Apples and oranges: The aggregation problem in publications analysis

Geraint Johnes, Jill Johnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A major difficulty with bibliometric measures of departmental research contributions based upon publications counts has concerned the summing of publications of different types. An attempt is made in this paper to bypass this aggregation problem by appeal to the methods of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this way we investigate the technical efficiency of UK university departments of economics as producers of research. The data set used is an extended version of the one which informed the recent Universities Funding Council peer review, and the results obtained here are compared with those obtained by the Council. We conclude that, although due caution is needed in the interpretation of results, DEA has a positive contribution to make in the development of meaningful indicators of university performance.

LanguageEnglish
Pages353-365
Number of pages13
JournalScientometrics
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Data envelopment analysis
aggregation
data analysis
Agglomeration
peer review
appeal
producer
funding
efficiency
Economics
interpretation
university
performance
economics

Cite this

@article{dcb52f4674ec4e3a8dc93d2f22d62e90,
title = "Apples and oranges: The aggregation problem in publications analysis",
abstract = "A major difficulty with bibliometric measures of departmental research contributions based upon publications counts has concerned the summing of publications of different types. An attempt is made in this paper to bypass this aggregation problem by appeal to the methods of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this way we investigate the technical efficiency of UK university departments of economics as producers of research. The data set used is an extended version of the one which informed the recent Universities Funding Council peer review, and the results obtained here are compared with those obtained by the Council. We conclude that, although due caution is needed in the interpretation of results, DEA has a positive contribution to make in the development of meaningful indicators of university performance.",
keywords = "Data envelopment analysis, Technical efficiency, summing, positive contribution, major difficulty",
author = "Geraint Johnes and Jill Johnes",
year = "1992",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02028091",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "353--365",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Apples and oranges : The aggregation problem in publications analysis. / Johnes, Geraint; Johnes, Jill.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.10.1992, p. 353-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Apples and oranges

T2 - Scientometrics

AU - Johnes, Geraint

AU - Johnes, Jill

PY - 1992/10/1

Y1 - 1992/10/1

N2 - A major difficulty with bibliometric measures of departmental research contributions based upon publications counts has concerned the summing of publications of different types. An attempt is made in this paper to bypass this aggregation problem by appeal to the methods of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this way we investigate the technical efficiency of UK university departments of economics as producers of research. The data set used is an extended version of the one which informed the recent Universities Funding Council peer review, and the results obtained here are compared with those obtained by the Council. We conclude that, although due caution is needed in the interpretation of results, DEA has a positive contribution to make in the development of meaningful indicators of university performance.

AB - A major difficulty with bibliometric measures of departmental research contributions based upon publications counts has concerned the summing of publications of different types. An attempt is made in this paper to bypass this aggregation problem by appeal to the methods of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this way we investigate the technical efficiency of UK university departments of economics as producers of research. The data set used is an extended version of the one which informed the recent Universities Funding Council peer review, and the results obtained here are compared with those obtained by the Council. We conclude that, although due caution is needed in the interpretation of results, DEA has a positive contribution to make in the development of meaningful indicators of university performance.

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - Technical efficiency

KW - summing

KW - positive contribution

KW - major difficulty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040598733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02028091

DO - 10.1007/BF02028091

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 353

EP - 365

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -