Age effects on juvenile homicide perpetration

Laura Hammond, Maria Ioannou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– In order to address a notable gap in the research literature, the purpose of this paper is to examine age-related differences in juvenile homicide perpetration.

Design/methodology/approach
– Data on 150 juvenile homicide offenders and their offences was derived from material available within the public domain, including media reports, case studies, court reports and previously published studies. Comparisons were then made between those aged 14 and under (n=63) and those aged 14-17 (n=87) across a range of offender, victim and offence-related variables.

Findings
– There were no significant differences between the child (U-14) and adolescent (14-17) offender samples on any of the measured variables. The two groups had similar backgrounds, selected similar types of victims, had comparable breakdowns of different types of victim-offender relationship and had similar patterns of weapon use.

Research limitations/implications
– The fact that the two groups did not differ significantly has notable implications in practical and applied domains. By identifying risk factors for juvenile homicide perpetration, findings open up a range of possibilities for identification, investigation and intervention. In addition, findings might inform the development of offender treatment and rehabilitation programmes. Key limitations relate to the quality and quantity of data employed. Ways of remedying these weaknesses in future research are addressed.

Originality/value
– This is the first study to directly compare child and adolescent perpetrators of homicide over a broad range of offender, victim and offence attributes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-176
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Criminal Psychology
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Age effects on juvenile homicide perpetration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this