Astronomical image compression

M. Louys, J. L. Starck, S. Mei, F. Bonnarel, F. Murtagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare a range of powerful compression methods - fractal, wavelets, pyramidal median, JPEG - with compression tools dedicated to astronomy such as HCOMPRESS, FITSPRESS and Mathematical Morphology, and apply these to astronomical images. Quality is quantified from visual appearance, and from photometric and astrometric measurements. Computational requirements of each method are discussed. We also review the implications of Web-based storage and transmission, stressing what we term progressive vision. In summary, no method is perfect, but the PMT method is the best compromise for general astronomical images, combining acceptable photometric and positional precision with good compression capabilities. JPEG is still an excellent method for compression factors less than 40 and has the advantage of being very widely available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-590
Number of pages12
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series
Volume136
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

compression
astronomy
fractals
requirements
wavelet
method

Cite this

Louys, M. ; Starck, J. L. ; Mei, S. ; Bonnarel, F. ; Murtagh, F. / Astronomical image compression. In: Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. 1999 ; Vol. 136, No. 3. pp. 579-590.
@article{c2a2e69e88e44950950efe6c8bf0176d,
title = "Astronomical image compression",
abstract = "We compare a range of powerful compression methods - fractal, wavelets, pyramidal median, JPEG - with compression tools dedicated to astronomy such as HCOMPRESS, FITSPRESS and Mathematical Morphology, and apply these to astronomical images. Quality is quantified from visual appearance, and from photometric and astrometric measurements. Computational requirements of each method are discussed. We also review the implications of Web-based storage and transmission, stressing what we term progressive vision. In summary, no method is perfect, but the PMT method is the best compromise for general astronomical images, combining acceptable photometric and positional precision with good compression capabilities. JPEG is still an excellent method for compression factors less than 40 and has the advantage of being very widely available.",
keywords = "Astronomical data bases: miscellaneous, Data analysis, Image processing",
author = "M. Louys and Starck, {J. L.} and S. Mei and F. Bonnarel and F. Murtagh",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1051/aas:1999235",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "579--590",
journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",
issn = "0004-6361",
publisher = "EDP Sciences",
number = "3",

}

Louys, M, Starck, JL, Mei, S, Bonnarel, F & Murtagh, F 1999, 'Astronomical image compression', Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1051/aas:1999235

Astronomical image compression. / Louys, M.; Starck, J. L.; Mei, S.; Bonnarel, F.; Murtagh, F.

In: Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 136, No. 3, 01.05.1999, p. 579-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Astronomical image compression

AU - Louys, M.

AU - Starck, J. L.

AU - Mei, S.

AU - Bonnarel, F.

AU - Murtagh, F.

PY - 1999/5/1

Y1 - 1999/5/1

N2 - We compare a range of powerful compression methods - fractal, wavelets, pyramidal median, JPEG - with compression tools dedicated to astronomy such as HCOMPRESS, FITSPRESS and Mathematical Morphology, and apply these to astronomical images. Quality is quantified from visual appearance, and from photometric and astrometric measurements. Computational requirements of each method are discussed. We also review the implications of Web-based storage and transmission, stressing what we term progressive vision. In summary, no method is perfect, but the PMT method is the best compromise for general astronomical images, combining acceptable photometric and positional precision with good compression capabilities. JPEG is still an excellent method for compression factors less than 40 and has the advantage of being very widely available.

AB - We compare a range of powerful compression methods - fractal, wavelets, pyramidal median, JPEG - with compression tools dedicated to astronomy such as HCOMPRESS, FITSPRESS and Mathematical Morphology, and apply these to astronomical images. Quality is quantified from visual appearance, and from photometric and astrometric measurements. Computational requirements of each method are discussed. We also review the implications of Web-based storage and transmission, stressing what we term progressive vision. In summary, no method is perfect, but the PMT method is the best compromise for general astronomical images, combining acceptable photometric and positional precision with good compression capabilities. JPEG is still an excellent method for compression factors less than 40 and has the advantage of being very widely available.

KW - Astronomical data bases: miscellaneous

KW - Data analysis

KW - Image processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000008786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1051/aas:1999235

DO - 10.1051/aas:1999235

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 579

EP - 590

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

SN - 0004-6361

IS - 3

ER -