Authority and judgement in the digital archive

Alan Dix, Rachel Cowgill, Christina Bashford, Simon McVeigh, Rupert Ridgewell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

The transformative promise of the digital humanities is not without problems. This paper looks at digital archive curation using a database of 19th-century London concerts as a case study. We examine some of the barriers faced in its development, related to expertise, volume and complexity, the gap between cost and benefit, and the desire for an authoritative and complete dataset that forces a particular linear process of curation. We explore the potential for more radical approaches where curation and use are interleaved, and where digitally maintained provenance allows professional judgement to be applied to incomplete, crowdsourced, or automatically processed data.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationACM International Conference Proceeding Series
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

concert
expertise
costs

Cite this

Dix, A., Cowgill, R., Bashford, C., McVeigh, S., & Ridgewell, R. (2014). Authority and judgement in the digital archive. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series DOI: 10.1145/2660168.2660171
Dix, Alan ; Cowgill, Rachel ; Bashford, Christina ; McVeigh, Simon ; Ridgewell, Rupert. / Authority and judgement in the digital archive. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2014.
@inproceedings{5142990ddf7a44b494296b7e3ce37b89,
title = "Authority and judgement in the digital archive",
abstract = "The transformative promise of the digital humanities is not without problems. This paper looks at digital archive curation using a database of 19th-century London concerts as a case study. We examine some of the barriers faced in its development, related to expertise, volume and complexity, the gap between cost and benefit, and the desire for an authoritative and complete dataset that forces a particular linear process of curation. We explore the potential for more radical approaches where curation and use are interleaved, and where digitally maintained provenance allows professional judgement to be applied to incomplete, crowdsourced, or automatically processed data.",
keywords = "Concerts, Digital archives, Digital humanities, Ephemera, Linked data, Musicology, Open data, Performance history",
author = "Alan Dix and Rachel Cowgill and Christina Bashford and Simon McVeigh and Rupert Ridgewell",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1145/2660168.2660171",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-145033002-2",
booktitle = "ACM International Conference Proceeding Series",

}

Dix, A, Cowgill, R, Bashford, C, McVeigh, S & Ridgewell, R 2014, Authority and judgement in the digital archive. in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. DOI: 10.1145/2660168.2660171

Authority and judgement in the digital archive. / Dix, Alan; Cowgill, Rachel; Bashford, Christina; McVeigh, Simon; Ridgewell, Rupert.

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2014.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Authority and judgement in the digital archive

AU - Dix,Alan

AU - Cowgill,Rachel

AU - Bashford,Christina

AU - McVeigh,Simon

AU - Ridgewell,Rupert

PY - 2014/9/12

Y1 - 2014/9/12

N2 - The transformative promise of the digital humanities is not without problems. This paper looks at digital archive curation using a database of 19th-century London concerts as a case study. We examine some of the barriers faced in its development, related to expertise, volume and complexity, the gap between cost and benefit, and the desire for an authoritative and complete dataset that forces a particular linear process of curation. We explore the potential for more radical approaches where curation and use are interleaved, and where digitally maintained provenance allows professional judgement to be applied to incomplete, crowdsourced, or automatically processed data.

AB - The transformative promise of the digital humanities is not without problems. This paper looks at digital archive curation using a database of 19th-century London concerts as a case study. We examine some of the barriers faced in its development, related to expertise, volume and complexity, the gap between cost and benefit, and the desire for an authoritative and complete dataset that forces a particular linear process of curation. We explore the potential for more radical approaches where curation and use are interleaved, and where digitally maintained provenance allows professional judgement to be applied to incomplete, crowdsourced, or automatically processed data.

KW - Concerts

KW - Digital archives

KW - Digital humanities

KW - Ephemera

KW - Linked data

KW - Musicology

KW - Open data

KW - Performance history

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985028286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2660168.2660171

DO - 10.1145/2660168.2660171

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-145033002-2

BT - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

ER -

Dix A, Cowgill R, Bashford C, McVeigh S, Ridgewell R. Authority and judgement in the digital archive. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2014. Available from, DOI: 10.1145/2660168.2660171