Between two stools? the government's 'preventing violent extremism' agenda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 7/7 London suicide bombings of July 2005 and numerous subsequent Islamist terror plots have highlighted the reality of an 'internal' threat to Britain. One governmental response has been the 'Preventing Violent Extremism' (PVE) programme. Whilst the educational aspect of its focus on Muslim young people is to be welcomed, there are serious concerns as to whether PVE policy, as currently designed, is falling between two stools. To date, the programme focuses exclusively on Muslim communities in flat contradiction to the integration policy priority of community cohesion, so risking further defensiveness from Muslim communities and resentment from white working class communities. Whilst ignoring the right-wing extremism growing in some of those white communities, PVE work with young people is actually failing to engage openly and robustly with the real political issues driving Muslim anger and minority extremist support. The confidence, understanding and skills of educational practitioners are vital here.

LanguageEnglish
Pages282-291
Number of pages10
JournalPolitical Quarterly
Volume80
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

radicalism
Muslim
community
right-wing radicalism
integration policy
anger
group cohesion
working class
suicide
terrorism
confidence
minority
threat

Cite this

@article{c36441e25e404c85aa5e827969a46847,
title = "Between two stools? the government's 'preventing violent extremism' agenda",
abstract = "The 7/7 London suicide bombings of July 2005 and numerous subsequent Islamist terror plots have highlighted the reality of an 'internal' threat to Britain. One governmental response has been the 'Preventing Violent Extremism' (PVE) programme. Whilst the educational aspect of its focus on Muslim young people is to be welcomed, there are serious concerns as to whether PVE policy, as currently designed, is falling between two stools. To date, the programme focuses exclusively on Muslim communities in flat contradiction to the integration policy priority of community cohesion, so risking further defensiveness from Muslim communities and resentment from white working class communities. Whilst ignoring the right-wing extremism growing in some of those white communities, PVE work with young people is actually failing to engage openly and robustly with the real political issues driving Muslim anger and minority extremist support. The confidence, understanding and skills of educational practitioners are vital here.",
keywords = "Cohesion, Extremism, Islamic, Multiculturalism, Policies, Terrorism",
author = "Paul Thomas",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01985.x",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "282--291",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Between two stools? the government's 'preventing violent extremism' agenda. / Thomas, Paul.

In: Political Quarterly, Vol. 80, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 282-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between two stools? the government's 'preventing violent extremism' agenda

AU - Thomas, Paul

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The 7/7 London suicide bombings of July 2005 and numerous subsequent Islamist terror plots have highlighted the reality of an 'internal' threat to Britain. One governmental response has been the 'Preventing Violent Extremism' (PVE) programme. Whilst the educational aspect of its focus on Muslim young people is to be welcomed, there are serious concerns as to whether PVE policy, as currently designed, is falling between two stools. To date, the programme focuses exclusively on Muslim communities in flat contradiction to the integration policy priority of community cohesion, so risking further defensiveness from Muslim communities and resentment from white working class communities. Whilst ignoring the right-wing extremism growing in some of those white communities, PVE work with young people is actually failing to engage openly and robustly with the real political issues driving Muslim anger and minority extremist support. The confidence, understanding and skills of educational practitioners are vital here.

AB - The 7/7 London suicide bombings of July 2005 and numerous subsequent Islamist terror plots have highlighted the reality of an 'internal' threat to Britain. One governmental response has been the 'Preventing Violent Extremism' (PVE) programme. Whilst the educational aspect of its focus on Muslim young people is to be welcomed, there are serious concerns as to whether PVE policy, as currently designed, is falling between two stools. To date, the programme focuses exclusively on Muslim communities in flat contradiction to the integration policy priority of community cohesion, so risking further defensiveness from Muslim communities and resentment from white working class communities. Whilst ignoring the right-wing extremism growing in some of those white communities, PVE work with young people is actually failing to engage openly and robustly with the real political issues driving Muslim anger and minority extremist support. The confidence, understanding and skills of educational practitioners are vital here.

KW - Cohesion

KW - Extremism

KW - Islamic

KW - Multiculturalism

KW - Policies

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249136612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01985.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01985.x

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 282

EP - 291

JO - Political Quarterly

T2 - Political Quarterly

JF - Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

IS - 2

ER -