Assessing the returns to collaborative research

Firm-level evidence from Italy

Giuseppe Medda, Claudio Piga, Donald S. Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use firm-level data from Italian manufacturing firms to assess the relationship between various types of R&D and total factor productivity growth, including collaborative research with other firms and universities. A novel twist to our empirical analysis is that we estimate a sample selection model, which allows us to treat the decision to conduct R&D as endogenous. We find strong evidence of positive returns to collaborative research with other companies, whereas collaborative research with universities does not appear to enhance productivity. This result implies that firms may conduct R&D with universities when appropriability conditions are weak and the outcomes of such research projects do not yield direct strategic benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-50
Number of pages14
JournalEconomics of Innovation and New Technology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Productivity
Italy
Collaborative research
Industry
Firm-level data
Empirical analysis
Sample selection model
Total factor productivity growth
Manufacturing firms
Appropriability
Twist

Cite this

@article{9db0c3d23f2043be8622deb0c3b0dc9f,
title = "Assessing the returns to collaborative research: Firm-level evidence from Italy",
abstract = "We use firm-level data from Italian manufacturing firms to assess the relationship between various types of R&D and total factor productivity growth, including collaborative research with other firms and universities. A novel twist to our empirical analysis is that we estimate a sample selection model, which allows us to treat the decision to conduct R&D as endogenous. We find strong evidence of positive returns to collaborative research with other companies, whereas collaborative research with universities does not appear to enhance productivity. This result implies that firms may conduct R&D with universities when appropriability conditions are weak and the outcomes of such research projects do not yield direct strategic benefits.",
keywords = "Collaborative research, R&d, Sample selection bias, Total factor productivity",
author = "Giuseppe Medda and Claudio Piga and Siegel, {Donald S.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/1043859042000332213",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "37--50",
journal = "Economics of Innovation and New Technology",
issn = "1043-8599",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Assessing the returns to collaborative research : Firm-level evidence from Italy. / Medda, Giuseppe; Piga, Claudio; Siegel, Donald S.

In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2006, p. 37-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the returns to collaborative research

T2 - Firm-level evidence from Italy

AU - Medda, Giuseppe

AU - Piga, Claudio

AU - Siegel, Donald S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - We use firm-level data from Italian manufacturing firms to assess the relationship between various types of R&D and total factor productivity growth, including collaborative research with other firms and universities. A novel twist to our empirical analysis is that we estimate a sample selection model, which allows us to treat the decision to conduct R&D as endogenous. We find strong evidence of positive returns to collaborative research with other companies, whereas collaborative research with universities does not appear to enhance productivity. This result implies that firms may conduct R&D with universities when appropriability conditions are weak and the outcomes of such research projects do not yield direct strategic benefits.

AB - We use firm-level data from Italian manufacturing firms to assess the relationship between various types of R&D and total factor productivity growth, including collaborative research with other firms and universities. A novel twist to our empirical analysis is that we estimate a sample selection model, which allows us to treat the decision to conduct R&D as endogenous. We find strong evidence of positive returns to collaborative research with other companies, whereas collaborative research with universities does not appear to enhance productivity. This result implies that firms may conduct R&D with universities when appropriability conditions are weak and the outcomes of such research projects do not yield direct strategic benefits.

KW - Collaborative research

KW - R&d

KW - Sample selection bias

KW - Total factor productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147185969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1043859042000332213

DO - 10.1080/1043859042000332213

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 37

EP - 50

JO - Economics of Innovation and New Technology

JF - Economics of Innovation and New Technology

SN - 1043-8599

IS - 1

ER -