Analysis of criteria weights for the assessment of corporate sustainability

a case study in sugar manufacturing

Panitas Sureeyatanapas, Jian Bo Yang, David Bamford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The assessment of sustainability performance has become a topic widely discussed by business practitioners. The complexity of this issue is highlighted by the incorporation of a large number of criteria. Several methods under the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been employed to facilitate the aggregation of various criteria and to provide guidelines for decision making. As most MCDA methods assume that each criterion plays a role equal to its weight, this paper investigates the weight of each criterion in evaluation of corporate sustainability by focusing on the sugar industry in order to respond to the lack of MCDA and sustainability studies in this sector. The weighting is analysed by means of the relative importance based upon interviews and the direct rating technique. Statistical analysis is also conducted. The results from this empirical research indicate priorities of sustainability criteria and demonstrate the diversity of concerns within the industry when deciding on sustainability policies and strategies. This encourages practitioners to incorporate weights for uncertainty of sustainability criteria into decision making. Possible reasons for variations or changes in weights have been also discussed, and this enables practitioners to perform a sensitivity analysis in a more realistic way.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-145
Number of pages11
JournalKKU Engineering Journal
Volume43
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

sugar
manufacturing
sustainability
decision analysis
decision making
sensitivity analysis
analysis
statistical analysis
industry
method

Cite this

Sureeyatanapas, Panitas ; Yang, Jian Bo ; Bamford, David. / Analysis of criteria weights for the assessment of corporate sustainability : a case study in sugar manufacturing. In: KKU Engineering Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 135-145.
@article{1b0d9dd43465448ba307d8a12cafa004,
title = "Analysis of criteria weights for the assessment of corporate sustainability: a case study in sugar manufacturing",
abstract = "The assessment of sustainability performance has become a topic widely discussed by business practitioners. The complexity of this issue is highlighted by the incorporation of a large number of criteria. Several methods under the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been employed to facilitate the aggregation of various criteria and to provide guidelines for decision making. As most MCDA methods assume that each criterion plays a role equal to its weight, this paper investigates the weight of each criterion in evaluation of corporate sustainability by focusing on the sugar industry in order to respond to the lack of MCDA and sustainability studies in this sector. The weighting is analysed by means of the relative importance based upon interviews and the direct rating technique. Statistical analysis is also conducted. The results from this empirical research indicate priorities of sustainability criteria and demonstrate the diversity of concerns within the industry when deciding on sustainability policies and strategies. This encourages practitioners to incorporate weights for uncertainty of sustainability criteria into decision making. Possible reasons for variations or changes in weights have been also discussed, and this enables practitioners to perform a sensitivity analysis in a more realistic way.",
keywords = "corporate sustainability, decision making, multiple criteria analysis, relative weight, sustainability assessment",
author = "Panitas Sureeyatanapas and Yang, {Jian Bo} and David Bamford",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "25",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "135--145",
journal = "KKU Engineering Journal",
number = "3",

}

Analysis of criteria weights for the assessment of corporate sustainability : a case study in sugar manufacturing. / Sureeyatanapas, Panitas; Yang, Jian Bo; Bamford, David.

In: KKU Engineering Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 25.07.2016, p. 135-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of criteria weights for the assessment of corporate sustainability

T2 - a case study in sugar manufacturing

AU - Sureeyatanapas, Panitas

AU - Yang, Jian Bo

AU - Bamford, David

PY - 2016/7/25

Y1 - 2016/7/25

N2 - The assessment of sustainability performance has become a topic widely discussed by business practitioners. The complexity of this issue is highlighted by the incorporation of a large number of criteria. Several methods under the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been employed to facilitate the aggregation of various criteria and to provide guidelines for decision making. As most MCDA methods assume that each criterion plays a role equal to its weight, this paper investigates the weight of each criterion in evaluation of corporate sustainability by focusing on the sugar industry in order to respond to the lack of MCDA and sustainability studies in this sector. The weighting is analysed by means of the relative importance based upon interviews and the direct rating technique. Statistical analysis is also conducted. The results from this empirical research indicate priorities of sustainability criteria and demonstrate the diversity of concerns within the industry when deciding on sustainability policies and strategies. This encourages practitioners to incorporate weights for uncertainty of sustainability criteria into decision making. Possible reasons for variations or changes in weights have been also discussed, and this enables practitioners to perform a sensitivity analysis in a more realistic way.

AB - The assessment of sustainability performance has become a topic widely discussed by business practitioners. The complexity of this issue is highlighted by the incorporation of a large number of criteria. Several methods under the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been employed to facilitate the aggregation of various criteria and to provide guidelines for decision making. As most MCDA methods assume that each criterion plays a role equal to its weight, this paper investigates the weight of each criterion in evaluation of corporate sustainability by focusing on the sugar industry in order to respond to the lack of MCDA and sustainability studies in this sector. The weighting is analysed by means of the relative importance based upon interviews and the direct rating technique. Statistical analysis is also conducted. The results from this empirical research indicate priorities of sustainability criteria and demonstrate the diversity of concerns within the industry when deciding on sustainability policies and strategies. This encourages practitioners to incorporate weights for uncertainty of sustainability criteria into decision making. Possible reasons for variations or changes in weights have been also discussed, and this enables practitioners to perform a sensitivity analysis in a more realistic way.

KW - corporate sustainability

KW - decision making

KW - multiple criteria analysis

KW - relative weight

KW - sustainability assessment

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 135

EP - 145

JO - KKU Engineering Journal

JF - KKU Engineering Journal

IS - 3

ER -