Animal Farm: Considerations in Animal Gastrointestinal Physiology and Relevance to Drug Delivery in Humans

Grace B. Hatton, Vipul Yadav, Abdul W. Basit, Hamid Merchant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

“All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” was the illustrious quote derived from British writer George Orwell's famed work, Animal Farm. Extending beyond the remit of political allegory, however, this statement would appear to hold true for the selection of appropriate animal models to simulate human physiology in preclinical studies. There remain definite gaps in our current knowledge with respect to animal physiology, notably those of intra- and inter-species differences in gastrointestinal (GI) function, which may affect oral drug delivery and absorption. Factors such as cost and availability have often influenced the choice of animal species without clear justification for their similarity to humans, and lack of standardization in techniques employed in past studies using various animals may also have contributed to the generation of contradictory results. As it stands, attempts to identify a single animal species as appropriately representative of human physiology and which may able to adequately simulate human in vivo conditions are limited. In this review, we have compiled and critically reviewed data from numerous studies of GI anatomy and physiology of various animal species commonly used in drug delivery modeling, commenting on the appropriateness of these animals for in vivo comparison and extrapolation to humans.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2747-2776
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Volume104
Issue number9
Early online date24 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Domestic Animals
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Drug Design
Anatomy
Animal Models
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{8ae464d0f53648b5b9a77cd31a95cc88,
title = "Animal Farm: Considerations in Animal Gastrointestinal Physiology and Relevance to Drug Delivery in Humans",
abstract = "“All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” was the illustrious quote derived from British writer George Orwell's famed work, Animal Farm. Extending beyond the remit of political allegory, however, this statement would appear to hold true for the selection of appropriate animal models to simulate human physiology in preclinical studies. There remain definite gaps in our current knowledge with respect to animal physiology, notably those of intra- and inter-species differences in gastrointestinal (GI) function, which may affect oral drug delivery and absorption. Factors such as cost and availability have often influenced the choice of animal species without clear justification for their similarity to humans, and lack of standardization in techniques employed in past studies using various animals may also have contributed to the generation of contradictory results. As it stands, attempts to identify a single animal species as appropriately representative of human physiology and which may able to adequately simulate human in vivo conditions are limited. In this review, we have compiled and critically reviewed data from numerous studies of GI anatomy and physiology of various animal species commonly used in drug delivery modeling, commenting on the appropriateness of these animals for in vivo comparison and extrapolation to humans.",
keywords = "preclinical species , animal models in drug delivery , preclinical pharmacokinetics, in vitro/in vivo correlations, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, absorption, oral drug delivery, bioavailability",
author = "Hatton, {Grace B.} and Vipul Yadav and Basit, {Abdul W.} and Hamid Merchant",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1002/jps.24365",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "2747--2776",
journal = "Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences",
issn = "0022-3549",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Animal Farm : Considerations in Animal Gastrointestinal Physiology and Relevance to Drug Delivery in Humans. / Hatton, Grace B.; Yadav, Vipul; Basit, Abdul W.; Merchant, Hamid.

In: Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 104, No. 9, 24.09.2015, p. 2747-2776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animal Farm

T2 - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

AU - Hatton, Grace B.

AU - Yadav, Vipul

AU - Basit, Abdul W.

AU - Merchant, Hamid

PY - 2015/9/24

Y1 - 2015/9/24

N2 - “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” was the illustrious quote derived from British writer George Orwell's famed work, Animal Farm. Extending beyond the remit of political allegory, however, this statement would appear to hold true for the selection of appropriate animal models to simulate human physiology in preclinical studies. There remain definite gaps in our current knowledge with respect to animal physiology, notably those of intra- and inter-species differences in gastrointestinal (GI) function, which may affect oral drug delivery and absorption. Factors such as cost and availability have often influenced the choice of animal species without clear justification for their similarity to humans, and lack of standardization in techniques employed in past studies using various animals may also have contributed to the generation of contradictory results. As it stands, attempts to identify a single animal species as appropriately representative of human physiology and which may able to adequately simulate human in vivo conditions are limited. In this review, we have compiled and critically reviewed data from numerous studies of GI anatomy and physiology of various animal species commonly used in drug delivery modeling, commenting on the appropriateness of these animals for in vivo comparison and extrapolation to humans.

AB - “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” was the illustrious quote derived from British writer George Orwell's famed work, Animal Farm. Extending beyond the remit of political allegory, however, this statement would appear to hold true for the selection of appropriate animal models to simulate human physiology in preclinical studies. There remain definite gaps in our current knowledge with respect to animal physiology, notably those of intra- and inter-species differences in gastrointestinal (GI) function, which may affect oral drug delivery and absorption. Factors such as cost and availability have often influenced the choice of animal species without clear justification for their similarity to humans, and lack of standardization in techniques employed in past studies using various animals may also have contributed to the generation of contradictory results. As it stands, attempts to identify a single animal species as appropriately representative of human physiology and which may able to adequately simulate human in vivo conditions are limited. In this review, we have compiled and critically reviewed data from numerous studies of GI anatomy and physiology of various animal species commonly used in drug delivery modeling, commenting on the appropriateness of these animals for in vivo comparison and extrapolation to humans.

KW - preclinical species

KW - animal models in drug delivery

KW - preclinical pharmacokinetics

KW - in vitro/in vivo correlations

KW - pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models

KW - absorption

KW - oral drug delivery

KW - bioavailability

U2 - 10.1002/jps.24365

DO - 10.1002/jps.24365

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 2747

EP - 2776

JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

SN - 0022-3549

IS - 9

ER -