An assessment technique for the evaluation and promotion of sustainable Olympic design and urban development

Adrian Pitts, Hanwen Liao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A response is presented to the dilemma of hosting resource-intensive large-scale sporting events at a time when requirements for sustainability and sustainable development must also be met. A framework was devised for judging development and design issues for future planning, one which is based upon extant historic evidence from host city experiences as well as previous event outcomes. It offers potential to compare plans against best/optimal practice. The technique for appraisal arises from a detailed analysis of Olympic Games held since 1896. Data associated with venue design, construction and usage, athletes' accommodation, and the facilities for officials, the media and visitors/spectators, were amassed and reviewed. An evaluation technique was produced which demonstrates how the organizers of a modern Olympic Games can assess and reflect upon planning, design and development decisions associated with their own city from an early outline stage. This should permit less wasteful, more appropriate and more sustainable Games' infrastructures to be considered before complex detailed development occurs.
LanguageEnglish
Pages722-734
Number of pages13
JournalBuilding Research and Information
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Planning
Ecodesign

Cite this

@article{d813a7c4b3c34850ba9af0832db9870e,
title = "An assessment technique for the evaluation and promotion of sustainable Olympic design and urban development",
abstract = "A response is presented to the dilemma of hosting resource-intensive large-scale sporting events at a time when requirements for sustainability and sustainable development must also be met. A framework was devised for judging development and design issues for future planning, one which is based upon extant historic evidence from host city experiences as well as previous event outcomes. It offers potential to compare plans against best/optimal practice. The technique for appraisal arises from a detailed analysis of Olympic Games held since 1896. Data associated with venue design, construction and usage, athletes' accommodation, and the facilities for officials, the media and visitors/spectators, were amassed and reviewed. An evaluation technique was produced which demonstrates how the organizers of a modern Olympic Games can assess and reflect upon planning, design and development decisions associated with their own city from an early outline stage. This should permit less wasteful, more appropriate and more sustainable Games' infrastructures to be considered before complex detailed development occurs.",
keywords = "environmental assessment, evaluation framework, Oympic Games, sustainable design, Urban Development",
author = "Adrian Pitts and Hanwen Liao",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/09613218.2013.790590",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "722--734",
journal = "Building Research and Information",
issn = "0961-3218",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

An assessment technique for the evaluation and promotion of sustainable Olympic design and urban development. / Pitts, Adrian; Liao, Hanwen.

In: Building Research and Information, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2013, p. 722-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment technique for the evaluation and promotion of sustainable Olympic design and urban development

AU - Pitts, Adrian

AU - Liao, Hanwen

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A response is presented to the dilemma of hosting resource-intensive large-scale sporting events at a time when requirements for sustainability and sustainable development must also be met. A framework was devised for judging development and design issues for future planning, one which is based upon extant historic evidence from host city experiences as well as previous event outcomes. It offers potential to compare plans against best/optimal practice. The technique for appraisal arises from a detailed analysis of Olympic Games held since 1896. Data associated with venue design, construction and usage, athletes' accommodation, and the facilities for officials, the media and visitors/spectators, were amassed and reviewed. An evaluation technique was produced which demonstrates how the organizers of a modern Olympic Games can assess and reflect upon planning, design and development decisions associated with their own city from an early outline stage. This should permit less wasteful, more appropriate and more sustainable Games' infrastructures to be considered before complex detailed development occurs.

AB - A response is presented to the dilemma of hosting resource-intensive large-scale sporting events at a time when requirements for sustainability and sustainable development must also be met. A framework was devised for judging development and design issues for future planning, one which is based upon extant historic evidence from host city experiences as well as previous event outcomes. It offers potential to compare plans against best/optimal practice. The technique for appraisal arises from a detailed analysis of Olympic Games held since 1896. Data associated with venue design, construction and usage, athletes' accommodation, and the facilities for officials, the media and visitors/spectators, were amassed and reviewed. An evaluation technique was produced which demonstrates how the organizers of a modern Olympic Games can assess and reflect upon planning, design and development decisions associated with their own city from an early outline stage. This should permit less wasteful, more appropriate and more sustainable Games' infrastructures to be considered before complex detailed development occurs.

KW - environmental assessment

KW - evaluation framework

KW - Oympic Games

KW - sustainable design

KW - Urban Development

U2 - 10.1080/09613218.2013.790590

DO - 10.1080/09613218.2013.790590

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 722

EP - 734

JO - Building Research and Information

T2 - Building Research and Information

JF - Building Research and Information

SN - 0961-3218

IS - 6

ER -