ALIED

Humans as adaptive lie detectors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People make for poor lie detectors. They have accuracy rates comparable to a coin toss, and come with a set of systematic biases that sway the judgment. This pessimistic view stands in contrast to research showing that people make informed decisions that adapt to the context they operate in. The current article proposes a new theoretical direction for lie detection research. I argue that lie detectors make informed, adaptive judgments in a low-diagnostic world. This Adaptive Lie Detector (ALIED) account is outlined by drawing on supporting evidence from across various psychological literatures. The account is contrasted with longstanding and more recent accounts of the judgment process, which propose that people fall back on default ways of thinking. Limitations of the account are considered, and future research directions are outlined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-343
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume4
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lie Detection
Numismatics
Research
Psychology
Direction compound
Thinking

Cite this

@article{fc3a0ff2fcfd4fe8845bb0b32dc9ebc3,
title = "ALIED: Humans as adaptive lie detectors",
abstract = "People make for poor lie detectors. They have accuracy rates comparable to a coin toss, and come with a set of systematic biases that sway the judgment. This pessimistic view stands in contrast to research showing that people make informed decisions that adapt to the context they operate in. The current article proposes a new theoretical direction for lie detection research. I argue that lie detectors make informed, adaptive judgments in a low-diagnostic world. This Adaptive Lie Detector (ALIED) account is outlined by drawing on supporting evidence from across various psychological literatures. The account is contrasted with longstanding and more recent accounts of the judgment process, which propose that people fall back on default ways of thinking. Limitations of the account are considered, and future research directions are outlined.",
keywords = "Deception detection, Truth bias, Adaptive lie detector, Uncertainty, Adaptive decision making, Truth-default theory",
author = "Chris Street",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "335--343",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

ALIED : Humans as adaptive lie detectors. / Street, Chris.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 4, No. 4, 12.2015, p. 335-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ALIED

T2 - Humans as adaptive lie detectors

AU - Street, Chris

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - People make for poor lie detectors. They have accuracy rates comparable to a coin toss, and come with a set of systematic biases that sway the judgment. This pessimistic view stands in contrast to research showing that people make informed decisions that adapt to the context they operate in. The current article proposes a new theoretical direction for lie detection research. I argue that lie detectors make informed, adaptive judgments in a low-diagnostic world. This Adaptive Lie Detector (ALIED) account is outlined by drawing on supporting evidence from across various psychological literatures. The account is contrasted with longstanding and more recent accounts of the judgment process, which propose that people fall back on default ways of thinking. Limitations of the account are considered, and future research directions are outlined.

AB - People make for poor lie detectors. They have accuracy rates comparable to a coin toss, and come with a set of systematic biases that sway the judgment. This pessimistic view stands in contrast to research showing that people make informed decisions that adapt to the context they operate in. The current article proposes a new theoretical direction for lie detection research. I argue that lie detectors make informed, adaptive judgments in a low-diagnostic world. This Adaptive Lie Detector (ALIED) account is outlined by drawing on supporting evidence from across various psychological literatures. The account is contrasted with longstanding and more recent accounts of the judgment process, which propose that people fall back on default ways of thinking. Limitations of the account are considered, and future research directions are outlined.

KW - Deception detection

KW - Truth bias

KW - Adaptive lie detector

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Adaptive decision making

KW - Truth-default theory

UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-applied-research-in-memory-and-cognition/

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 335

EP - 343

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 4

ER -