Abstract
No cabe duda de que vivimos un momento sociocomunicativo bastanteparticular. Manifestaciones contemporáneas puntuales como la tercerafase del proceso social de la globalización (Sassen, 2007), la crisis delEstado nación (Held, 2008), la consolidación de la sociedad en red(Castells, 2009), la profunda crisis del modelo neoliberal (Beck, 2009),la nueva sociedad de la información (Stevenson, 2012) y el advenimientode una sociedad líquida (Bauman, 2013) han permeado las distintas di-mensiones de la estructura social, creando un nuevo marco de derechos y deberes desde los cuales ciudadanos y movimientos sociales hanvenido focalizando su acción política y comunicativa en los últimos años.Igualmente, en décadas recientes, términos como ciudadanías globales(Falk, 1994), ciudadanías mediáticas (Castells, 1997), ciudadanías cul-turales (Stevenson, 2003), ciudadanías sexuales (Plummer, 2003), ciu-dadanías cosmopolitas (Held, 2004), ciudadanías ecológicas (Dobson,2004), ciudadanías transnacionales (Vertovec, 2009) o ciudadaníastransgénero (Monro, 2010) han querido llamar la atención sobre las nue- vas formas con las cuales los ciudadanos buscan reclamar, apropiarse, vivir,expresar o experimentar nuevos niveles de ciudadanía y de acción políticaa través de la conformación de movimientos sociales de cuarta generación(Keane, 2003), algunos de ellos muy ligados a la apropiación de las nuevastecnologías y en especial al uso del internet.
There is no doubt that we are living in a very particular socio-communicative moment. Specific contemporary manifestations such as the third phase of the social process of globalization (Sassen, 2007), the crisis of the nation-state (Held, 2008), the consolidation of the network society (Castells, 2009), the deep crisis of the neoliberal model (Beck, 2009), the new information society (Stevenson, 2012) and the advent of a liquid society (Bauman, 2013) have permeated the different dimensions of the social structure, creating a new framework of rights and duties from which citizens and Social movements have been focusing their political and communicative action in recent years; likewise, in recent decades, terms such as global citizenships (Falk, 1994), media citizenships (Castells, 1997), cultural citizenships (Stevenson, 2003), sexual citizenships (Plummer, 2003), cosmopolitan cities (Held, 2004), ecological citizenships (Dobson, 2004), transnational citizenships (Vertovec, 2009) or transgender citizenships (Monro, 2010) have wanted to call the attention to the new ways in which citizens seek to claim, appropriate, live, express or experience new levels of citizenship and political action through the formation of fourth-generation social movements (Keane, 2003), some of them closely linked to the appropriation of new technologies and especially to the use of the internet.
There is no doubt that we are living in a very particular socio-communicative moment. Specific contemporary manifestations such as the third phase of the social process of globalization (Sassen, 2007), the crisis of the nation-state (Held, 2008), the consolidation of the network society (Castells, 2009), the deep crisis of the neoliberal model (Beck, 2009), the new information society (Stevenson, 2012) and the advent of a liquid society (Bauman, 2013) have permeated the different dimensions of the social structure, creating a new framework of rights and duties from which citizens and Social movements have been focusing their political and communicative action in recent years; likewise, in recent decades, terms such as global citizenships (Falk, 1994), media citizenships (Castells, 1997), cultural citizenships (Stevenson, 2003), sexual citizenships (Plummer, 2003), cosmopolitan cities (Held, 2004), ecological citizenships (Dobson, 2004), transnational citizenships (Vertovec, 2009) or transgender citizenships (Monro, 2010) have wanted to call the attention to the new ways in which citizens seek to claim, appropriate, live, express or experience new levels of citizenship and political action through the formation of fourth-generation social movements (Keane, 2003), some of them closely linked to the appropriation of new technologies and especially to the use of the internet.
Translated title of the contribution | Unfinished agendas for ambiguous objects: three theoretical and methodological challenges for the relationship between culture, new technologies and power in emerging contexts |
---|---|
Original language | Spanish |
Title of host publication | Tecnologías de la visibilidad |
Subtitle of host publication | Reconfiguraciones contemporáneas de la comunicación y la política en el siglo XXI |
Editors | Camilo Tamayo Gómez, Jorge Iván Bonilla Vélez , Ana Cristina Vélez López |
Publisher | Universidad EAFIT |
Pages | 23-39 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789587204032 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |