Abstract
Dynamic range compression (DRC) is a much-used process in music production. Traditionally the process was implemented in order to control the dynamic range of program material to minimize the potential of overloading recording devices. However, over time DRC became a process that was applied more as a creative effect and less as a preventative measure. In a professional recording environment it is not uncommon for engineers to have access to several different types of DRC unit, each with their own purportedly unique sonic signature. This paper investigates the differences between three popular vintage dynamic range compressors by conducting a number of measurements on the devices. The compressors were tested using: THD measurements, tone bursts and objective analysis of music-based material using spectrum analysis and audio feature extraction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 140th Audio Engineering Society International Convention 2016, AES 2016 |
Publisher | Audio Engineering Society |
Pages | 601-610 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781510825703 |
Publication status | Published - 26 May 2016 |
Event | 140th Audio Engineering Society International Convention - Paris, France Duration: 4 Jun 2016 → 7 Jun 2016 Conference number: 140 http://www.aes.org/events/140/ (Link to Conference Website) |
Conference
Conference | 140th Audio Engineering Society International Convention |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | AES 2016 |
Country/Territory | France |
City | Paris |
Period | 4/06/16 → 7/06/16 |
Internet address |
|
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An Investigation into the Sonic Signature of Three Classic Dynamic Range Compressors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Austin Moore
- Department of Media, Humanities and the Arts - Senior Lecturer
- School of Computing and Engineering
- Centre for Audio and Psychoacoustic Engineering - Member
- Centre for Research in Music and its Technologies - Member
Person: Academic