Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions

Petko Kusev, Paul van Schaik, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, Asgeir Juliusson, Nick Chater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When attempting to predict future events, people commonly rely on historical data. One psychological characteristic of judgmental forecasting of time series, established by research, is that when people make forecasts from series, they tend to underestimate future values for upward trends and overestimate them for downward ones, so-called trend-damping (modeled by anchoring on, and insufficient adjustment from, the average of recent time series values). Events in a time series can be experienced sequentially (dynamic mode), or they can also be retrospectively viewed simultaneously (static mode), not experienced individually in real time. In one experiment, we studied the influence of presentation mode (dynamic and static) on two sorts of judgment: (a) predictions of the next event (forecast) and (b) estimation of the average value of all the events in the presented series (average estimation). Participants' responses in dynamic mode were anchored on more recent events than in static mode for all types of judgment but with different consequences; hence, dynamic presentation improved prediction accuracy, but not estimation. These results are not anticipated by existing theoretical accounts; we develop and present an agent-based model—the adaptive anchoring model (ADAM)—to account for the difference between processing sequences of dynamically and statically presented stimuli (visually presented data). ADAM captures how variation in presentation mode produces variation in responses (and the accuracy of these responses) in both forecasting and judgment tasks. ADAM's model predictions for the forecasting and judgment tasks fit better with the response data than a linear-regression time series model. Moreover, ADAM outperformed autoregressive-integrated-moving-average (ARIMA) and exponential-smoothing models, while neither of these models accounts for people's responses on the average estimation task.
LanguageEnglish
Pages77-102
JournalCognitive Science
Volume42
Early online date6 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Time series
Social Adjustment
Linear Models
Psychology
Linear regression
Research
Damping
Processing
Experiments

Cite this

Kusev, Petko ; van Schaik, Paul ; Tsaneva-Atanasova, Krasimira ; Juliusson, Asgeir ; Chater, Nick. / Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions. In: Cognitive Science. 2018 ; Vol. 42. pp. 77-102.
@article{c0db3a4163ca4cc28b85ea905f1d7473,
title = "Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions",
abstract = "When attempting to predict future events, people commonly rely on historical data. One psychological characteristic of judgmental forecasting of time series, established by research, is that when people make forecasts from series, they tend to underestimate future values for upward trends and overestimate them for downward ones, so-called trend-damping (modeled by anchoring on, and insufficient adjustment from, the average of recent time series values). Events in a time series can be experienced sequentially (dynamic mode), or they can also be retrospectively viewed simultaneously (static mode), not experienced individually in real time. In one experiment, we studied the influence of presentation mode (dynamic and static) on two sorts of judgment: (a) predictions of the next event (forecast) and (b) estimation of the average value of all the events in the presented series (average estimation). Participants' responses in dynamic mode were anchored on more recent events than in static mode for all types of judgment but with different consequences; hence, dynamic presentation improved prediction accuracy, but not estimation. These results are not anticipated by existing theoretical accounts; we develop and present an agent-based model—the adaptive anchoring model (ADAM)—to account for the difference between processing sequences of dynamically and statically presented stimuli (visually presented data). ADAM captures how variation in presentation mode produces variation in responses (and the accuracy of these responses) in both forecasting and judgment tasks. ADAM's model predictions for the forecasting and judgment tasks fit better with the response data than a linear-regression time series model. Moreover, ADAM outperformed autoregressive-integrated-moving-average (ARIMA) and exponential-smoothing models, while neither of these models accounts for people's responses on the average estimation task.",
keywords = "Judgment, Prediction, Experience, Description, Trend, Behavioral forecasting",
author = "Petko Kusev and {van Schaik}, Paul and Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova and Asgeir Juliusson and Nick Chater",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1111/cogs.12476",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "77--102",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions. / Kusev, Petko; van Schaik, Paul; Tsaneva-Atanasova, Krasimira; Juliusson, Asgeir; Chater, Nick.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 42, 25.01.2018, p. 77-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions

AU - Kusev,Petko

AU - van Schaik,Paul

AU - Tsaneva-Atanasova,Krasimira

AU - Juliusson,Asgeir

AU - Chater,Nick

PY - 2018/1/25

Y1 - 2018/1/25

N2 - When attempting to predict future events, people commonly rely on historical data. One psychological characteristic of judgmental forecasting of time series, established by research, is that when people make forecasts from series, they tend to underestimate future values for upward trends and overestimate them for downward ones, so-called trend-damping (modeled by anchoring on, and insufficient adjustment from, the average of recent time series values). Events in a time series can be experienced sequentially (dynamic mode), or they can also be retrospectively viewed simultaneously (static mode), not experienced individually in real time. In one experiment, we studied the influence of presentation mode (dynamic and static) on two sorts of judgment: (a) predictions of the next event (forecast) and (b) estimation of the average value of all the events in the presented series (average estimation). Participants' responses in dynamic mode were anchored on more recent events than in static mode for all types of judgment but with different consequences; hence, dynamic presentation improved prediction accuracy, but not estimation. These results are not anticipated by existing theoretical accounts; we develop and present an agent-based model—the adaptive anchoring model (ADAM)—to account for the difference between processing sequences of dynamically and statically presented stimuli (visually presented data). ADAM captures how variation in presentation mode produces variation in responses (and the accuracy of these responses) in both forecasting and judgment tasks. ADAM's model predictions for the forecasting and judgment tasks fit better with the response data than a linear-regression time series model. Moreover, ADAM outperformed autoregressive-integrated-moving-average (ARIMA) and exponential-smoothing models, while neither of these models accounts for people's responses on the average estimation task.

AB - When attempting to predict future events, people commonly rely on historical data. One psychological characteristic of judgmental forecasting of time series, established by research, is that when people make forecasts from series, they tend to underestimate future values for upward trends and overestimate them for downward ones, so-called trend-damping (modeled by anchoring on, and insufficient adjustment from, the average of recent time series values). Events in a time series can be experienced sequentially (dynamic mode), or they can also be retrospectively viewed simultaneously (static mode), not experienced individually in real time. In one experiment, we studied the influence of presentation mode (dynamic and static) on two sorts of judgment: (a) predictions of the next event (forecast) and (b) estimation of the average value of all the events in the presented series (average estimation). Participants' responses in dynamic mode were anchored on more recent events than in static mode for all types of judgment but with different consequences; hence, dynamic presentation improved prediction accuracy, but not estimation. These results are not anticipated by existing theoretical accounts; we develop and present an agent-based model—the adaptive anchoring model (ADAM)—to account for the difference between processing sequences of dynamically and statically presented stimuli (visually presented data). ADAM captures how variation in presentation mode produces variation in responses (and the accuracy of these responses) in both forecasting and judgment tasks. ADAM's model predictions for the forecasting and judgment tasks fit better with the response data than a linear-regression time series model. Moreover, ADAM outperformed autoregressive-integrated-moving-average (ARIMA) and exponential-smoothing models, while neither of these models accounts for people's responses on the average estimation task.

KW - Judgment

KW - Prediction

KW - Experience

KW - Description

KW - Trend

KW - Behavioral forecasting

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1551-6709

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.12476

DO - 10.1111/cogs.12476

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 77

EP - 102

JO - Cognitive Science

T2 - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

ER -