Assessing the value of research in linguistics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores specific criticisms of the impact agenda and the notion that academics should be able to demonstrate the impact of their work. Taking the standpoint that demonstrating impact is not an intrinsically bad thing to do, the chapter nonetheless explores the problems surrounding the demonstration and measurement of impact from linguistic research. Problems surrounding the assessment of impact are highlighted by reference to my work on the stylistics of subtitling. Ultimately, I argue that the REF view of impact is unhelpfully narrow and that a more realistic view is needed of the process by which theoretical work comes to have practical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationApplying Linguistics
Subtitle of host publicationLanguage and the Impact Agenda
EditorsDan McIntyre, Hazel Price
PublisherRoutledge
Pages17-28
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781351055178
ISBN (Print)9781138237506
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

linguistics
criticism

Cite this

McIntyre, D. (2018). Assessing the value of research in linguistics. In D. McIntyre, & H. Price (Eds.), Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda (pp. 17-28). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185
McIntyre, Daniel. / Assessing the value of research in linguistics. Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. editor / Dan McIntyre ; Hazel Price. Routledge, 2018. pp. 17-28
@inbook{0fd6c07f7779431f95aad1eb9921385d,
title = "Assessing the value of research in linguistics",
abstract = "This chapter explores specific criticisms of the impact agenda and the notion that academics should be able to demonstrate the impact of their work. Taking the standpoint that demonstrating impact is not an intrinsically bad thing to do, the chapter nonetheless explores the problems surrounding the demonstration and measurement of impact from linguistic research. Problems surrounding the assessment of impact are highlighted by reference to my work on the stylistics of subtitling. Ultimately, I argue that the REF view of impact is unhelpfully narrow and that a more realistic view is needed of the process by which theoretical work comes to have practical applications.",
author = "Daniel McIntyre",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "12",
doi = "10.4324/9781351055185",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138237506",
pages = "17--28",
editor = "Dan McIntyre and Price, {Hazel }",
booktitle = "Applying Linguistics",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

McIntyre, D 2018, Assessing the value of research in linguistics. in D McIntyre & H Price (eds), Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge, pp. 17-28. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185

Assessing the value of research in linguistics. / McIntyre, Daniel.

Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. ed. / Dan McIntyre; Hazel Price. Routledge, 2018. p. 17-28.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing the value of research in linguistics

AU - McIntyre, Daniel

PY - 2018/4/12

Y1 - 2018/4/12

N2 - This chapter explores specific criticisms of the impact agenda and the notion that academics should be able to demonstrate the impact of their work. Taking the standpoint that demonstrating impact is not an intrinsically bad thing to do, the chapter nonetheless explores the problems surrounding the demonstration and measurement of impact from linguistic research. Problems surrounding the assessment of impact are highlighted by reference to my work on the stylistics of subtitling. Ultimately, I argue that the REF view of impact is unhelpfully narrow and that a more realistic view is needed of the process by which theoretical work comes to have practical applications.

AB - This chapter explores specific criticisms of the impact agenda and the notion that academics should be able to demonstrate the impact of their work. Taking the standpoint that demonstrating impact is not an intrinsically bad thing to do, the chapter nonetheless explores the problems surrounding the demonstration and measurement of impact from linguistic research. Problems surrounding the assessment of impact are highlighted by reference to my work on the stylistics of subtitling. Ultimately, I argue that the REF view of impact is unhelpfully narrow and that a more realistic view is needed of the process by which theoretical work comes to have practical applications.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Applying-Linguistics-Language-and-the-Impact-Agenda/McIntyre-Price/p/book/9781138237513

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048677595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781351055185

DO - 10.4324/9781351055185

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138237506

SP - 17

EP - 28

BT - Applying Linguistics

A2 - McIntyre, Dan

A2 - Price, Hazel

PB - Routledge

ER -

McIntyre D. Assessing the value of research in linguistics. In McIntyre D, Price H, editors, Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge. 2018. p. 17-28 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185