A unified formulation for mechanical joints with and without clearances/bushings and/or stops in the framework of multibody systems

Jorge Ambrósio, João Pombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Virtually all machines and mechanisms use mechanical joints that are not perfect from the kinematic point of view and for which tolerances, in the fitting of their components, are specified. Together with such controlled clearances, mechanical joints may require the use of bushing elements, such as those used in vehicle suspensions. Furthermore, in many situations the joints exhibit limits (stops) in their translational or rotational motion that have to be taken into account when modeling them. The dynamic response of the mechanical systems that use such realistic mechanical joints is largely dependent on their characteristic dimensions and material properties of the compliant elements, implying that correct models of these systems must include realistic models of the bushing/clearance joints and of the joint stops. Several works addressed the modeling of imperfect joints to account for the existence of clearances and bushings, generally independently of the formulation of the perfect kinematic joints. This work proposes a formulation in which both perfect and clearance/bushing joints share the same kinematic information making their modeling data similar and enabling their easy permutation in the context of multibody systems modeling. The proposed methodology is suitable for the most common mechanical joints and easily extended to many other joint types benefiting the exploration of a wide number of modeling applications, including the representation of cut-joints required for some formulations in multibody dynamics. The formulation presented in this work is applied to several demonstrative examples of spatial mechanisms to show the need to consider the type of imperfect joints and/or joints with stops modeling in practical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-345
Number of pages29
JournalMultibody System Dynamics
Volume42
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bushings
Multibody Systems
Clearance
Kinematics
Formulation
Modeling
Imperfect
Vehicle suspensions
Multibody Dynamics
Data Modeling
Dynamic Response
System Modeling
Mechanical Systems
Material Properties
Dynamic response
Tolerance
Data structures
Materials properties
Permutation
Motion

Cite this

@article{fd19861a3c0a49f5a1b1248b06ed5637,
title = "A unified formulation for mechanical joints with and without clearances/bushings and/or stops in the framework of multibody systems",
abstract = "Virtually all machines and mechanisms use mechanical joints that are not perfect from the kinematic point of view and for which tolerances, in the fitting of their components, are specified. Together with such controlled clearances, mechanical joints may require the use of bushing elements, such as those used in vehicle suspensions. Furthermore, in many situations the joints exhibit limits (stops) in their translational or rotational motion that have to be taken into account when modeling them. The dynamic response of the mechanical systems that use such realistic mechanical joints is largely dependent on their characteristic dimensions and material properties of the compliant elements, implying that correct models of these systems must include realistic models of the bushing/clearance joints and of the joint stops. Several works addressed the modeling of imperfect joints to account for the existence of clearances and bushings, generally independently of the formulation of the perfect kinematic joints. This work proposes a formulation in which both perfect and clearance/bushing joints share the same kinematic information making their modeling data similar and enabling their easy permutation in the context of multibody systems modeling. The proposed methodology is suitable for the most common mechanical joints and easily extended to many other joint types benefiting the exploration of a wide number of modeling applications, including the representation of cut-joints required for some formulations in multibody dynamics. The formulation presented in this work is applied to several demonstrative examples of spatial mechanisms to show the need to consider the type of imperfect joints and/or joints with stops modeling in practical applications.",
keywords = "Bushing Joints, Clearance Joints, Constraint Violation, Joint Stops, Kinematic Joints, Numerical Efficiency",
author = "Jorge Ambr{\'o}sio and Jo{\~a}o Pombo",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11044-018-9613-z",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "317--345",
journal = "Multibody System Dynamics",
issn = "1384-5640",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

A unified formulation for mechanical joints with and without clearances/bushings and/or stops in the framework of multibody systems. / Ambrósio, Jorge; Pombo, João.

In: Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 03.2018, p. 317-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A unified formulation for mechanical joints with and without clearances/bushings and/or stops in the framework of multibody systems

AU - Ambrósio, Jorge

AU - Pombo, João

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Virtually all machines and mechanisms use mechanical joints that are not perfect from the kinematic point of view and for which tolerances, in the fitting of their components, are specified. Together with such controlled clearances, mechanical joints may require the use of bushing elements, such as those used in vehicle suspensions. Furthermore, in many situations the joints exhibit limits (stops) in their translational or rotational motion that have to be taken into account when modeling them. The dynamic response of the mechanical systems that use such realistic mechanical joints is largely dependent on their characteristic dimensions and material properties of the compliant elements, implying that correct models of these systems must include realistic models of the bushing/clearance joints and of the joint stops. Several works addressed the modeling of imperfect joints to account for the existence of clearances and bushings, generally independently of the formulation of the perfect kinematic joints. This work proposes a formulation in which both perfect and clearance/bushing joints share the same kinematic information making their modeling data similar and enabling their easy permutation in the context of multibody systems modeling. The proposed methodology is suitable for the most common mechanical joints and easily extended to many other joint types benefiting the exploration of a wide number of modeling applications, including the representation of cut-joints required for some formulations in multibody dynamics. The formulation presented in this work is applied to several demonstrative examples of spatial mechanisms to show the need to consider the type of imperfect joints and/or joints with stops modeling in practical applications.

AB - Virtually all machines and mechanisms use mechanical joints that are not perfect from the kinematic point of view and for which tolerances, in the fitting of their components, are specified. Together with such controlled clearances, mechanical joints may require the use of bushing elements, such as those used in vehicle suspensions. Furthermore, in many situations the joints exhibit limits (stops) in their translational or rotational motion that have to be taken into account when modeling them. The dynamic response of the mechanical systems that use such realistic mechanical joints is largely dependent on their characteristic dimensions and material properties of the compliant elements, implying that correct models of these systems must include realistic models of the bushing/clearance joints and of the joint stops. Several works addressed the modeling of imperfect joints to account for the existence of clearances and bushings, generally independently of the formulation of the perfect kinematic joints. This work proposes a formulation in which both perfect and clearance/bushing joints share the same kinematic information making their modeling data similar and enabling their easy permutation in the context of multibody systems modeling. The proposed methodology is suitable for the most common mechanical joints and easily extended to many other joint types benefiting the exploration of a wide number of modeling applications, including the representation of cut-joints required for some formulations in multibody dynamics. The formulation presented in this work is applied to several demonstrative examples of spatial mechanisms to show the need to consider the type of imperfect joints and/or joints with stops modeling in practical applications.

KW - Bushing Joints

KW - Clearance Joints

KW - Constraint Violation

KW - Joint Stops

KW - Kinematic Joints

KW - Numerical Efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041238999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11044-018-9613-z

DO - 10.1007/s11044-018-9613-z

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 317

EP - 345

JO - Multibody System Dynamics

JF - Multibody System Dynamics

SN - 1384-5640

IS - 3

ER -