Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing: Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I want to consider how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan today, e.g. checking-in online to keep up with fannish news and fan friends, waiting for anticipated new television episodes, seasons or films to be released, and becoming immersed in fictional worlds via “binge-watching” or re-viewing. Although psychoanalysis dates to the nineteenth-century writings of Sigmund Freud, recent cultural critics using this kind of approach have tended to favour a “psychosocial” variant (Woodward 2015) which pays attention to social contexts and factors as well as matters of the psyche. In this instance, I will use “psychoanalytic” and “psychosocial” interchangeably, though it should be noted that there has been intense debate on the exact differences between these two terms (Hollway and Jefferson 2013). Considering the psychosocial ramifications of 24/7 “always-on” and readily accessible fandom, I will argue that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age (Booth 2016: 104). While scholarship may rightly critique the gender (and other cultural) politics of fans’ antagonisms, psychoanalysis offers a way of understanding the underlying psychosocial processes at play here. By contrast, I will analyze fans’ seemingly unproductive waiting for beloved media texts as a more harmonious version of community building, before concluding with an examination of binge-watching as a possible containment of anxiety that also displays “hyperconsumerism” (Hassler-Forest 2016: 41).
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Companion to Media Fandom
EditorsMelissa Click, Suzanne Scott
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter2
Pages18-26
Number of pages9
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781315637518
ISBN (Print)9781138638921, 1138638927
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

psychoanalytic theory
fan
experience
psyche
everyday experience
antagonism
aggression
community
critic
television
nineteenth century
news
Psychoanalysis
anxiety
examination
politics
gender
Group

Cite this

Hills, M. (2018). Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing: Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences. In M. Click, & S. Scott (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (1 ed., pp. 18-26). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637518-4
Hills, Matthew. / Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing : Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences. The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom. editor / Melissa Click ; Suzanne Scott. 1. ed. New York : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. pp. 18-26
@inbook{18f15c9609894bbb9c1a54c081583bc9,
title = "Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing: Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' {"}Infra-Ordinary' Experiences",
abstract = "In this chapter, I want to consider how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan today, e.g. checking-in online to keep up with fannish news and fan friends, waiting for anticipated new television episodes, seasons or films to be released, and becoming immersed in fictional worlds via “binge-watching” or re-viewing. Although psychoanalysis dates to the nineteenth-century writings of Sigmund Freud, recent cultural critics using this kind of approach have tended to favour a “psychosocial” variant (Woodward 2015) which pays attention to social contexts and factors as well as matters of the psyche. In this instance, I will use “psychoanalytic” and “psychosocial” interchangeably, though it should be noted that there has been intense debate on the exact differences between these two terms (Hollway and Jefferson 2013). Considering the psychosocial ramifications of 24/7 “always-on” and readily accessible fandom, I will argue that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age (Booth 2016: 104). While scholarship may rightly critique the gender (and other cultural) politics of fans’ antagonisms, psychoanalysis offers a way of understanding the underlying psychosocial processes at play here. By contrast, I will analyze fans’ seemingly unproductive waiting for beloved media texts as a more harmonious version of community building, before concluding with an examination of binge-watching as a possible containment of anxiety that also displays “hyperconsumerism” (Hassler-Forest 2016: 41).",
keywords = "Fandom, Media",
author = "Matthew Hills",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315637518-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138638921",
pages = "18--26",
editor = "Melissa Click and Suzanne Scott",
booktitle = "The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
edition = "1",

}

Hills, M 2018, Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing: Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences. in M Click & S Scott (eds), The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom. 1 edn, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 18-26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637518-4

Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing : Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences. / Hills, Matthew.

The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom. ed. / Melissa Click; Suzanne Scott. 1. ed. New York : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. p. 18-26.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing

T2 - Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences

AU - Hills, Matthew

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this chapter, I want to consider how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan today, e.g. checking-in online to keep up with fannish news and fan friends, waiting for anticipated new television episodes, seasons or films to be released, and becoming immersed in fictional worlds via “binge-watching” or re-viewing. Although psychoanalysis dates to the nineteenth-century writings of Sigmund Freud, recent cultural critics using this kind of approach have tended to favour a “psychosocial” variant (Woodward 2015) which pays attention to social contexts and factors as well as matters of the psyche. In this instance, I will use “psychoanalytic” and “psychosocial” interchangeably, though it should be noted that there has been intense debate on the exact differences between these two terms (Hollway and Jefferson 2013). Considering the psychosocial ramifications of 24/7 “always-on” and readily accessible fandom, I will argue that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age (Booth 2016: 104). While scholarship may rightly critique the gender (and other cultural) politics of fans’ antagonisms, psychoanalysis offers a way of understanding the underlying psychosocial processes at play here. By contrast, I will analyze fans’ seemingly unproductive waiting for beloved media texts as a more harmonious version of community building, before concluding with an examination of binge-watching as a possible containment of anxiety that also displays “hyperconsumerism” (Hassler-Forest 2016: 41).

AB - In this chapter, I want to consider how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan today, e.g. checking-in online to keep up with fannish news and fan friends, waiting for anticipated new television episodes, seasons or films to be released, and becoming immersed in fictional worlds via “binge-watching” or re-viewing. Although psychoanalysis dates to the nineteenth-century writings of Sigmund Freud, recent cultural critics using this kind of approach have tended to favour a “psychosocial” variant (Woodward 2015) which pays attention to social contexts and factors as well as matters of the psyche. In this instance, I will use “psychoanalytic” and “psychosocial” interchangeably, though it should be noted that there has been intense debate on the exact differences between these two terms (Hollway and Jefferson 2013). Considering the psychosocial ramifications of 24/7 “always-on” and readily accessible fandom, I will argue that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age (Booth 2016: 104). While scholarship may rightly critique the gender (and other cultural) politics of fans’ antagonisms, psychoanalysis offers a way of understanding the underlying psychosocial processes at play here. By contrast, I will analyze fans’ seemingly unproductive waiting for beloved media texts as a more harmonious version of community building, before concluding with an examination of binge-watching as a possible containment of anxiety that also displays “hyperconsumerism” (Hassler-Forest 2016: 41).

KW - Fandom

KW - Media

UR - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317268260

U2 - 10.4324/9781315637518-4

DO - 10.4324/9781315637518-4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138638921

SN - 1138638927

SP - 18

EP - 26

BT - The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom

A2 - Click, Melissa

A2 - Scott, Suzanne

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - New York

ER -

Hills M. Always-On Fandom, Waiting and Bingeing: Psychoanalysis as an Engagement with Fans' "Infra-Ordinary' Experiences. In Click M, Scott S, editors, The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom. 1 ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2018. p. 18-26 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637518-4