Abstract
Technology has come to dominate the modern experience of pregnancy and childbirth, but instead of empowering pregnant women, technology has been used to identify a second patient, the foetus, characterised as a distinct entity separate from the pregnant woman, with its own needs and interests. Often, the interests of the foetus and the woman will be aligned and their care intertwined; nevertheless, in legal and medical discourses the two ‘patients’ are frequently framed as antagonists with conflicting interests. This book focuses upon the permissibility of encroachment on the pregnant woman's autonomy in the interests of the foetus. Drawing on the law in England and Wales, the United States of America and Germany, Samantha Halliday considers the tension between a pregnant woman's autonomy and medical actions taken to protect the foetus, addressing circumstances in which courts have declared medical treatment lawful in the face of the pregnant woman's refusal of consent. As a work that calls into question the understanding of autonomy in prenatal medical care, this book will be of great use and interest to students, researchers and practitioners in medical law, comparative law, bioethics and human rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Oxon |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Number of pages | 249 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781843147206 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780415423038, 9781859419182 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Biomedical Law & Ethics Library |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Routledge |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Autonomy and Pregnancy: A Comparative Analysis of Compelled Obstetric Intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver