An alternative proposition to Lewis’ views on the ‘Constructions of professional identity in a dynamic higher education sector’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper offers an alternative proposition to that of Lewis on identity and professional identity in higher education (HE). The proposition is provided from the narratives of 26 individual interviewees who deliver HE in college-based higher education, a viewpoint not considered by Lewis, who tends to adopt a more generalist view. Where Lewis blames the demise of HE on academics, the alternative is considered where it is the managerialist and marketisation practiced by managers and administrators alike that may be the cause of this demise, introducing what is often referred to as the ‘McDonaldization of HE’. The paper considers Lewis’ views that the Association of University Administrators should have more power and take the lead on managing academics and HE, but finds the arguments both weak and tentative; subsequently one argues that the subjects Lewis discusses are ‘wicked problems’ with little or no real opportunity for resolution.

LanguageEnglish
Pages324-343
Number of pages20
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

education
manager
narrative
cause

Cite this

@article{396d2cc9cfa4450c921f30033cd5dd65,
title = "An alternative proposition to Lewis’ views on the ‘Constructions of professional identity in a dynamic higher education sector’",
abstract = "This paper offers an alternative proposition to that of Lewis on identity and professional identity in higher education (HE). The proposition is provided from the narratives of 26 individual interviewees who deliver HE in college-based higher education, a viewpoint not considered by Lewis, who tends to adopt a more generalist view. Where Lewis blames the demise of HE on academics, the alternative is considered where it is the managerialist and marketisation practiced by managers and administrators alike that may be the cause of this demise, introducing what is often referred to as the ‘McDonaldization of HE’. The paper considers Lewis’ views that the Association of University Administrators should have more power and take the lead on managing academics and HE, but finds the arguments both weak and tentative; subsequently one argues that the subjects Lewis discusses are ‘wicked problems’ with little or no real opportunity for resolution.",
keywords = "academic identity, administration, higher education, managerialism, professionalism",
author = "Denis Feather",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13596748.2015.1063300",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "324--343",
journal = "Research in Post-Compulsory Education",
issn = "1359-6748",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An alternative proposition to Lewis’ views on the ‘Constructions of professional identity in a dynamic higher education sector’

AU - Feather, Denis

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - This paper offers an alternative proposition to that of Lewis on identity and professional identity in higher education (HE). The proposition is provided from the narratives of 26 individual interviewees who deliver HE in college-based higher education, a viewpoint not considered by Lewis, who tends to adopt a more generalist view. Where Lewis blames the demise of HE on academics, the alternative is considered where it is the managerialist and marketisation practiced by managers and administrators alike that may be the cause of this demise, introducing what is often referred to as the ‘McDonaldization of HE’. The paper considers Lewis’ views that the Association of University Administrators should have more power and take the lead on managing academics and HE, but finds the arguments both weak and tentative; subsequently one argues that the subjects Lewis discusses are ‘wicked problems’ with little or no real opportunity for resolution.

AB - This paper offers an alternative proposition to that of Lewis on identity and professional identity in higher education (HE). The proposition is provided from the narratives of 26 individual interviewees who deliver HE in college-based higher education, a viewpoint not considered by Lewis, who tends to adopt a more generalist view. Where Lewis blames the demise of HE on academics, the alternative is considered where it is the managerialist and marketisation practiced by managers and administrators alike that may be the cause of this demise, introducing what is often referred to as the ‘McDonaldization of HE’. The paper considers Lewis’ views that the Association of University Administrators should have more power and take the lead on managing academics and HE, but finds the arguments both weak and tentative; subsequently one argues that the subjects Lewis discusses are ‘wicked problems’ with little or no real opportunity for resolution.

KW - academic identity

KW - administration

KW - higher education

KW - managerialism

KW - professionalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940175549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13596748.2015.1063300

DO - 10.1080/13596748.2015.1063300

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 324

EP - 343

JO - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

T2 - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

JF - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

SN - 1359-6748

IS - 3

ER -