Abstract
The organization of daily procedures within the operating theatre is considered in terms of rival perspectives on their patient held by surgeon and anaesthetist. The privileging of the surgeon's authority is challenged in anaesthetists' efforts to fabricate a distinctive position on the patient. While surgeons focus on patient as the carrier of disease, for the anaesthetist, the focus is upon the patient's complement of fitness. A postmodern analysis of the organization of surgery reflects the continual struggle between the two specialisms to privilege its particular definition of the surgical patient. In some circumstances, the struggle can have damaging consequences for patient care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Sociology of Health & Illness |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1994 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anaesthetists, the discourse on patient fitness and the organisation of surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver