Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy

Lewis Newton, Nicola Senin, Carlos Gomez, Reinhard Danzl, Franz Helmli, Liam Blunt, Richard Leach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this work, the performance of a focus variation instrument for measurement of areal topography of metal additive surfaces was investigated. Samples were produced using both laser and electron beam powder bed fusion processes with some of the most common additive materials: Al-Si-10Mg, Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V. Surfaces parallel and orthogonal to the build direction were investigated. Measurement performance was qualified by visually inspecting the topographic models obtained from measurement and quantified by computing the number of non-measured data points, by estimating local repeatability error in topography height determination and by computing the value of the areal field texture parameter Sa. Variations captured through such indicators were investigated as focus variation-specific measurement control parameters were varied. Changes in magnification, illumination type, vertical resolution and lateral resolution were investigated. The experimental campaign was created through full factorial design of experiments, and regression models were used to link the selected measurement process control parameters to the measured performance indicators. The results indicate that focus variation microscopy measurement of metal additive surfaces is robust to changes of the measurement control parameters when the Sa texture parameter is considered, with variations confined to sub-micrometre scales and within 5% of the average parameter value for the same surface and objective. The number of non-measured points and the local repeatability error were more affected by the choice of measurement control parameters. However, such changes could be predicted by the regression models, and proved consistent once material, type of additive process and orientation of the measured surface are set.

LanguageEnglish
Pages365-389
Number of pages25
JournalAdditive Manufacturing
Volume25
Early online date15 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Topography
Microscopic examination
Metals
Textures
Powders
Design of experiments
Process control
Laser beams
Electron beams
Fusion reactions
Lighting

Cite this

Newton, Lewis ; Senin, Nicola ; Gomez, Carlos ; Danzl, Reinhard ; Helmli, Franz ; Blunt, Liam ; Leach, Richard. / Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy. In: Additive Manufacturing. 2019 ; Vol. 25. pp. 365-389.
@article{d1a611fb36744b11bd9d1e7e47d8d00b,
title = "Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy",
abstract = "In this work, the performance of a focus variation instrument for measurement of areal topography of metal additive surfaces was investigated. Samples were produced using both laser and electron beam powder bed fusion processes with some of the most common additive materials: Al-Si-10Mg, Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V. Surfaces parallel and orthogonal to the build direction were investigated. Measurement performance was qualified by visually inspecting the topographic models obtained from measurement and quantified by computing the number of non-measured data points, by estimating local repeatability error in topography height determination and by computing the value of the areal field texture parameter Sa. Variations captured through such indicators were investigated as focus variation-specific measurement control parameters were varied. Changes in magnification, illumination type, vertical resolution and lateral resolution were investigated. The experimental campaign was created through full factorial design of experiments, and regression models were used to link the selected measurement process control parameters to the measured performance indicators. The results indicate that focus variation microscopy measurement of metal additive surfaces is robust to changes of the measurement control parameters when the Sa texture parameter is considered, with variations confined to sub-micrometre scales and within 5{\%} of the average parameter value for the same surface and objective. The number of non-measured points and the local repeatability error were more affected by the choice of measurement control parameters. However, such changes could be predicted by the regression models, and proved consistent once material, type of additive process and orientation of the measured surface are set.",
keywords = "Additive manufacturing, Electron beam powder bed fusion, Focus variation microscopy, Laser powder bed fusion, Surface metrology",
author = "Lewis Newton and Nicola Senin and Carlos Gomez and Reinhard Danzl and Franz Helmli and Liam Blunt and Richard Leach",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "365--389",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy. / Newton, Lewis; Senin, Nicola; Gomez, Carlos; Danzl, Reinhard; Helmli, Franz; Blunt, Liam; Leach, Richard.

In: Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, 01.2019, p. 365-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy

AU - Newton, Lewis

AU - Senin, Nicola

AU - Gomez, Carlos

AU - Danzl, Reinhard

AU - Helmli, Franz

AU - Blunt, Liam

AU - Leach, Richard

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - In this work, the performance of a focus variation instrument for measurement of areal topography of metal additive surfaces was investigated. Samples were produced using both laser and electron beam powder bed fusion processes with some of the most common additive materials: Al-Si-10Mg, Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V. Surfaces parallel and orthogonal to the build direction were investigated. Measurement performance was qualified by visually inspecting the topographic models obtained from measurement and quantified by computing the number of non-measured data points, by estimating local repeatability error in topography height determination and by computing the value of the areal field texture parameter Sa. Variations captured through such indicators were investigated as focus variation-specific measurement control parameters were varied. Changes in magnification, illumination type, vertical resolution and lateral resolution were investigated. The experimental campaign was created through full factorial design of experiments, and regression models were used to link the selected measurement process control parameters to the measured performance indicators. The results indicate that focus variation microscopy measurement of metal additive surfaces is robust to changes of the measurement control parameters when the Sa texture parameter is considered, with variations confined to sub-micrometre scales and within 5% of the average parameter value for the same surface and objective. The number of non-measured points and the local repeatability error were more affected by the choice of measurement control parameters. However, such changes could be predicted by the regression models, and proved consistent once material, type of additive process and orientation of the measured surface are set.

AB - In this work, the performance of a focus variation instrument for measurement of areal topography of metal additive surfaces was investigated. Samples were produced using both laser and electron beam powder bed fusion processes with some of the most common additive materials: Al-Si-10Mg, Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V. Surfaces parallel and orthogonal to the build direction were investigated. Measurement performance was qualified by visually inspecting the topographic models obtained from measurement and quantified by computing the number of non-measured data points, by estimating local repeatability error in topography height determination and by computing the value of the areal field texture parameter Sa. Variations captured through such indicators were investigated as focus variation-specific measurement control parameters were varied. Changes in magnification, illumination type, vertical resolution and lateral resolution were investigated. The experimental campaign was created through full factorial design of experiments, and regression models were used to link the selected measurement process control parameters to the measured performance indicators. The results indicate that focus variation microscopy measurement of metal additive surfaces is robust to changes of the measurement control parameters when the Sa texture parameter is considered, with variations confined to sub-micrometre scales and within 5% of the average parameter value for the same surface and objective. The number of non-measured points and the local repeatability error were more affected by the choice of measurement control parameters. However, such changes could be predicted by the regression models, and proved consistent once material, type of additive process and orientation of the measured surface are set.

KW - Additive manufacturing

KW - Electron beam powder bed fusion

KW - Focus variation microscopy

KW - Laser powder bed fusion

KW - Surface metrology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057192946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 365

EP - 389

JO - Additive Manufacturing

T2 - Additive Manufacturing

JF - Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2214-8604

ER -