TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Mental Health of Fathers, Other Co-Parents and Partners in the Perinatal Period
T2 - Mixed Methods Evidence Synthesis
AU - Darwin, Zoe
AU - Domoney, Jill
AU - Iles, Jane
AU - Bristow, Florence
AU - Siew, Jasmine
AU - Sethna, Vaheshta
N1 - Funding Information:
A portion of the research was undertaken when the lead reviewer (ZD) was at the University of Leeds (UK), including the searches of electronic databases, which were undertaken by the University's information specialists. A summary of the messages concerning gaps in the literature appears in the good practice guide (17 ); the detailed results and synthesis have not been presented elsewhere. Funding. The evidence synthesis was undertaken as part of a series of reviews to inform the production of a good practice guide (17 ). The development of the good practice guide received funding from NHS England and Improvement.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Darwin, Domoney, Iles, Bristow, Siew and Sethna.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/12
Y1 - 2021/1/12
N2 - Introduction: Five to 10 percentage of fathers experience perinatal depression and 5–15% experience perinatal anxiety, with rates increasing when mothers are also experiencing perinatal mental health disorders. Perinatal mental illness in either parent contributes to adverse child and family outcomes. While there are increasing calls to assess the mental health of both parents, universal services (e.g., maternity) and specialist perinatal mental health services usually focus on the mother (i.e., the gestational parent). The aim of this review was to identify and synthesize evidence on the performance of mental health screening tools and the acceptability of mental health assessment, specifically in relation to fathers, other co-parents and partners in the perinatal period. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Maternity, and Infant Care Database and CINAHL). Articles were eligible if they included expectant or new partners, regardless of the partner's gender or relationship status. Accuracy was determined by comparison of screening tool with diagnostic interview. Acceptability was predominantly assessed through parents' and health professionals' perspectives. Narrative synthesis was applied to all elements of the review, with thematic analysis applied to the acceptability studies. Results: Seven accuracy studies and 20 acceptability studies were included. The review identified that existing evidence focuses on resident fathers and assessing depression in universal settings. All accuracy studies assessed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale but with highly varied results. Evidence on acceptability in practice is limited to postnatal settings. Amongst both fathers and health professionals, views on assessment are mixed. Identified challenges were categorized at the individual-, practitioner- and service-level. These include: gendered perspectives on mental health; the potential to compromise support offered to mothers; practitioners' knowledge, skills, and confidence; service culture and remit; time pressures; opportunity for contact; and the need for tools, training, supervision and onward referral routes. Conclusion: There is a paucity of published evidence on assessing the mental health of fathers, co-mothers, step-parents and other partners in the perinatal period. Whilst practitioners need to be responsive to mental health needs, further research is needed with stakeholders in a range of practice settings, with attention to ethical and practical considerations, to inform the implementation of evidence-based assessment.
AB - Introduction: Five to 10 percentage of fathers experience perinatal depression and 5–15% experience perinatal anxiety, with rates increasing when mothers are also experiencing perinatal mental health disorders. Perinatal mental illness in either parent contributes to adverse child and family outcomes. While there are increasing calls to assess the mental health of both parents, universal services (e.g., maternity) and specialist perinatal mental health services usually focus on the mother (i.e., the gestational parent). The aim of this review was to identify and synthesize evidence on the performance of mental health screening tools and the acceptability of mental health assessment, specifically in relation to fathers, other co-parents and partners in the perinatal period. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Maternity, and Infant Care Database and CINAHL). Articles were eligible if they included expectant or new partners, regardless of the partner's gender or relationship status. Accuracy was determined by comparison of screening tool with diagnostic interview. Acceptability was predominantly assessed through parents' and health professionals' perspectives. Narrative synthesis was applied to all elements of the review, with thematic analysis applied to the acceptability studies. Results: Seven accuracy studies and 20 acceptability studies were included. The review identified that existing evidence focuses on resident fathers and assessing depression in universal settings. All accuracy studies assessed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale but with highly varied results. Evidence on acceptability in practice is limited to postnatal settings. Amongst both fathers and health professionals, views on assessment are mixed. Identified challenges were categorized at the individual-, practitioner- and service-level. These include: gendered perspectives on mental health; the potential to compromise support offered to mothers; practitioners' knowledge, skills, and confidence; service culture and remit; time pressures; opportunity for contact; and the need for tools, training, supervision and onward referral routes. Conclusion: There is a paucity of published evidence on assessing the mental health of fathers, co-mothers, step-parents and other partners in the perinatal period. Whilst practitioners need to be responsive to mental health needs, further research is needed with stakeholders in a range of practice settings, with attention to ethical and practical considerations, to inform the implementation of evidence-based assessment.
KW - Acceptability
KW - Diagnostic test accuracy
KW - Evidence synthesis
KW - Fathers
KW - Partners
KW - Paternal depression
KW - Perinatal mental health
KW - Screening
KW - fathers
KW - screening
KW - evidence synthesis
KW - acceptability
KW - partners
KW - diagnostic test accuracy
KW - paternal depression
KW - perinatal mental health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099970379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585479
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585479
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33510656
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
SN - 1664-0640
M1 - 585479
ER -