An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions

Rod Tucker, Mahendra Patel, Alison L. Layton, Shernaz Walton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic ability of pharmacists, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) for a range of skin conditions. METHODS: An online study comprising 10 specifically developed dermatological case studies containing a digital image of the skin condition and a short case history. A total of 60 participants (20 representing each of pharmacists, GPs and primary care nurses) were required to identify the skin condition as well as the features in the case history that supported the diagnosis and the recommended first-line management approach for the condition. KEY FINDINGS: The mean diagnostic scores for each group were GPs = 8.8 (95% confidence interval, CI, 7.9-9.6), pharmacists = 6.2 (95% CI, 5.4-6.9) and nurses = 7.0 (95% CI, 6.1-7.9). Post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in mean diagnostic scores was significant (P 
LanguageEnglish
Pages119-124
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
General Practitioners
Primary Health Care
Skin
Delivery of Health Care
Nurses
Nurse Practitioners
Confidence Intervals

Cite this

@article{fad1658a8b7c481ba2d7c1f44ebf5c92,
title = "An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic ability of pharmacists, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) for a range of skin conditions. METHODS: An online study comprising 10 specifically developed dermatological case studies containing a digital image of the skin condition and a short case history. A total of 60 participants (20 representing each of pharmacists, GPs and primary care nurses) were required to identify the skin condition as well as the features in the case history that supported the diagnosis and the recommended first-line management approach for the condition. KEY FINDINGS: The mean diagnostic scores for each group were GPs = 8.8 (95{\%} confidence interval, CI, 7.9-9.6), pharmacists = 6.2 (95{\%} CI, 5.4-6.9) and nurses = 7.0 (95{\%} CI, 6.1-7.9). Post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in mean diagnostic scores was significant (P ",
author = "Rod Tucker and Mahendra Patel and Layton, {Alison L.} and Shernaz Walton",
note = "This is the pre-peer-reviewed version of the following article:Tucker, R., Patel, M., Layton, A. and Walton, S. (2014) An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions International Journal of Pharmacy Practice , 22 (2), pp. 119-124. ISSN 0961-7671 , which has been published in final form http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12045",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijpp.12045",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "Pharmaceutical Press",
number = "2",

}

An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions. / Tucker, Rod; Patel, Mahendra; Layton, Alison L.; Walton, Shernaz.

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.04.2014, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions

AU - Tucker, Rod

AU - Patel, Mahendra

AU - Layton, Alison L.

AU - Walton, Shernaz

N1 - This is the pre-peer-reviewed version of the following article:Tucker, R., Patel, M., Layton, A. and Walton, S. (2014) An exploratory study demonstrating the diagnostic ability of healthcare professionals in primary care using online case studies for common skin conditions International Journal of Pharmacy Practice , 22 (2), pp. 119-124. ISSN 0961-7671 , which has been published in final form http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12045

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic ability of pharmacists, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) for a range of skin conditions. METHODS: An online study comprising 10 specifically developed dermatological case studies containing a digital image of the skin condition and a short case history. A total of 60 participants (20 representing each of pharmacists, GPs and primary care nurses) were required to identify the skin condition as well as the features in the case history that supported the diagnosis and the recommended first-line management approach for the condition. KEY FINDINGS: The mean diagnostic scores for each group were GPs = 8.8 (95% confidence interval, CI, 7.9-9.6), pharmacists = 6.2 (95% CI, 5.4-6.9) and nurses = 7.0 (95% CI, 6.1-7.9). Post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in mean diagnostic scores was significant (P 

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic ability of pharmacists, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) for a range of skin conditions. METHODS: An online study comprising 10 specifically developed dermatological case studies containing a digital image of the skin condition and a short case history. A total of 60 participants (20 representing each of pharmacists, GPs and primary care nurses) were required to identify the skin condition as well as the features in the case history that supported the diagnosis and the recommended first-line management approach for the condition. KEY FINDINGS: The mean diagnostic scores for each group were GPs = 8.8 (95% confidence interval, CI, 7.9-9.6), pharmacists = 6.2 (95% CI, 5.4-6.9) and nurses = 7.0 (95% CI, 6.1-7.9). Post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in mean diagnostic scores was significant (P 

U2 - 10.1111/ijpp.12045

DO - 10.1111/ijpp.12045

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

T2 - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 2

ER -