Are Men Getting More Emotional? Critical Sociological Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Emotions

Sam de Boise, Jeffery Hearn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sociological research, influenced by feminist and other critical perspectives, has noted how men’s emotional inexpressiveness was influenced, and supported, by patriarchal privilege. Such approaches have argued that ‘inexpression’ needs to be broken down in order to build gender equality and improve men’s own wellbeing. Emerging research has, however, challenged the argument that men are ‘emotionally inexpressive’ on two main premises: that, as a result of feminist critiques, many men now practise ‘softer’ or ‘more emotional’ forms of masculinity; second, that emotions always influence social action and so need to be better incorporated into sociological accounts of men’s behaviour. Yet these approaches entail some conceptual confusion as to what emotions are, how they link to social action and whether men’s emotions are inherently transformative for gender relations. This article first details how emotions and masculinity have been theorized in feminist-inspired approaches. It outlines recent work on emotions, men and masculinities before arguing for an understanding of emotions that engages with both physiologically grounded and postconstructionist debates. It finally suggests incorporating a material-discursive approach to men’s emotions, through feminist work on affect, which is attentive to the political dimensions of ‘increasing emotionality’ in order to contribute to a developing field of sociological research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-796
Number of pages18
JournalSociological Review
Volume65
Issue number4
Early online date25 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

masculinity
emotion
social research
emotionality
gender relations
privilege
equality
gender

Cite this

@article{14eedeb9e40d4ee2aa5bc49a2e88aeaa,
title = "Are Men Getting More Emotional? Critical Sociological Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Emotions",
abstract = "Sociological research, influenced by feminist and other critical perspectives, has noted how men’s emotional inexpressiveness was influenced, and supported, by patriarchal privilege. Such approaches have argued that ‘inexpression’ needs to be broken down in order to build gender equality and improve men’s own wellbeing. Emerging research has, however, challenged the argument that men are ‘emotionally inexpressive’ on two main premises: that, as a result of feminist critiques, many men now practise ‘softer’ or ‘more emotional’ forms of masculinity; second, that emotions always influence social action and so need to be better incorporated into sociological accounts of men’s behaviour. Yet these approaches entail some conceptual confusion as to what emotions are, how they link to social action and whether men’s emotions are inherently transformative for gender relations. This article first details how emotions and masculinity have been theorized in feminist-inspired approaches. It outlines recent work on emotions, men and masculinities before arguing for an understanding of emotions that engages with both physiologically grounded and postconstructionist debates. It finally suggests incorporating a material-discursive approach to men’s emotions, through feminist work on affect, which is attentive to the political dimensions of ‘increasing emotionality’ in order to contribute to a developing field of sociological research.",
keywords = "Affect, Critical studies on men and masculinities (CSMM), Emotion, Masculinities, Masculinity, Men",
author = "{de Boise}, Sam and Jeffery Hearn",
note = "Not OA compliant; AAM deposited in ePrints 8 months after acceptance/publication.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038026116686500",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "779--796",
journal = "Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Are Men Getting More Emotional? Critical Sociological Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Emotions. / de Boise, Sam; Hearn, Jeffery.

In: Sociological Review, Vol. 65, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 779-796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Men Getting More Emotional? Critical Sociological Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Emotions

AU - de Boise, Sam

AU - Hearn, Jeffery

N1 - Not OA compliant; AAM deposited in ePrints 8 months after acceptance/publication.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Sociological research, influenced by feminist and other critical perspectives, has noted how men’s emotional inexpressiveness was influenced, and supported, by patriarchal privilege. Such approaches have argued that ‘inexpression’ needs to be broken down in order to build gender equality and improve men’s own wellbeing. Emerging research has, however, challenged the argument that men are ‘emotionally inexpressive’ on two main premises: that, as a result of feminist critiques, many men now practise ‘softer’ or ‘more emotional’ forms of masculinity; second, that emotions always influence social action and so need to be better incorporated into sociological accounts of men’s behaviour. Yet these approaches entail some conceptual confusion as to what emotions are, how they link to social action and whether men’s emotions are inherently transformative for gender relations. This article first details how emotions and masculinity have been theorized in feminist-inspired approaches. It outlines recent work on emotions, men and masculinities before arguing for an understanding of emotions that engages with both physiologically grounded and postconstructionist debates. It finally suggests incorporating a material-discursive approach to men’s emotions, through feminist work on affect, which is attentive to the political dimensions of ‘increasing emotionality’ in order to contribute to a developing field of sociological research.

AB - Sociological research, influenced by feminist and other critical perspectives, has noted how men’s emotional inexpressiveness was influenced, and supported, by patriarchal privilege. Such approaches have argued that ‘inexpression’ needs to be broken down in order to build gender equality and improve men’s own wellbeing. Emerging research has, however, challenged the argument that men are ‘emotionally inexpressive’ on two main premises: that, as a result of feminist critiques, many men now practise ‘softer’ or ‘more emotional’ forms of masculinity; second, that emotions always influence social action and so need to be better incorporated into sociological accounts of men’s behaviour. Yet these approaches entail some conceptual confusion as to what emotions are, how they link to social action and whether men’s emotions are inherently transformative for gender relations. This article first details how emotions and masculinity have been theorized in feminist-inspired approaches. It outlines recent work on emotions, men and masculinities before arguing for an understanding of emotions that engages with both physiologically grounded and postconstructionist debates. It finally suggests incorporating a material-discursive approach to men’s emotions, through feminist work on affect, which is attentive to the political dimensions of ‘increasing emotionality’ in order to contribute to a developing field of sociological research.

KW - Affect

KW - Critical studies on men and masculinities (CSMM)

KW - Emotion

KW - Masculinities

KW - Masculinity

KW - Men

UR - https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sociological-review/journal202588#description

U2 - 10.1177/0038026116686500

DO - 10.1177/0038026116686500

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 779

EP - 796

JO - Sociological Review

JF - Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 4

ER -