Associative Discrimination in Britain and in the European Union: a still too Elastic Concept?

Pierre De Gioia Carabellese, Robert J. Colhoun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The concept of associative discrimination to which the latest decision, delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Attridge Law v Coleman, has virtually given the green light to jurisdictions across the European Union, is addressed in this contribution in regard to its inherent implications for employers – with the inevitable negative repercussions which will be felt – and, from a legal perspective, to the lack of clarity in which this relatively new concept continues to be shrouded, i.e. whether it covers the specific prohibited conduct of “indirect discrimination” as well. In analysing the “judicial” notion and the elastic nature of discrimination, the authors embark upon an extensive examination of the British legislation in this matter, which more recently has culminated in a comprehensive statute – the Equality Act 2010 – replete with a full bounty of “protected characteristics” previously scattered across multifarious pieces of legislation, of an equality character. The discussion goes on to draw a comparison between Britain and a further EU jurisdiction – the Italian one – in order to identify analogies and differences in respect to the modalities and methodologies whereby the concept of associative discrimination has been implemented at legislative level and interpreted doctrinally in each over the last decade.
LanguageEnglish
Pages247-261
Number of pages15
JournalE-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies
Volume1
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discrimination
jurisdiction
equality
legislation
court of justice
statute
employer
EU
act
examination
Law
lack
methodology

Cite this

@article{9bde07a3210547a294a5e46abf3bf51f,
title = "Associative Discrimination in Britain and in the European Union: a still too Elastic Concept?",
abstract = "The concept of associative discrimination to which the latest decision, delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Attridge Law v Coleman, has virtually given the green light to jurisdictions across the European Union, is addressed in this contribution in regard to its inherent implications for employers – with the inevitable negative repercussions which will be felt – and, from a legal perspective, to the lack of clarity in which this relatively new concept continues to be shrouded, i.e. whether it covers the specific prohibited conduct of “indirect discrimination” as well. In analysing the “judicial” notion and the elastic nature of discrimination, the authors embark upon an extensive examination of the British legislation in this matter, which more recently has culminated in a comprehensive statute – the Equality Act 2010 – replete with a full bounty of “protected characteristics” previously scattered across multifarious pieces of legislation, of an equality character. The discussion goes on to draw a comparison between Britain and a further EU jurisdiction – the Italian one – in order to identify analogies and differences in respect to the modalities and methodologies whereby the concept of associative discrimination has been implemented at legislative level and interpreted doctrinally in each over the last decade.",
author = "{De Gioia Carabellese}, Pierre and Colhoun, {Robert J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "247--261",
journal = "E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies",
issn = "2280-4056",
publisher = "ADAPT University Press",
number = "3-4",

}

Associative Discrimination in Britain and in the European Union : a still too Elastic Concept? / De Gioia Carabellese, Pierre; Colhoun, Robert J.

In: E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3-4, 10.2012, p. 247-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associative Discrimination in Britain and in the European Union

T2 - E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies

AU - De Gioia Carabellese, Pierre

AU - Colhoun, Robert J.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The concept of associative discrimination to which the latest decision, delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Attridge Law v Coleman, has virtually given the green light to jurisdictions across the European Union, is addressed in this contribution in regard to its inherent implications for employers – with the inevitable negative repercussions which will be felt – and, from a legal perspective, to the lack of clarity in which this relatively new concept continues to be shrouded, i.e. whether it covers the specific prohibited conduct of “indirect discrimination” as well. In analysing the “judicial” notion and the elastic nature of discrimination, the authors embark upon an extensive examination of the British legislation in this matter, which more recently has culminated in a comprehensive statute – the Equality Act 2010 – replete with a full bounty of “protected characteristics” previously scattered across multifarious pieces of legislation, of an equality character. The discussion goes on to draw a comparison between Britain and a further EU jurisdiction – the Italian one – in order to identify analogies and differences in respect to the modalities and methodologies whereby the concept of associative discrimination has been implemented at legislative level and interpreted doctrinally in each over the last decade.

AB - The concept of associative discrimination to which the latest decision, delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Attridge Law v Coleman, has virtually given the green light to jurisdictions across the European Union, is addressed in this contribution in regard to its inherent implications for employers – with the inevitable negative repercussions which will be felt – and, from a legal perspective, to the lack of clarity in which this relatively new concept continues to be shrouded, i.e. whether it covers the specific prohibited conduct of “indirect discrimination” as well. In analysing the “judicial” notion and the elastic nature of discrimination, the authors embark upon an extensive examination of the British legislation in this matter, which more recently has culminated in a comprehensive statute – the Equality Act 2010 – replete with a full bounty of “protected characteristics” previously scattered across multifarious pieces of legislation, of an equality character. The discussion goes on to draw a comparison between Britain and a further EU jurisdiction – the Italian one – in order to identify analogies and differences in respect to the modalities and methodologies whereby the concept of associative discrimination has been implemented at legislative level and interpreted doctrinally in each over the last decade.

UR - http://ejcls.adapt.it/index.php/ejcls_adapt/index

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 247

EP - 261

JO - E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies

JF - E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies

SN - 2280-4056

IS - 3-4

ER -