Are social media platforms blurring the lines between coercive control and healthy relationship? A study investigating perceptions of coercive control

Holly Scothorne, Calli Tzani, Maria Ioannou, David Lester, Lucas Rogers, Thomas James Vaughan Williams, John Synnott, Greta Darmanin Kissaun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.
Original languageEnglish
Article number108649
Number of pages8
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume168
Early online date26 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Mar 2025

Cite this