Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Estimation in Eyes Having Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Rubina Rahman, Chun Xiao Bong, John Stephenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Methods: Retrospective case review of 100 consecutive eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Axial lengths were measured using optical biometry and/or ultrasound A-scan. Achieved and predicted refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error and the mean absolute prediction error. Factorial analysis of variance models were developed to assess outcome on the whole and that between the subgroups.
Results: Ninety-five eyes had postoperative refraction: 41 macula-on (43%) and 54 macula-off (57%). The mean postoperative prediction error was −0.34 ± 0.89 diopters. There was no statistical significant difference in the refractive outcomes between macula-on and macula-off groups (P > 0.05). Overall, using mean absolute prediction error as the outcome measure, optical biometry was more accurate than ultrasound (P = 0.040). However, significantly more ultrasound-measured axial lengths were selected for intraocular lens power estimation in macula-off group compared with the macula-on group (P = 0.016).
Conclusion: Combined phacovitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included a small biometric error that was within the tolerable range in most cases. Both optical biometry and ultrasound should be used to estimate axial lengths, for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, to improve the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1415-1420
Number of pages6
JournalRetina
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lenses
Retinal Detachment
Biometry
Refractive Errors
Analysis of Variance
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

@article{987a309e6d434f1e8a906abe961f37b7,
title = "Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Estimation in Eyes Having Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Methods: Retrospective case review of 100 consecutive eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Axial lengths were measured using optical biometry and/or ultrasound A-scan. Achieved and predicted refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error and the mean absolute prediction error. Factorial analysis of variance models were developed to assess outcome on the whole and that between the subgroups.Results: Ninety-five eyes had postoperative refraction: 41 macula-on (43{\%}) and 54 macula-off (57{\%}). The mean postoperative prediction error was −0.34 ± 0.89 diopters. There was no statistical significant difference in the refractive outcomes between macula-on and macula-off groups (P > 0.05). Overall, using mean absolute prediction error as the outcome measure, optical biometry was more accurate than ultrasound (P = 0.040). However, significantly more ultrasound-measured axial lengths were selected for intraocular lens power estimation in macula-off group compared with the macula-on group (P = 0.016).Conclusion: Combined phacovitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included a small biometric error that was within the tolerable range in most cases. Both optical biometry and ultrasound should be used to estimate axial lengths, for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, to improve the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation.",
keywords = "biometry, phacovitrectomy, rhegmatogenous retinal detachments",
author = "Rubina Rahman and Bong, {Chun Xiao} and John Stephenson",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/IAE.0000000000000072",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1415--1420",
journal = "Retina",
issn = "0275-004X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Estimation in Eyes Having Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. / Rahman, Rubina; Bong, Chun Xiao; Stephenson, John.

In: Retina, Vol. 34, No. 7, 07.2014, p. 1415-1420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Estimation in Eyes Having Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

AU - Rahman, Rubina

AU - Bong, Chun Xiao

AU - Stephenson, John

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Methods: Retrospective case review of 100 consecutive eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Axial lengths were measured using optical biometry and/or ultrasound A-scan. Achieved and predicted refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error and the mean absolute prediction error. Factorial analysis of variance models were developed to assess outcome on the whole and that between the subgroups.Results: Ninety-five eyes had postoperative refraction: 41 macula-on (43%) and 54 macula-off (57%). The mean postoperative prediction error was −0.34 ± 0.89 diopters. There was no statistical significant difference in the refractive outcomes between macula-on and macula-off groups (P > 0.05). Overall, using mean absolute prediction error as the outcome measure, optical biometry was more accurate than ultrasound (P = 0.040). However, significantly more ultrasound-measured axial lengths were selected for intraocular lens power estimation in macula-off group compared with the macula-on group (P = 0.016).Conclusion: Combined phacovitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included a small biometric error that was within the tolerable range in most cases. Both optical biometry and ultrasound should be used to estimate axial lengths, for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, to improve the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Methods: Retrospective case review of 100 consecutive eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Axial lengths were measured using optical biometry and/or ultrasound A-scan. Achieved and predicted refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error and the mean absolute prediction error. Factorial analysis of variance models were developed to assess outcome on the whole and that between the subgroups.Results: Ninety-five eyes had postoperative refraction: 41 macula-on (43%) and 54 macula-off (57%). The mean postoperative prediction error was −0.34 ± 0.89 diopters. There was no statistical significant difference in the refractive outcomes between macula-on and macula-off groups (P > 0.05). Overall, using mean absolute prediction error as the outcome measure, optical biometry was more accurate than ultrasound (P = 0.040). However, significantly more ultrasound-measured axial lengths were selected for intraocular lens power estimation in macula-off group compared with the macula-on group (P = 0.016).Conclusion: Combined phacovitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included a small biometric error that was within the tolerable range in most cases. Both optical biometry and ultrasound should be used to estimate axial lengths, for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, to improve the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation.

KW - biometry

KW - phacovitrectomy

KW - rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000072

DO - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000072

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1415

EP - 1420

JO - Retina

T2 - Retina

JF - Retina

SN - 0275-004X

IS - 7

ER -