'Benefit Street' and the Myth of Workless Communities

Robert MacDonald, Tracy Shildrick, Andy Furlong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically engages with two pervasive myths about welfare in the UK which are routinely retailed by politicians and the media. The first is the myth of the family where 'nobody has worked for generations'. The second is the myth of the area where 'nobody works around here'. In undertaking research that sought to investigate the first of these ideas (i.e. that there are families where no-one has worked over several generations), we simultaneously gathered evidence about the likelihood of the second (i.e. that there are localities were no-one is in employment). In this paper we contend directly with the idea that whole streets and neighbourhoods are of out of work and living on welfare benefits, that was the rationale for Channel 4's Benefits Street. The paper shows that this is a powerful and important idea that is shared by leading politicians and think tanks yet it is an idea which bears little relationship to the facts of worklessness and benefit receipt. Thus, the aim of our paper is simple and empirical: is the central idea of 'Benefits Street' true? Are there streets and neighbourhoods in the UK where virtually no-one works?

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
JournalSociological Research Online
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

myth
politician
welfare
community
think tank
evidence

Cite this

MacDonald, Robert ; Shildrick, Tracy ; Furlong, Andy. / 'Benefit Street' and the Myth of Workless Communities. In: Sociological Research Online. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 1-6.
@article{9e5d370a061b4ff1ac9eea8a35b92f47,
title = "'Benefit Street' and the Myth of Workless Communities",
abstract = "This paper critically engages with two pervasive myths about welfare in the UK which are routinely retailed by politicians and the media. The first is the myth of the family where 'nobody has worked for generations'. The second is the myth of the area where 'nobody works around here'. In undertaking research that sought to investigate the first of these ideas (i.e. that there are families where no-one has worked over several generations), we simultaneously gathered evidence about the likelihood of the second (i.e. that there are localities were no-one is in employment). In this paper we contend directly with the idea that whole streets and neighbourhoods are of out of work and living on welfare benefits, that was the rationale for Channel 4's Benefits Street. The paper shows that this is a powerful and important idea that is shared by leading politicians and think tanks yet it is an idea which bears little relationship to the facts of worklessness and benefit receipt. Thus, the aim of our paper is simple and empirical: is the central idea of 'Benefits Street' true? Are there streets and neighbourhoods in the UK where virtually no-one works?",
keywords = "Benefits, Neighbourhoods, Welfare, Worklessness",
author = "Robert MacDonald and Tracy Shildrick and Andy Furlong",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5153/sro.3438",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
publisher = "Sociological Research Online",
number = "3",

}

'Benefit Street' and the Myth of Workless Communities. / MacDonald, Robert; Shildrick, Tracy; Furlong, Andy.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Benefit Street' and the Myth of Workless Communities

AU - MacDonald, Robert

AU - Shildrick, Tracy

AU - Furlong, Andy

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - This paper critically engages with two pervasive myths about welfare in the UK which are routinely retailed by politicians and the media. The first is the myth of the family where 'nobody has worked for generations'. The second is the myth of the area where 'nobody works around here'. In undertaking research that sought to investigate the first of these ideas (i.e. that there are families where no-one has worked over several generations), we simultaneously gathered evidence about the likelihood of the second (i.e. that there are localities were no-one is in employment). In this paper we contend directly with the idea that whole streets and neighbourhoods are of out of work and living on welfare benefits, that was the rationale for Channel 4's Benefits Street. The paper shows that this is a powerful and important idea that is shared by leading politicians and think tanks yet it is an idea which bears little relationship to the facts of worklessness and benefit receipt. Thus, the aim of our paper is simple and empirical: is the central idea of 'Benefits Street' true? Are there streets and neighbourhoods in the UK where virtually no-one works?

AB - This paper critically engages with two pervasive myths about welfare in the UK which are routinely retailed by politicians and the media. The first is the myth of the family where 'nobody has worked for generations'. The second is the myth of the area where 'nobody works around here'. In undertaking research that sought to investigate the first of these ideas (i.e. that there are families where no-one has worked over several generations), we simultaneously gathered evidence about the likelihood of the second (i.e. that there are localities were no-one is in employment). In this paper we contend directly with the idea that whole streets and neighbourhoods are of out of work and living on welfare benefits, that was the rationale for Channel 4's Benefits Street. The paper shows that this is a powerful and important idea that is shared by leading politicians and think tanks yet it is an idea which bears little relationship to the facts of worklessness and benefit receipt. Thus, the aim of our paper is simple and empirical: is the central idea of 'Benefits Street' true? Are there streets and neighbourhoods in the UK where virtually no-one works?

KW - Benefits

KW - Neighbourhoods

KW - Welfare

KW - Worklessness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84909985799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5153/sro.3438

DO - 10.5153/sro.3438

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Sociological Research Online

T2 - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 3

ER -