Autoethnography and the doctorate in business administration: Personal, practical and scholarly impacts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using the Researcher Development Framework (RDF), we analyse autoethnographies in impact statements by doctorate in business administration (DBA) students to understand outcomes for self-reflexivity, management practices, and scholarship. We also use comparative data to content-analyse keywords on UK business school DBA web sites to explore institutional expectations. As a terminal applied research degree, the DBA is designed to generate contextualised ‘mode 2’ knowledge driven by solving organisational problems within students’ own practices. While our paper shows that DBA students value the impact of the DBA journey on themselves as reflective practitioners, only a few web sites expect DBA students to publish. Consequently, we call for greater emphasis on DBA students’ potential contributions to academic publications and the growing research impact agenda. We argue that business schools should raise the ambitions of these experienced scholar-practitioners to be more fully integrated into the academy, creating greater synergies between management theory, practice, and personal impacts in their research. Furthermore, we highlight the value of autoethnography (AE) as a useful method to incorporate self-reflexivity and to map the socialisation of DBA students within the academy. Finally, we recommend collaborative AE for DBA students and their supervisors to evidence personal, practice, and scholarly published impacts.
LanguageEnglish
Pages201-213
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Management Education
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date16 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

business administration
student
business school
reflexivity
academy
impact research
Business Administration
Doctorate
Autoethnography
Socialisation
theory-practice
synergy
management
Values

Cite this

@article{35d098d77e9a44069ef64555245ec21d,
title = "Autoethnography and the doctorate in business administration: Personal, practical and scholarly impacts",
abstract = "Using the Researcher Development Framework (RDF), we analyse autoethnographies in impact statements by doctorate in business administration (DBA) students to understand outcomes for self-reflexivity, management practices, and scholarship. We also use comparative data to content-analyse keywords on UK business school DBA web sites to explore institutional expectations. As a terminal applied research degree, the DBA is designed to generate contextualised ‘mode 2’ knowledge driven by solving organisational problems within students’ own practices. While our paper shows that DBA students value the impact of the DBA journey on themselves as reflective practitioners, only a few web sites expect DBA students to publish. Consequently, we call for greater emphasis on DBA students’ potential contributions to academic publications and the growing research impact agenda. We argue that business schools should raise the ambitions of these experienced scholar-practitioners to be more fully integrated into the academy, creating greater synergies between management theory, practice, and personal impacts in their research. Furthermore, we highlight the value of autoethnography (AE) as a useful method to incorporate self-reflexivity and to map the socialisation of DBA students within the academy. Finally, we recommend collaborative AE for DBA students and their supervisors to evidence personal, practice, and scholarly published impacts.",
keywords = "Professional Doctorate, Doctorate in Business Administration, Autoethnography, Impact, Self-reflexivity, Concurrent impact, Academic publishing",
author = "Julie Davies and Frances-Louise McGregor and Mark Horan",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "201--213",
journal = "International Journal of Management Education",
issn = "1472-8117",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autoethnography and the doctorate in business administration

T2 - International Journal of Management Education

AU - Davies, Julie

AU - McGregor, Frances-Louise

AU - Horan, Mark

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Using the Researcher Development Framework (RDF), we analyse autoethnographies in impact statements by doctorate in business administration (DBA) students to understand outcomes for self-reflexivity, management practices, and scholarship. We also use comparative data to content-analyse keywords on UK business school DBA web sites to explore institutional expectations. As a terminal applied research degree, the DBA is designed to generate contextualised ‘mode 2’ knowledge driven by solving organisational problems within students’ own practices. While our paper shows that DBA students value the impact of the DBA journey on themselves as reflective practitioners, only a few web sites expect DBA students to publish. Consequently, we call for greater emphasis on DBA students’ potential contributions to academic publications and the growing research impact agenda. We argue that business schools should raise the ambitions of these experienced scholar-practitioners to be more fully integrated into the academy, creating greater synergies between management theory, practice, and personal impacts in their research. Furthermore, we highlight the value of autoethnography (AE) as a useful method to incorporate self-reflexivity and to map the socialisation of DBA students within the academy. Finally, we recommend collaborative AE for DBA students and their supervisors to evidence personal, practice, and scholarly published impacts.

AB - Using the Researcher Development Framework (RDF), we analyse autoethnographies in impact statements by doctorate in business administration (DBA) students to understand outcomes for self-reflexivity, management practices, and scholarship. We also use comparative data to content-analyse keywords on UK business school DBA web sites to explore institutional expectations. As a terminal applied research degree, the DBA is designed to generate contextualised ‘mode 2’ knowledge driven by solving organisational problems within students’ own practices. While our paper shows that DBA students value the impact of the DBA journey on themselves as reflective practitioners, only a few web sites expect DBA students to publish. Consequently, we call for greater emphasis on DBA students’ potential contributions to academic publications and the growing research impact agenda. We argue that business schools should raise the ambitions of these experienced scholar-practitioners to be more fully integrated into the academy, creating greater synergies between management theory, practice, and personal impacts in their research. Furthermore, we highlight the value of autoethnography (AE) as a useful method to incorporate self-reflexivity and to map the socialisation of DBA students within the academy. Finally, we recommend collaborative AE for DBA students and their supervisors to evidence personal, practice, and scholarly published impacts.

KW - Professional Doctorate

KW - Doctorate in Business Administration

KW - Autoethnography

KW - Impact

KW - Self-reflexivity

KW - Concurrent impact

KW - Academic publishing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062893658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 201

EP - 213

JO - International Journal of Management Education

JF - International Journal of Management Education

SN - 1472-8117

IS - 2

ER -