c5e82854a0204f3a84c9689fe14b1bc6,
title = "A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care",
abstract = "Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex and highly debilitating clinical syndrome. International guidelines identify the optimum clinical management of patients living with HF in primary care but translation of these into practice remains inadequate. The aim of this service evaluation is to measure standards of HF diagnosis and management, before and after the implementation of The Greater Manchester Heart Failure Investigation Tool (GM-HFIT), a facilitated ‘tool kit’ designed to optimise HF care. Methods: The GM-HFIT was developed as a means of assessing and improving care and was implemented as part of a facilitated service improvement and evaluation in primary care using a prospective, pre-test, post-test design. Results: Anonymised pre- and post-audit data were taken from a sample of 1130 cases entered on general practice HF registers. These cases were from two clinical commissioning groups (39 general practices) in the north west of England and were analysed to compare HF management and treatment parameters against clinical guidelines. Implementation of the GM-HFIT tool kit was associated with a reduction in the number of patients inappropriately placed on the HF register (p<0.001), an improvement in the recording and documentation of pulse rate and rhythm (p=0.005) and the proportion of patients receiving the target dose of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the recording and documentation of blood pressure levels or in documented target blood pressure levels across the time points. Conclusion: The introduction of the GM-HFIT kit was associated with statistically significant improvements in the identification and clinical management of patients diagnosed with HF in primary care.",
author = "Felicity Astin and Lorraine Burey and Cook, {Penny A} and Caroline O'donnell and Deaton, {Christi M.} and Kieley Lewthwaite and Dan Terry and Sam Lacey and Jack Adams and Katy Rothwell and John Humpreys",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "6",
doi = "10.12968/bjca.2016.11.12.588",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "588--596",
journal = "British Journal of Cardiac Nursing",
issn = "1749-6403",
publisher = "Mark Allen Healthcare",
number = "12",

}

Astin, F, Burey, L, Cook, PA, O'donnell, C, Deaton, CM, Lewthwaite, K, Terry, D, Lacey, S, Adams, J, Rothwell, K & Humpreys, J 2016, 'A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care', British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 588-596. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2016.11.12.588

A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care. / Astin, Felicity; Burey, Lorraine; Cook, Penny A; O'donnell, Caroline; Deaton, Christi M.; Lewthwaite, Kieley; Terry, Dan; Lacey, Sam; Adams, Jack; Rothwell, Katy; Humpreys, John.

In: British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, Vol. 11, No. 12, 06.12.2016, p. 588-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A service improvement ‘tool kit’ for effective heart failure management in primary care

AU - Astin, Felicity

AU - Burey, Lorraine

AU - Cook, Penny A

AU - O'donnell, Caroline

AU - Deaton, Christi M.

AU - Lewthwaite, Kieley

AU - Terry, Dan

AU - Lacey, Sam

AU - Adams, Jack

AU - Rothwell, Katy

AU - Humpreys, John

PY - 2016/12/6

Y1 - 2016/12/6

N2 - Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex and highly debilitating clinical syndrome. International guidelines identify the optimum clinical management of patients living with HF in primary care but translation of these into practice remains inadequate. The aim of this service evaluation is to measure standards of HF diagnosis and management, before and after the implementation of The Greater Manchester Heart Failure Investigation Tool (GM-HFIT), a facilitated ‘tool kit’ designed to optimise HF care. Methods: The GM-HFIT was developed as a means of assessing and improving care and was implemented as part of a facilitated service improvement and evaluation in primary care using a prospective, pre-test, post-test design. Results: Anonymised pre- and post-audit data were taken from a sample of 1130 cases entered on general practice HF registers. These cases were from two clinical commissioning groups (39 general practices) in the north west of England and were analysed to compare HF management and treatment parameters against clinical guidelines. Implementation of the GM-HFIT tool kit was associated with a reduction in the number of patients inappropriately placed on the HF register (p<0.001), an improvement in the recording and documentation of pulse rate and rhythm (p=0.005) and the proportion of patients receiving the target dose of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the recording and documentation of blood pressure levels or in documented target blood pressure levels across the time points. Conclusion: The introduction of the GM-HFIT kit was associated with statistically significant improvements in the identification and clinical management of patients diagnosed with HF in primary care.

AB - Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex and highly debilitating clinical syndrome. International guidelines identify the optimum clinical management of patients living with HF in primary care but translation of these into practice remains inadequate. The aim of this service evaluation is to measure standards of HF diagnosis and management, before and after the implementation of The Greater Manchester Heart Failure Investigation Tool (GM-HFIT), a facilitated ‘tool kit’ designed to optimise HF care. Methods: The GM-HFIT was developed as a means of assessing and improving care and was implemented as part of a facilitated service improvement and evaluation in primary care using a prospective, pre-test, post-test design. Results: Anonymised pre- and post-audit data were taken from a sample of 1130 cases entered on general practice HF registers. These cases were from two clinical commissioning groups (39 general practices) in the north west of England and were analysed to compare HF management and treatment parameters against clinical guidelines. Implementation of the GM-HFIT tool kit was associated with a reduction in the number of patients inappropriately placed on the HF register (p<0.001), an improvement in the recording and documentation of pulse rate and rhythm (p=0.005) and the proportion of patients receiving the target dose of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the recording and documentation of blood pressure levels or in documented target blood pressure levels across the time points. Conclusion: The introduction of the GM-HFIT kit was associated with statistically significant improvements in the identification and clinical management of patients diagnosed with HF in primary care.

U2 - 10.12968/bjca.2016.11.12.588

DO - 10.12968/bjca.2016.11.12.588

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 588

EP - 596

JO - British Journal of Cardiac Nursing

T2 - British Journal of Cardiac Nursing

JF - British Journal of Cardiac Nursing

SN - 1749-6403

IS - 12

ER -