An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis

Theresa Munyombwe, Stefan Höfer, Donna Fitzsimons, David R. Thompson, Deidre Lane, Karen Smith, Felicity Astin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The symptom burden of heart failure is significant and impacts upon health-related quality of life. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is widely used in clinical practice to measure self-reported health-related quality of life, but the psychometric properties of the instrument are not fully elucidated. To address this gap, we investigated item and person fit, differential item functioning, item thresholds ordering, targeting and dimensionality of the MLHFQ. Methods: Three approaches were used, exploratory factor analysis, Mokken analysis and Rasch analysis, on a convenience sample of 109 participants with a diagnosis of HF from the UK. Participants were typically male (67 %) with a mean age of 68 years (range 41-88). Results: Findings from the exploratory factor analysis of the MLHFQ revealed three factors (physical, emotional and social) that explained 72 % of the total variance. Mokken analysis confirmed the MLHFQ total scale, and the three subscales, as valid ordinal scales: the total MLHFQ scale [overall Loevinger coefficient (H) = 0.61], physical scale (H = 0.75), emotional scale (H = 0.79) and social scale (H = 0.552). Rasch analysis confirmed the physical scale as a unidimensional scale, but this was not consistent for the total MLHFQ scale which showed poor fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 162), df = 42, p < 0.0001). Six items of the total scale were misfitting (7, 8, 10, 14-16) and removing them improved the fit of the total scale. The physical subscale showed fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 20.24, df = 16, p = 0.21), and there was evidence of unidimensionality (t tests = 0.09, lower bound 95 % CI 0.04). There was evidence of disordered thresholds for the MLHFQ total and physical scale, and targeting was poor for both the total scale and its subscales. Conclusion: We confirmed the MLHFQ subscales to be valid ordinal scales supporting the use of sum scores to assess quality of life in people diagnosed with HF. Floor effects were evident indicating that the ability of the instrument to identify differences across populations with mild HF may be suboptimal. The psychometric properties of the MLHFQ total scale may be improved by excluding problematic items from the total scale. Further research is warranted to verify findings from this study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1753-1765
Number of pages13
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date12 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Failure
Quality of Life
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Aptitude
Research
Population

Cite this

Munyombwe, Theresa ; Höfer, Stefan ; Fitzsimons, Donna ; Thompson, David R. ; Lane, Deidre ; Smith, Karen ; Astin, Felicity. / An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. In: Quality of Life Research. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 1753-1765.
@article{10eec64e383d440e9e848c3319568b9a,
title = "An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The symptom burden of heart failure is significant and impacts upon health-related quality of life. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is widely used in clinical practice to measure self-reported health-related quality of life, but the psychometric properties of the instrument are not fully elucidated. To address this gap, we investigated item and person fit, differential item functioning, item thresholds ordering, targeting and dimensionality of the MLHFQ. Methods: Three approaches were used, exploratory factor analysis, Mokken analysis and Rasch analysis, on a convenience sample of 109 participants with a diagnosis of HF from the UK. Participants were typically male (67 {\%}) with a mean age of 68 years (range 41-88). Results: Findings from the exploratory factor analysis of the MLHFQ revealed three factors (physical, emotional and social) that explained 72 {\%} of the total variance. Mokken analysis confirmed the MLHFQ total scale, and the three subscales, as valid ordinal scales: the total MLHFQ scale [overall Loevinger coefficient (H) = 0.61], physical scale (H = 0.75), emotional scale (H = 0.79) and social scale (H = 0.552). Rasch analysis confirmed the physical scale as a unidimensional scale, but this was not consistent for the total MLHFQ scale which showed poor fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 162), df = 42, p < 0.0001). Six items of the total scale were misfitting (7, 8, 10, 14-16) and removing them improved the fit of the total scale. The physical subscale showed fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 20.24, df = 16, p = 0.21), and there was evidence of unidimensionality (t tests = 0.09, lower bound 95 {\%} CI 0.04). There was evidence of disordered thresholds for the MLHFQ total and physical scale, and targeting was poor for both the total scale and its subscales. Conclusion: We confirmed the MLHFQ subscales to be valid ordinal scales supporting the use of sum scores to assess quality of life in people diagnosed with HF. Floor effects were evident indicating that the ability of the instrument to identify differences across populations with mild HF may be suboptimal. The psychometric properties of the MLHFQ total scale may be improved by excluding problematic items from the total scale. Further research is warranted to verify findings from this study.",
keywords = "Heart failure, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Mokken analysis, Quality of life, Rasch analysis",
author = "Theresa Munyombwe and Stefan H{\"o}fer and Donna Fitzsimons and Thompson, {David R.} and Deidre Lane and Karen Smith and Felicity Astin",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-013-0617-0",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1753--1765",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Munyombwe, T, Höfer, S, Fitzsimons, D, Thompson, DR, Lane, D, Smith, K & Astin, F 2014, 'An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis', Quality of Life Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1753-1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0617-0

An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. / Munyombwe, Theresa; Höfer, Stefan; Fitzsimons, Donna; Thompson, David R.; Lane, Deidre; Smith, Karen; Astin, Felicity.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 23, No. 6, 08.2014, p. 1753-1765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis

AU - Munyombwe, Theresa

AU - Höfer, Stefan

AU - Fitzsimons, Donna

AU - Thompson, David R.

AU - Lane, Deidre

AU - Smith, Karen

AU - Astin, Felicity

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Purpose: The symptom burden of heart failure is significant and impacts upon health-related quality of life. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is widely used in clinical practice to measure self-reported health-related quality of life, but the psychometric properties of the instrument are not fully elucidated. To address this gap, we investigated item and person fit, differential item functioning, item thresholds ordering, targeting and dimensionality of the MLHFQ. Methods: Three approaches were used, exploratory factor analysis, Mokken analysis and Rasch analysis, on a convenience sample of 109 participants with a diagnosis of HF from the UK. Participants were typically male (67 %) with a mean age of 68 years (range 41-88). Results: Findings from the exploratory factor analysis of the MLHFQ revealed three factors (physical, emotional and social) that explained 72 % of the total variance. Mokken analysis confirmed the MLHFQ total scale, and the three subscales, as valid ordinal scales: the total MLHFQ scale [overall Loevinger coefficient (H) = 0.61], physical scale (H = 0.75), emotional scale (H = 0.79) and social scale (H = 0.552). Rasch analysis confirmed the physical scale as a unidimensional scale, but this was not consistent for the total MLHFQ scale which showed poor fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 162), df = 42, p < 0.0001). Six items of the total scale were misfitting (7, 8, 10, 14-16) and removing them improved the fit of the total scale. The physical subscale showed fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 20.24, df = 16, p = 0.21), and there was evidence of unidimensionality (t tests = 0.09, lower bound 95 % CI 0.04). There was evidence of disordered thresholds for the MLHFQ total and physical scale, and targeting was poor for both the total scale and its subscales. Conclusion: We confirmed the MLHFQ subscales to be valid ordinal scales supporting the use of sum scores to assess quality of life in people diagnosed with HF. Floor effects were evident indicating that the ability of the instrument to identify differences across populations with mild HF may be suboptimal. The psychometric properties of the MLHFQ total scale may be improved by excluding problematic items from the total scale. Further research is warranted to verify findings from this study.

AB - Purpose: The symptom burden of heart failure is significant and impacts upon health-related quality of life. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is widely used in clinical practice to measure self-reported health-related quality of life, but the psychometric properties of the instrument are not fully elucidated. To address this gap, we investigated item and person fit, differential item functioning, item thresholds ordering, targeting and dimensionality of the MLHFQ. Methods: Three approaches were used, exploratory factor analysis, Mokken analysis and Rasch analysis, on a convenience sample of 109 participants with a diagnosis of HF from the UK. Participants were typically male (67 %) with a mean age of 68 years (range 41-88). Results: Findings from the exploratory factor analysis of the MLHFQ revealed three factors (physical, emotional and social) that explained 72 % of the total variance. Mokken analysis confirmed the MLHFQ total scale, and the three subscales, as valid ordinal scales: the total MLHFQ scale [overall Loevinger coefficient (H) = 0.61], physical scale (H = 0.75), emotional scale (H = 0.79) and social scale (H = 0.552). Rasch analysis confirmed the physical scale as a unidimensional scale, but this was not consistent for the total MLHFQ scale which showed poor fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 162), df = 42, p < 0.0001). Six items of the total scale were misfitting (7, 8, 10, 14-16) and removing them improved the fit of the total scale. The physical subscale showed fit to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 20.24, df = 16, p = 0.21), and there was evidence of unidimensionality (t tests = 0.09, lower bound 95 % CI 0.04). There was evidence of disordered thresholds for the MLHFQ total and physical scale, and targeting was poor for both the total scale and its subscales. Conclusion: We confirmed the MLHFQ subscales to be valid ordinal scales supporting the use of sum scores to assess quality of life in people diagnosed with HF. Floor effects were evident indicating that the ability of the instrument to identify differences across populations with mild HF may be suboptimal. The psychometric properties of the MLHFQ total scale may be improved by excluding problematic items from the total scale. Further research is warranted to verify findings from this study.

KW - Heart failure

KW - Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire

KW - Mokken analysis

KW - Quality of life

KW - Rasch analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905275752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-013-0617-0

DO - 10.1007/s11136-013-0617-0

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1753

EP - 1765

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 6

ER -