Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of the micro‐expressions training tool (METT) in identifying and using micro‐expressions to improve lie detection. Participants (n = 90) were randomly assigned to receive training in micro‐expressions recognition, a bogus control training, or no training. All participants made veracity judgements of five randomly selected videos of targets providing deceptive or truthful statements. With the use of the Bayesian analyses, we found that the METT group did not outperform those in the bogus training and no training groups. Further, overall accuracy was slightly below chance. Implications of these results are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 222-235 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Aug 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A test of the micro-expressions training tool: Does it improve lie detection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Christopher Street
- Department of Psychology - Reader
- School of Human and Health Sciences
- The Centre for Cognition and Neuroscience - Co-Director
- Secure Societies Institute - Member
- Centre for Applied Psychological Research - Associate Member
Person: Academic