An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir

Gökcay Balci, Ismail Bilge Cetin, Soner Esmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Port competition and selection studies have mostly focused on container shipping, and the competition among dry bulk terminals has been ignored in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore terminal competition and selection criteria in the dry bulk market with a case study applied in Izmir, Turkey. A mixed methodology approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data is employed. The paper reveals seven main criteria for dry bulk terminal selection. One of them, the physical and technical capability of the terminal, is found to be a pre-condition that cannot be traded off. The importance weights of the other six selection criteria are ascertained using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Cargo handling costs are the most important criterion, while the other criteria in rank order are damage/loss performance, location, handling speed, responsiveness, and storage facilities. The results indicate that dry bulk shippers have different rankings of selection criteria, thus suggesting that shippers' expectations are heterogeneous. Although dry bulk terminal selection criteria are similar to those in container shipping, the content is quite different. Another interesting result is that shippers in the dry bulk market are concerned with some similar issues as carriers in container shipping when selecting a port.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-304
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Transport Geography
Volume69
Early online date16 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Freight transportation
Containers
evaluation
shipping
Cargo handling
Analytic hierarchy process
cargo handling
market
process analysis
ranking
Costs
Turkey
damages
damage
methodology
cost
costs
container
performance

Cite this

@article{f95974001c6f4de68dbaf8d097b55677,
title = "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir",
abstract = "Port competition and selection studies have mostly focused on container shipping, and the competition among dry bulk terminals has been ignored in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore terminal competition and selection criteria in the dry bulk market with a case study applied in Izmir, Turkey. A mixed methodology approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data is employed. The paper reveals seven main criteria for dry bulk terminal selection. One of them, the physical and technical capability of the terminal, is found to be a pre-condition that cannot be traded off. The importance weights of the other six selection criteria are ascertained using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Cargo handling costs are the most important criterion, while the other criteria in rank order are damage/loss performance, location, handling speed, responsiveness, and storage facilities. The results indicate that dry bulk shippers have different rankings of selection criteria, thus suggesting that shippers' expectations are heterogeneous. Although dry bulk terminal selection criteria are similar to those in container shipping, the content is quite different. Another interesting result is that shippers in the dry bulk market are concerned with some similar issues as carriers in container shipping when selecting a port.",
keywords = "Port competition, Terminal selection criteria, Dry bulk shipping, Dry bulk terminal, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process",
author = "G{\"o}kcay Balci and {Bilge Cetin}, Ismail and Soner Esmer",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.011",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "294--304",
journal = "Journal of Transport Geography",
issn = "0966-6923",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir. / Balci, Gökcay; Bilge Cetin, Ismail; Esmer, Soner.

In: Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 69, 05.2018, p. 294-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir

AU - Balci, Gökcay

AU - Bilge Cetin, Ismail

AU - Esmer, Soner

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Port competition and selection studies have mostly focused on container shipping, and the competition among dry bulk terminals has been ignored in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore terminal competition and selection criteria in the dry bulk market with a case study applied in Izmir, Turkey. A mixed methodology approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data is employed. The paper reveals seven main criteria for dry bulk terminal selection. One of them, the physical and technical capability of the terminal, is found to be a pre-condition that cannot be traded off. The importance weights of the other six selection criteria are ascertained using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Cargo handling costs are the most important criterion, while the other criteria in rank order are damage/loss performance, location, handling speed, responsiveness, and storage facilities. The results indicate that dry bulk shippers have different rankings of selection criteria, thus suggesting that shippers' expectations are heterogeneous. Although dry bulk terminal selection criteria are similar to those in container shipping, the content is quite different. Another interesting result is that shippers in the dry bulk market are concerned with some similar issues as carriers in container shipping when selecting a port.

AB - Port competition and selection studies have mostly focused on container shipping, and the competition among dry bulk terminals has been ignored in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore terminal competition and selection criteria in the dry bulk market with a case study applied in Izmir, Turkey. A mixed methodology approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data is employed. The paper reveals seven main criteria for dry bulk terminal selection. One of them, the physical and technical capability of the terminal, is found to be a pre-condition that cannot be traded off. The importance weights of the other six selection criteria are ascertained using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Cargo handling costs are the most important criterion, while the other criteria in rank order are damage/loss performance, location, handling speed, responsiveness, and storage facilities. The results indicate that dry bulk shippers have different rankings of selection criteria, thus suggesting that shippers' expectations are heterogeneous. Although dry bulk terminal selection criteria are similar to those in container shipping, the content is quite different. Another interesting result is that shippers in the dry bulk market are concerned with some similar issues as carriers in container shipping when selecting a port.

KW - Port competition

KW - Terminal selection criteria

KW - Dry bulk shipping

KW - Dry bulk terminal

KW - Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046881157&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=An+evaluation+of+competition+and+selection+criteria+between+dry+bulk+terminals+in+Izmir&st2=&sid=79c1232cf494b015546d28c8f81af874&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=102&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28An+evaluation+of+competition+and+selection+criteria+between+dry+bulk+terminals+in+Izmir%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.011

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 294

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Transport Geography

JF - Journal of Transport Geography

SN - 0966-6923

ER -