Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 222-235 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Aug 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
A test of the micro-expressions training tool : Does it improve lie detection? / Jordan, Sarah; Brimbal, Laure; Wallace, D. Brian; Kassin, Saul M.; Hartwig, Maria; Street, Chris N. H.
In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.10.2019, p. 222-235.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A test of the micro-expressions training tool
T2 - Does it improve lie detection?
AU - Jordan, Sarah
AU - Brimbal, Laure
AU - Wallace, D. Brian
AU - Kassin, Saul M.
AU - Hartwig, Maria
AU - Street, Chris N. H.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of the micro‐expressions training tool (METT) in identifying and using micro‐expressions to improve lie detection. Participants (n = 90) were randomly assigned to receive training in micro‐expressions recognition, a bogus control training, or no training. All participants made veracity judgements of five randomly selected videos of targets providing deceptive or truthful statements. With the use of the Bayesian analyses, we found that the METT group did not outperform those in the bogus training and no training groups. Further, overall accuracy was slightly below chance. Implications of these results are discussed.
AB - The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of the micro‐expressions training tool (METT) in identifying and using micro‐expressions to improve lie detection. Participants (n = 90) were randomly assigned to receive training in micro‐expressions recognition, a bogus control training, or no training. All participants made veracity judgements of five randomly selected videos of targets providing deceptive or truthful statements. With the use of the Bayesian analyses, we found that the METT group did not outperform those in the bogus training and no training groups. Further, overall accuracy was slightly below chance. Implications of these results are discussed.
KW - micro-expressions
KW - lie detection
KW - deception
KW - emotion
KW - SPOT
KW - security
KW - facial expression
KW - micro-expressions training tool
KW - training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070901241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jip.1532
DO - 10.1002/jip.1532
M3 - Article
VL - 16
SP - 222
EP - 235
JO - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
JF - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
SN - 1544-4759
IS - 3
ER -