Are business school deans doomed?: The global financial crisis, Brexit and all that

Julie Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to focus on different types of university-based business school dean (BSD) in a context of insecurities within the business school business and more widely with changing business and educational models and disruptions such as the global financial crisis and Brexit. The position of the BSD is contextualised within the industry sector, institutionally, and in relation to individuals’ tenures to make sense of how BSDs are operating on a burning platform. A well-established middle management strategic role framework is applied to the empirical data.

Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 50 one-to-one interviews were conducted with deans and their colleagues. Deans’ behaviours were analysed according to attention paid to “facilitating”, “synthesizing”, “championing”, and “implementing” strategic activities.

Findings
– Behaviours from primary professional identities as scholars and educators were identified as prevalent. It is suggested that to achieve greater legitimacy in declining mature markets, future deans will need to re-negotiate their roles to champion as public intellectuals the societal impact of business schools more widely in a context of shifting business and educational models.

Practical implications
– The study is relevant to current and aspiring deans and for those hiring and developing business school deans.

Originality/value
– The dean is conceptualised as a hybrid upper middle manager besieged by multiple stakeholders and challenges. Novel first-order insights into a typology of strategists are highlighted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages901-915
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Management Development
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Business schools
Global financial crisis
Education
Design methodology
Hiring
Legitimacy
Middle managers
Empirical data
Multiple stakeholders
Professional identity
Disruption
Middle management
Industry
Tenure

Cite this

@article{786cc55c8d2249f6ac5f60fc670c4648,
title = "Are business school deans doomed?: The global financial crisis, Brexit and all that",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to focus on different types of university-based business school dean (BSD) in a context of insecurities within the business school business and more widely with changing business and educational models and disruptions such as the global financial crisis and Brexit. The position of the BSD is contextualised within the industry sector, institutionally, and in relation to individuals’ tenures to make sense of how BSDs are operating on a burning platform. A well-established middle management strategic role framework is applied to the empirical data.Design/methodology/approach– In total, 50 one-to-one interviews were conducted with deans and their colleagues. Deans’ behaviours were analysed according to attention paid to “facilitating”, “synthesizing”, “championing”, and “implementing” strategic activities.Findings– Behaviours from primary professional identities as scholars and educators were identified as prevalent. It is suggested that to achieve greater legitimacy in declining mature markets, future deans will need to re-negotiate their roles to champion as public intellectuals the societal impact of business schools more widely in a context of shifting business and educational models.Practical implications– The study is relevant to current and aspiring deans and for those hiring and developing business school deans.Originality/value– The dean is conceptualised as a hybrid upper middle manager besieged by multiple stakeholders and challenges. Novel first-order insights into a typology of strategists are highlighted.",
keywords = "Roles, Typology, Business Schools, Deans, Middle Managers, Hybrids",
author = "Julie Davies",
note = "Not deposited within 3 months of acceptance. Deposited within 3 months of publication. HN 10/12/2017",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0114",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "901--915",
journal = "Journal of Management Development",
issn = "0262-1711",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Are business school deans doomed? The global financial crisis, Brexit and all that. / Davies, Julie.

In: Journal of Management Development, Vol. 35, No. 7, 08.08.2016, p. 901-915.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are business school deans doomed?

T2 - Journal of Management Development

AU - Davies, Julie

N1 - Not deposited within 3 months of acceptance. Deposited within 3 months of publication. HN 10/12/2017

PY - 2016/8/8

Y1 - 2016/8/8

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to focus on different types of university-based business school dean (BSD) in a context of insecurities within the business school business and more widely with changing business and educational models and disruptions such as the global financial crisis and Brexit. The position of the BSD is contextualised within the industry sector, institutionally, and in relation to individuals’ tenures to make sense of how BSDs are operating on a burning platform. A well-established middle management strategic role framework is applied to the empirical data.Design/methodology/approach– In total, 50 one-to-one interviews were conducted with deans and their colleagues. Deans’ behaviours were analysed according to attention paid to “facilitating”, “synthesizing”, “championing”, and “implementing” strategic activities.Findings– Behaviours from primary professional identities as scholars and educators were identified as prevalent. It is suggested that to achieve greater legitimacy in declining mature markets, future deans will need to re-negotiate their roles to champion as public intellectuals the societal impact of business schools more widely in a context of shifting business and educational models.Practical implications– The study is relevant to current and aspiring deans and for those hiring and developing business school deans.Originality/value– The dean is conceptualised as a hybrid upper middle manager besieged by multiple stakeholders and challenges. Novel first-order insights into a typology of strategists are highlighted.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to focus on different types of university-based business school dean (BSD) in a context of insecurities within the business school business and more widely with changing business and educational models and disruptions such as the global financial crisis and Brexit. The position of the BSD is contextualised within the industry sector, institutionally, and in relation to individuals’ tenures to make sense of how BSDs are operating on a burning platform. A well-established middle management strategic role framework is applied to the empirical data.Design/methodology/approach– In total, 50 one-to-one interviews were conducted with deans and their colleagues. Deans’ behaviours were analysed according to attention paid to “facilitating”, “synthesizing”, “championing”, and “implementing” strategic activities.Findings– Behaviours from primary professional identities as scholars and educators were identified as prevalent. It is suggested that to achieve greater legitimacy in declining mature markets, future deans will need to re-negotiate their roles to champion as public intellectuals the societal impact of business schools more widely in a context of shifting business and educational models.Practical implications– The study is relevant to current and aspiring deans and for those hiring and developing business school deans.Originality/value– The dean is conceptualised as a hybrid upper middle manager besieged by multiple stakeholders and challenges. Novel first-order insights into a typology of strategists are highlighted.

KW - Roles

KW - Typology

KW - Business Schools

KW - Deans

KW - Middle Managers

KW - Hybrids

U2 - 10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0114

DO - 10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0114

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 901

EP - 915

JO - Journal of Management Development

JF - Journal of Management Development

SN - 0262-1711

IS - 7

ER -