Abstract
Regulatory frameworks associated to building design are usually complex, representing extensive sets of requirements. For healthcare projects in the UK, this includes statutory and guidance documents. Existing research indicates that they contain subjective requirements, which challenge the practical adoption of automated compliance checking, leading to limited outcomes. This paper aims to propose recommendations for the adoption of automated compliance checking in the design of healthcare buildings. Design Science Research was used to gain a detailed understanding of how information from existing regulatory requirements affects automation, through an empirical study in the design of a primary healthcare facility. In this study, a previously proposed taxonomy was implemented and refined, resulting in the identification of different types of subjective requirements. Based on empirical data emerging from the research, a set of recommendations was proposed focusing on the revision of regulatory documents, as well as to aid designers implementing automated compliance in practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103822 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Automation in Construction |
| Volume | 129 |
| Early online date | 6 Jul 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Automated compliance checking in healthcare building design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver