Abjection interrogated: Uncovering the relation between abjection and disgust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection, as propounded in Powers of Horror, emphasises the centrality of the repulsion caused by bodily experience in human life, and explains behaviours in and attitudes to our environment. The phenomenology of abjection bears similarities to the phenomenology of disgust. Both involve physical feelings of repulsion caused by a source, and the concomitant need to reject the source in various ways. Abjection is conceptualized within a psychoanalytic framework where it refers to the repudiation of the maternal prior to the production of an autonomous subject, and the subsequent rejection of disgusting substances in later life. But apart from its role in such a psychoanalytic account, are there any other significant differences that exist between abjection and disgust, or are we looking at a distinction without a difference?
LanguageEnglish
Pages48-61
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Extreme Anthropology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disgust
Abjection
Phenomenology
Rejection
Human Life
Julia Kristeva
Centrality
Physical
Repudiation
Bodily Experience

Cite this

@article{762e614a8af3459699289a9134ee56d9,
title = "Abjection interrogated: Uncovering the relation between abjection and disgust",
abstract = "Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection, as propounded in Powers of Horror, emphasises the centrality of the repulsion caused by bodily experience in human life, and explains behaviours in and attitudes to our environment. The phenomenology of abjection bears similarities to the phenomenology of disgust. Both involve physical feelings of repulsion caused by a source, and the concomitant need to reject the source in various ways. Abjection is conceptualized within a psychoanalytic framework where it refers to the repudiation of the maternal prior to the production of an autonomous subject, and the subsequent rejection of disgusting substances in later life. But apart from its role in such a psychoanalytic account, are there any other significant differences that exist between abjection and disgust, or are we looking at a distinction without a difference?",
keywords = "abjection, disgust, Kristeva, horror, repulsion",
author = "Rina Arya",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5617/jea.4337",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "48--61",
journal = "Journal of Extreme Anthropology",
issn = "2535-3241",
number = "1",

}

Abjection interrogated : Uncovering the relation between abjection and disgust. / Arya, Rina.

In: Journal of Extreme Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.08.2017, p. 48-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abjection interrogated

T2 - Journal of Extreme Anthropology

AU - Arya, Rina

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection, as propounded in Powers of Horror, emphasises the centrality of the repulsion caused by bodily experience in human life, and explains behaviours in and attitudes to our environment. The phenomenology of abjection bears similarities to the phenomenology of disgust. Both involve physical feelings of repulsion caused by a source, and the concomitant need to reject the source in various ways. Abjection is conceptualized within a psychoanalytic framework where it refers to the repudiation of the maternal prior to the production of an autonomous subject, and the subsequent rejection of disgusting substances in later life. But apart from its role in such a psychoanalytic account, are there any other significant differences that exist between abjection and disgust, or are we looking at a distinction without a difference?

AB - Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection, as propounded in Powers of Horror, emphasises the centrality of the repulsion caused by bodily experience in human life, and explains behaviours in and attitudes to our environment. The phenomenology of abjection bears similarities to the phenomenology of disgust. Both involve physical feelings of repulsion caused by a source, and the concomitant need to reject the source in various ways. Abjection is conceptualized within a psychoanalytic framework where it refers to the repudiation of the maternal prior to the production of an autonomous subject, and the subsequent rejection of disgusting substances in later life. But apart from its role in such a psychoanalytic account, are there any other significant differences that exist between abjection and disgust, or are we looking at a distinction without a difference?

KW - abjection

KW - disgust

KW - Kristeva

KW - horror

KW - repulsion

U2 - 10.5617/jea.4337

DO - 10.5617/jea.4337

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 48

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Extreme Anthropology

JF - Journal of Extreme Anthropology

SN - 2535-3241

IS - 1

ER -