An Australian longitudinal pilot study examining health determinants of cardiac outcomes 12months post percutaneous coronary intervention

Karen Leigh Edward, John Stephenson, Jo Ann Giandinoto, Andrew Wilson, Robert Whitbourn, Jack Gutman, Andrew Newcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very common revascularisation procedure for coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac outcomes, health related quality of life (HRQoL), resilience and adherence behaviours in patients who have undergone a PCI at two time points (6 and 12months) following their procedure. Methods: A longitudinal pilot study was conducted to observe the cardiac outcomes across a cohort of patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants who had undergone PCI 6months prior were invited. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent then completed a telephone survey (time point 1). These participants were then contacted 6months later (i.e. 12 months post-intervention, time point 2) and the measures were repeated. Results: All patients (n=51) were recorded as being alive at time point 1. The multiple model indicated that controlling for other factors, gender was significantly associated with a linear combination of outcome measures (p=0.004). The effect was moderate in magnitude (partial-η2=0.303), where males performed significantly better than females 6months after the PCI procedure physically and with mood. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs indicated that gender differences were grounded in the scale measuring depression (PHQ9) (p=0.005) and the physical component score of the short form measuring HRQoL (SF12-PCS) (p = 0.003). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up between time points 1 and 2. One patient was confirmed to have passed away. The pattern of correlations between outcome measures at time point 2 revealed statistically significant negative correlation between the PHQ instrument and the resilience scale (CD-RISC) (r=-0.611; p < 0.001); and the physical component score of the SF-12 instrument (r=-0.437; p = 0.054). Conclusions: Men were performing better than women in the 6 months post-PCI, particularly in the areas of mood (depression) and physical health. This pilot results indicate gender-sensitive practices are recommended particularly up to 6months post-PCI. Any gender differences observed at 6 month appear to disappear at 12months post-PCI. Further research into the management of mood particularly for women post-PCI is warranted. A more detailed inquiry related to access/attendance to secondary prevention is also warranted.

LanguageEnglish
Article number31
JournalBMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Longitudinal Studies
Health
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Depression
Lost to Follow-Up
Secondary Prevention
Telephone
Coronary Artery Disease
Analysis of Variance
Research

Cite this

Edward, Karen Leigh ; Stephenson, John ; Giandinoto, Jo Ann ; Wilson, Andrew ; Whitbourn, Robert ; Gutman, Jack ; Newcomb, Andrew. / An Australian longitudinal pilot study examining health determinants of cardiac outcomes 12months post percutaneous coronary intervention. In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{c7dd694ad01e4b8dbb574663e7255538,
title = "An Australian longitudinal pilot study examining health determinants of cardiac outcomes 12months post percutaneous coronary intervention",
abstract = "Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very common revascularisation procedure for coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac outcomes, health related quality of life (HRQoL), resilience and adherence behaviours in patients who have undergone a PCI at two time points (6 and 12months) following their procedure. Methods: A longitudinal pilot study was conducted to observe the cardiac outcomes across a cohort of patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants who had undergone PCI 6months prior were invited. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent then completed a telephone survey (time point 1). These participants were then contacted 6months later (i.e. 12 months post-intervention, time point 2) and the measures were repeated. Results: All patients (n=51) were recorded as being alive at time point 1. The multiple model indicated that controlling for other factors, gender was significantly associated with a linear combination of outcome measures (p=0.004). The effect was moderate in magnitude (partial-η2=0.303), where males performed significantly better than females 6months after the PCI procedure physically and with mood. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs indicated that gender differences were grounded in the scale measuring depression (PHQ9) (p=0.005) and the physical component score of the short form measuring HRQoL (SF12-PCS) (p = 0.003). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up between time points 1 and 2. One patient was confirmed to have passed away. The pattern of correlations between outcome measures at time point 2 revealed statistically significant negative correlation between the PHQ instrument and the resilience scale (CD-RISC) (r=-0.611; p < 0.001); and the physical component score of the SF-12 instrument (r=-0.437; p = 0.054). Conclusions: Men were performing better than women in the 6 months post-PCI, particularly in the areas of mood (depression) and physical health. This pilot results indicate gender-sensitive practices are recommended particularly up to 6months post-PCI. Any gender differences observed at 6 month appear to disappear at 12months post-PCI. Further research into the management of mood particularly for women post-PCI is warranted. A more detailed inquiry related to access/attendance to secondary prevention is also warranted.",
keywords = "Depression, Gender, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Quality of life, Resilience, Wellbeing",
author = "Edward, {Karen Leigh} and John Stephenson and Giandinoto, {Jo Ann} and Andrew Wilson and Robert Whitbourn and Jack Gutman and Andrew Newcomb",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/s12872-016-0203-9",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Cardiovascular Disorders",
issn = "1471-2261",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

An Australian longitudinal pilot study examining health determinants of cardiac outcomes 12months post percutaneous coronary intervention. / Edward, Karen Leigh; Stephenson, John; Giandinoto, Jo Ann; Wilson, Andrew; Whitbourn, Robert; Gutman, Jack; Newcomb, Andrew.

In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 1, 31, 03.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Australian longitudinal pilot study examining health determinants of cardiac outcomes 12months post percutaneous coronary intervention

AU - Edward, Karen Leigh

AU - Stephenson, John

AU - Giandinoto, Jo Ann

AU - Wilson, Andrew

AU - Whitbourn, Robert

AU - Gutman, Jack

AU - Newcomb, Andrew

PY - 2016/2/3

Y1 - 2016/2/3

N2 - Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very common revascularisation procedure for coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac outcomes, health related quality of life (HRQoL), resilience and adherence behaviours in patients who have undergone a PCI at two time points (6 and 12months) following their procedure. Methods: A longitudinal pilot study was conducted to observe the cardiac outcomes across a cohort of patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants who had undergone PCI 6months prior were invited. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent then completed a telephone survey (time point 1). These participants were then contacted 6months later (i.e. 12 months post-intervention, time point 2) and the measures were repeated. Results: All patients (n=51) were recorded as being alive at time point 1. The multiple model indicated that controlling for other factors, gender was significantly associated with a linear combination of outcome measures (p=0.004). The effect was moderate in magnitude (partial-η2=0.303), where males performed significantly better than females 6months after the PCI procedure physically and with mood. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs indicated that gender differences were grounded in the scale measuring depression (PHQ9) (p=0.005) and the physical component score of the short form measuring HRQoL (SF12-PCS) (p = 0.003). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up between time points 1 and 2. One patient was confirmed to have passed away. The pattern of correlations between outcome measures at time point 2 revealed statistically significant negative correlation between the PHQ instrument and the resilience scale (CD-RISC) (r=-0.611; p < 0.001); and the physical component score of the SF-12 instrument (r=-0.437; p = 0.054). Conclusions: Men were performing better than women in the 6 months post-PCI, particularly in the areas of mood (depression) and physical health. This pilot results indicate gender-sensitive practices are recommended particularly up to 6months post-PCI. Any gender differences observed at 6 month appear to disappear at 12months post-PCI. Further research into the management of mood particularly for women post-PCI is warranted. A more detailed inquiry related to access/attendance to secondary prevention is also warranted.

AB - Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very common revascularisation procedure for coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac outcomes, health related quality of life (HRQoL), resilience and adherence behaviours in patients who have undergone a PCI at two time points (6 and 12months) following their procedure. Methods: A longitudinal pilot study was conducted to observe the cardiac outcomes across a cohort of patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants who had undergone PCI 6months prior were invited. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent then completed a telephone survey (time point 1). These participants were then contacted 6months later (i.e. 12 months post-intervention, time point 2) and the measures were repeated. Results: All patients (n=51) were recorded as being alive at time point 1. The multiple model indicated that controlling for other factors, gender was significantly associated with a linear combination of outcome measures (p=0.004). The effect was moderate in magnitude (partial-η2=0.303), where males performed significantly better than females 6months after the PCI procedure physically and with mood. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs indicated that gender differences were grounded in the scale measuring depression (PHQ9) (p=0.005) and the physical component score of the short form measuring HRQoL (SF12-PCS) (p = 0.003). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up between time points 1 and 2. One patient was confirmed to have passed away. The pattern of correlations between outcome measures at time point 2 revealed statistically significant negative correlation between the PHQ instrument and the resilience scale (CD-RISC) (r=-0.611; p < 0.001); and the physical component score of the SF-12 instrument (r=-0.437; p = 0.054). Conclusions: Men were performing better than women in the 6 months post-PCI, particularly in the areas of mood (depression) and physical health. This pilot results indicate gender-sensitive practices are recommended particularly up to 6months post-PCI. Any gender differences observed at 6 month appear to disappear at 12months post-PCI. Further research into the management of mood particularly for women post-PCI is warranted. A more detailed inquiry related to access/attendance to secondary prevention is also warranted.

KW - Depression

KW - Gender

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - Quality of life

KW - Resilience

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957440471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12872-016-0203-9

DO - 10.1186/s12872-016-0203-9

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

T2 - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

JF - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

SN - 1471-2261

IS - 1

M1 - 31

ER -